Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/396,382

Air Filter Using Himalayan Salt

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Dec 26, 2023
Examiner
JONES, CHRISTOPHER P
Art Unit
1776
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
1023 granted / 1346 resolved
+11.0% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
1385
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
41.6%
+1.6% vs TC avg
§102
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
§112
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1346 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: Paragraph 26 of the specification recites “box 202” twice. The second instance states “(not shown)”. Since the box is not being shown in the figures, it should not recite the reference number “202”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, the term “large” is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “large” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. The type of salt being required by “large granule salt” is unclear and therefore the claim is indefinite. Since “large” is a relative term, for purposes of examination, any sized salt is deemed to anticipate the claim. Claims 2 and 3 are rejected for being dependent on an indefinite claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Schuld USPA 2019/0247775 A1. Regarding claim 1, Schuld discloses a box (figure 1: outer frame) comprising a large granule salt (figure 2: salt 26), wherein the large granule salt is Himalayan salt (paragraph 14). Regarding claim 2, Schuld discloses that the box is covered with fabric mesh (figure 1: media 14; paragraph 12: non-woven fibers form a type of fabric mesh). Regarding claim 3, Schuld discloses that the box comprises supporting elements providing strength to the box (figure 1: supports 44). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER P JONES whose telephone number is (571)270-7383. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-6PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Dieterle can be reached at (571)270-7872. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER P JONES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1776
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 26, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599865
Sealing Interface, Air Dryer Cartridge and Air Treatment Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599869
GAS SEPARATION METHOD AND GAS SEPARATION APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594519
METHODS FOR REGENERATING A FILTER MEDIUM AND CLEANING FLUE GAS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589354
ACIDIC GAS SEPARATION DEVICE, AIR PURIFIER, AIR CONDITIONER, AND ACIDIC GAS CONCENTRATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590284
SYSTEM FOR THE CAPTURE AND PURIFICATION OF CO2 AND PURIFICATION UNIT OF SAID SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+24.8%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1346 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month