Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/396,435

ATOMIZATION CORE, ATOMIZER AND ELECTRONIC ATOMIZATION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 26, 2023
Priority
Sep 22, 2023 — CN 202322582359.1
Examiner
WEILER, NICHOLAS JOSEPH
Art Unit
1749
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Shenzhen Woody Vapes Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
45%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
99 granted / 159 resolved
-2.7% vs TC avg
Minimal -17% lift
Without
With
+-17.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
183
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
90.1%
+50.1% vs TC avg
§102
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§112
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 159 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, 7-12, and 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Wang (US 2025/0120443 A1). Regarding claim 1, Wang teaches an atomization core (Fig. 1, Ref. Num. 100) in an atomization channel (Fig. 8, center channel) configured to heat an atomization substrate that comprises a first heating member (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 13), a second heating member (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 23), an electrode portion (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 24, 25), and a controller (Fig. 8, Ref. Num. 7). The first and second heating members are disposed in the atomization channel and the first heating member (Fig. 7, Ref. Num. 13) is disposed near the outlet (Fig. 7, Ref. Num. 11) and the second heating member (Fig. 7, Ref. Num. 23) is disposed near the substrate outlet (Fig. 7, Ref. Num. 25). Finally, the controller is connected to the heating members through the electrode portion to control the operation of the heaters (Para. [0037]). Regarding claim 2, Wang teaches a first electrode (Fig. 5, Ref. 33) that has an output connected to the first and second heating members and an input connected to the controller (Para. [0037]), a second electrode (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 14) with an output connected to the first heating member (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 13) and an input connected to the controller (Para. [0037]), and a third electrode (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 24) with an output connected to the second heating member (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 23) and an input connected to the controller (Para. [0037]). Since the controller controls the power sent to the atomizing core (Para. [0029]), the controller would be capable of having the first heating member operate after the second heating member has operated. Regarding claim 7, Wang teaches a first liquid-absorbing member (Fig. 7, Ref. Num. 22) in the atomization channel that provides a first heating channel (Fig. 7, Inside of Ref. Num. 22) and the second heating member (Fig. 7, Ref. Num. 23) is provided in the first heating channel. Regarding claim 8, Wang teaches that the second heating member (Fig. 7, Ref. Num. 23) is provided in the first heating channel (Fig. 7, Ref. Num. 22) and a second liquid-absorbing member (Fig. 7, Ref. Num. 12) that provides a second heating channel (Fig. 7, Inside of Ref. Num. 12) and the first heating member (Fig. 7, Ref. Num. 13) is provided in the second heating channel. Regarding claim 9, the first heating channel (Fig. 7, Inside of Ref. Num. 22) and the second heating channel (Fig. 7, Inside of Ref. Num. 12) are coaxial and have the same inner diameter. Regarding claim 10, Wang teaches an atomizer (Fig. 6) comprising an outer shell (Fig. 6, Ref. Num. 1, 2, 3) with an atomization core (Fig. 1, Ref. Num. 100) in an atomization channel (Fig. 8, center channel) configured to heat an atomization substrate that comprises a first heating member (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 13), a second heating member (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 23), an electrode portion (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 24, 25), and a controller (Fig. 8, Ref. Num. 7). The first and second heating members are disposed in the atomization channel and the first heating member (Fig. 7, Ref. Num. 13) is disposed near the outlet (Fig. 7, Ref. Num. 11) and the second heating member (Fig. 7, Ref. Num. 23) is disposed near the substrate outlet (Fig. 7, Ref. Num. 25). Finally, the controller is connected to the heating members through the electrode portion to control the operation of the heaters (Para. [0037]). Regarding claim 11, Wang teaches an atomization substrate storage (Fig, 8, Ref. Num. 5) in an inner shell (Fig. 8, Ref. Num. 4) where the outer shell (Fig. 8, Ref. Num. 100) and the inner shell are spaced apart by the atomization substrate storage cannel, and the atomization channel communicates with the atomization substrate storage channel (Fig. 8, Ref. Num. 6). Regarding claim 12, Wang teaches a first electrode (Fig. 5, Ref. 33) that has an output connected to the first and second heating members and an input connected to the controller (Para. [0037]), a second electrode (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 14) with an output connected to the first heating member (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 13) and an input connected to the controller (Para. [0037]), and a third electrode (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 24) with an output connected to the second heating member (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 23) and an input connected to the controller (Para. [0037]). Since the controller controls the power sent to the atomizing core (Para. [0029]), the controller would be capable of having the first heating member operate after the second heating member has operated. Regarding claim 15, Wang teaches a first liquid-absorbing member (Fig. 7, Ref. Num. 22) in the atomization channel that provides a first heating channel (Fig. 7, Inside of Ref. Num. 22) and the second heating member (Fig. 7, Ref. Num. 23) is provided in the first heating channel. Regarding claim 16, Wang teaches that the second heating member (Fig. 7, Ref. Num. 23) is provided in the first heating channel (Fig. 7, Ref. Num. 22) and a second liquid-absorbing member (Fig. 7, Ref. Num. 12) that provides a second heating channel (Fig. 7, Inside of Ref. Num. 12) and the first heating member (Fig. 7, Ref. Num. 13) is provided in the second heating channel. Regarding claim 17, the first heating channel (Fig. 7, Inside of Ref. Num. 22) and the second heating channel (Fig. 7, Inside of Ref. Num. 12) are coaxial and have the same inner diameter. Regarding claim 18, Wang teaches an electronic atomization device (Fig. 8, Ref. Num. 200) comprising an atomizer (Fig. 6) comprising an outer shell (Fig. 6, Ref. Num. 1, 2, 3) with an atomization core (Fig. 1, Ref. Num. 100) in an atomization channel (Fig. 8, center channel) configured to heat an atomization substrate that comprises a first heating member (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 13), a second heating member (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 23), an electrode portion (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 24, 25), and a controller (Fig. 8, Ref. Num. 7). The first and second heating members are disposed in the atomization channel and the first heating member (Fig. 7, Ref. Num. 13) is disposed near the outlet (Fig. 7, Ref. Num. 11) and the second heating member (Fig. 7, Ref. Num. 23) is disposed near the substrate outlet (Fig. 7, Ref. Num. 25). Finally, the controller is connected to the heating members through the electrode portion to control the operation of the heaters (Para. [0037]). Regarding claim 19, Wang teaches an atomization substrate storage (Fig, 8, Ref. Num. 5) in an inner shell (Fig. 8, Ref. Num. 4) where the outer shell (Fig. 8, Ref. Num. 100) and the inner shell are spaced apart by the atomization substrate storage cannel, and the atomization channel communicates with the atomization substrate storage channel (Fig. 8, Ref. Num. 6). Regarding claim 20, Wang teaches a first electrode (Fig. 5, Ref. 33) that has an output connected to the first and second heating members and an input connected to the controller (Para. [0037]), a second electrode (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 14) with an output connected to the first heating member (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 13) and an input connected to the controller (Para. [0037]), and a third electrode (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 24) with an output connected to the second heating member (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 23) and an input connected to the controller (Para. [0037]). Since the controller controls the power sent to the atomizing core (Para. [0029]), the controller would be capable of having the first heating member operate after the second heating member has operated. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 3, 4, and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang (US 2025/0120443 A1). Regarding claims 3 and 4, Wang teaches that the distance (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 3) between the first heating member (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 13) and the second heating member (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 23) is greater than 0 mm, which overlaps the claimed range of 5 to 10 mm which is a prima facie case of obviousness. Regarding claim 13, Wang teaches that the distance (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 3) between the first heating member (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 13) and the second heating member (Fig. 5, Ref. Num. 23) is greater than 0 mm, which overlaps the claimed range of 5 to 10 mm which is a prima facie case of obviousness. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5, 6, and 14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The closet prior art of record is Wang (US 2025/0120443 A1). Regarding claims 5, 6, and 14, Wang teaches that the first and the second heating member have the same structure (Para. [0029]) and would then have the same resistances and it would destroy this reference of its intended purpose to modify the heating members so that the first heating member has a larger resistance than the second heating member. It is the examiner’s opinion that without the improper use of hindsight or destroying the references for their intended use, it would not have been obvious to combine prior art references in the manner, as required by claims 5, 6, and 13. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NICHOLAS J WEILER whose telephone number is (571)272-2664. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Katelyn Smith can be reached at (571) 270-5545. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /N.J.W./Examiner, Art Unit 1749 /KATELYN W SMITH/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1749
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 26, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679145
TIRE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673520
Heavy-Duty Vehicle Tire Tread with Improved Robustness
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12629967
TIRE COMPRISING A PATTERN PROVIDING A HIGH CONTRAST
3y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12617242
PNEUMATIC TIRE
3y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12600175
TIRE TREAD WITH THREE SIPE LEVELS AND TIRE
3y 3m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
45%
With Interview (-17.3%)
2y 7m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 159 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month