Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/396,870

EVAPORATED FUEL TREATMENT DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 27, 2023
Examiner
JONES, CHRISTOPHER P
Art Unit
1776
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Futaba Industrial Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
1023 granted / 1346 resolved
+11.0% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
1385
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
41.6%
+1.6% vs TC avg
§102
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
§112
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1346 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nakagawa JP2022-120492 [translation] in view of Davis USPA 2006/0011173 A1. Regarding claim 1, Nakagawa discloses an evaporated fuel treatment device (Abstract) comprising: a main body case (figures: 30); and a lid (figures: lid 23), the main body case including: two or more adsorption chambers (figures: chambers 11, 21 and 31), each adsorption chamber of the two or more adsorption chambers accommodating adsorbents therein (paragraph 16), the two more adsorption chambers including an atmosphere-side adsorption chamber communicating with the atmosphere (paragraphs 21 and 22: atmosphere port 4 communicates to adsorbent); an adsorber arranged at least in the atmosphere-side adsorption chamber (figure 1: adsorbent 21), the adsorber being an aggregate of the adsorbents (paragraph 18: aggregate of granules makes up the adsorbent); and an opening allowing the atmosphere-side adsorption chamber to communicate with the atmosphere (atmosphere port 4), the lid being configured to close at least a part of the opening and to be fixed to the main body case (figures: lid 23), and the lid being configured to be arranged in the vicinity of the adsorber (figure 3: lid 23 is near sorbent 21). Nakagawa does not disclose that the lid has a snap-fit structure. Davis discloses an evaporated fuel treatment device having a lid with a snap-fit structure (see Davis paragraph 89). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the claimed invention to modify Nakagawa so that the lid has a snap-fit structure, as disclosed by Davis, as this is a known convenient type of attachment mechanism for such a lid. MPEP 2144.03 (A-E). Regarding claim 2, Nakagawa discloses that the adsorber is configured such that an outer periphery thereof contacts the main body case (figure 2: adsorber 21 contacts the main body case). Regarding claim 3, Nakagawa discloses that the main body case further includes: a retaining portion retaining the adsorber (figure 3: portion 22 that retains adsorber 21), Nakagawa does not disclose a large-diameter portion configured to be arranged so as to surround the lid at a position away from and radially outward of the retaining portion and to be coupled to the lid with the snap-fit structure; and a stepped portion forming a step coupling the retaining portion and the large-diameter portion. Nevertheless, absent persuasive evidence that the particular configuration of the claimed lid is significant, it is deemed to be an obvious matter of design choice. MPEP 2144.04 (IV-B). Regarding claim 4, Nakagawa does not disclose that the evaporated fuel treatment device further comprises a sealing member configured to seal a space between the opening and the lid over an entire circumference of the space. Davis discloses a sealing member configured to seal a space between the opening and the lid over an entire circumference of the space (see Davis figure 6: sealing member 224; paragraph 88). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the claimed invention to modify Nakagawa to include a sealing member configured to seal a space between the opening and the lid over an entire circumference of the space, as disclosed by Davis, in order to prevent the leakage of gas. Regarding claim 5, Nakagawa discloses that the atmosphere-side adsorption chamber is an auxiliary chamber formed to have a smaller volume with respect to a main chamber (figure 1: 21 is smaller than 31), the main chamber being an adsorption chamber included in the two or more adsorption chambers and communicating with the atmosphere-side adsorption chamber (figure 1: 11 and 31), and wherein the adsorber is formed such that a cross-sectional area thereof with respect to a gas flow in the auxiliary chamber is greater than a cross-sectional area of the adsorber with respect to a gas flow in the main chamber (see figure 1: 21 has a larger cross-sectional area than 11). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER P JONES whose telephone number is (571)270-7383. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-6PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Dieterle can be reached at (571)270-7872. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER P JONES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1776
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 27, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599865
Sealing Interface, Air Dryer Cartridge and Air Treatment Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599869
GAS SEPARATION METHOD AND GAS SEPARATION APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594519
METHODS FOR REGENERATING A FILTER MEDIUM AND CLEANING FLUE GAS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589354
ACIDIC GAS SEPARATION DEVICE, AIR PURIFIER, AIR CONDITIONER, AND ACIDIC GAS CONCENTRATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590284
SYSTEM FOR THE CAPTURE AND PURIFICATION OF CO2 AND PURIFICATION UNIT OF SAID SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+24.8%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1346 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month