Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/397,799

Determination of Connection Failure

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 27, 2023
Priority
Jun 30, 2021 — provisional 63/217,079 +1 more
Examiner
LIU, SIMING
Art Unit
2411
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Ofinno LLC
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
471 granted / 574 resolved
+24.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
592
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
§103
50.1%
+10.1% vs TC avg
§102
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
§112
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 574 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, filed on 06/08/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claims 1, 8, 15 under 35 U.S.C. 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Selvaganapathy et al, (WO 2022/028920 A1). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4, 8-11, 15-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticpated by Selvaganapathy et al, (WO 2022/028920 A1), hereinafter as “Selv”. Regarding claim 1, 8 and 15, Selv teaches a method comprising: receiving, by a wireless device, at least one second reference signal of a second cell that is configured as a resource of a first cell, wherein the first cell comprises a primary cell of the wireless device (see abstract, “receiving configuration information comprising at least a handover execution condition for a primary cell; multiple addition conditions for multiple primary secondary cells for dual connectivity with the primary cell, wherein the addition conditions comprise at least: an addition condition for a first one of multiple primary secondary cells for dual connectivity with the primary cell”, it's noted that the primary secondary cell – configured in advance, in association with and for dual connectivity with (not in replacement of) the primary cell - is a secondary cell that is configured as a resource of a first cell; also see page 18, lines 1-8: “The MeasID is an identifier of a measurement configuration used, for example, to define a measurement configuration 24, 34 required in a handover execution condition 22 or an addition condition 32. The MeasObjectID is an identifier of a specific measurement configuration 23, 34. For example, one MeasObjectID could specify measurement of RSRP”, RSRP is Reference Signal Received Power – a measurement performed on reference signals transmitted by the measured cell. Selv therefore discloses the wireless device receiving and measuring at least one reference signal of the primary secondary cell pursuant to the addition measurement configuration for that cell); determining, based on a quality of the at least one second reference signal, that a radio resource control (RRC) connection is reliable (Page 6, last paragraph, “Configuration information for dual connectivity to a primary secondary cell. The DC configuration information can comprises an addition condition for a primary secondary cell for dual connectivity with the primary cell and a measurement configuration for configuring measurements for an addition condition for the primary secondary cell for dual connectivity with the primary cell i.e. dual connectivity of the UE with both the primary cell and the primary secondary cell. Triggering addition of a primary secondary cell for dual connectivity is dependent upon the measurements meeting the addition condition for the primary secondary cell”, page 6, line 2, “This is a mode of operation of a UE in RRC_CONNECTED”, configured with a Master Cell Group and a Secondary Cell Group); and communicating, based on the determining, with the second cell via the RRC connection (see page 6, last para, “Configuration information for dual connectivity to a primary secondary cell. The DC configuration information can comprises an addition condition for a primary secondary cell for dual connectivity with the primary cell and a measurement configuration for configuring measurements for an addition condition for the primary secondary cell for dual connectivity with the primary cell i.e. dual connectivity of the UE with both the primary cell and the primary secondary cell. Triggering addition of a primary secondary cell for dual connectivity is dependent upon the measurements meeting the addition condition for the primary secondary cell”, page 6, 1st para, “Dual Connectivity (DC): UE has contemporaneous connection to an MN and an SN. This is a mode of operation of a UE in RRC_CONNECTED, configured with a Master Cell Group and a Secondary Cell Group”). Regarding claim 2, 9, 16, Selv further teaches receiving, by the wireless device, at least one of: first configuration parameters of the first cell; and second configuration parameters of the second cell that is configured as the resource of the first cell (page 6, last para: “the DC configuration information can comprises an addition condition for a primary secondary cell for dual connectivity with the primary cell and a measurement configuration for configuring measurements for an addition condition for the primary secondary cell for dual connectivity with the primary cell i.e. dual connectivity of the UE with both the primary cell and the primary secondary cell”). Regarding claim 3, 10, 17, Selv further teaches that the first configuration parameters of the first cell comprise the second configuration parameters of the second cell (page 17, lines 32 to page 18, line 9; all of the configuration information is provided in a single RRCReconfiguration message, wherein the configuration information comprises the configuration information for handover to the primary cell and the configuration information for dual connectivity to the multiple primary secondary cells, and wherein a single measConfig information element defines both the handover measurement configuration for the primary cell’s execution condition and the measurement configurations for the primary secondary cells’ addition conditions”). Regarding claim 4, 11, 18, Slev further teaches that the second configuration parameters of the second cell are for the wireless device to use the second cell as at least one of: resources of the first cell (page 6, last para: “The DC configuration information can comprises an addition condition for a primary secondary cell for dual connectivity with the primary cell and a measurement configuration for configuring measurements for an addition condition for the primary secondary cell for dual connectivity with the primary cell”, dual connection with first cell, therefore the secondary cell is a resource of the first cell). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 5-6, 12-13 and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Slev in view of Khoshnevisan et al (US 2022/0021498 A1). Regarding claim 5, 12, 19, the aforementioned references teach all of the limitations except that the second configuration parameters of the second cell comprise a physical cell identifier (PCI) of the second cell. Khoshnevisan teaches the above limitation ([0025], "non-serving cell PCI may be configured by dedicated RRC signaling for a serving cell/component carrier (CC) (e.g., Pcell or Scell)"). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to utilize the teaching of Khoshnevisan in the system disclosed by Slev. The reason for the combination is that UE must demodulate the Scell independently which requires a PCI. Regarding claim 6, 13 and 20, the aforementioned references further teaches that the wireless device determines the PCI based on a primary synchronization signal (PSS) and a secondary synchronization signal (SSS) of the second cell (Yi, [0150]). Claim 7 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Slev, further in view of Li et al (US 2014/0192775 A1). Regarding claim 7 and 14, Slev teach all of the limitations except that the first configuration parameters comprise a first cell radio network temporary identifier (C-RNTI) for the first cell; and the second configuration parameters comprise a second C-RNTI for the second cell. Li teaches the above limitation ([0140], "the UE can be configured with a different C-RNTI for a serving cell (that is not the PCell) than the C-RNTI configured for the PCell"; [0149], "C-RNTI is configured by RRC for a cell when the cell is added"). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to utilize the teaching of Li in the system disclosed by Slev because security & scrambling sequences for communication depend on C-RNTI. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SIMING LIU whose telephone number is (571)270-3859. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8:30am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Derrick Ferris can be reached at 571-272-3123. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SIMING LIU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2411
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 27, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jun 08, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12726898
RADIO RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DRIVEN ENERGY MANAGEMENT IN WIRELESS NETWORKS
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12719539
CHANNEL STATE INFORMATION TRIGGERING AND REPORTING
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12712700
SEMI-STATIC AND DYNAMIC SUBBAND CONFIGURATION
4y 1m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12701084
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ROBUST STREAMING OF DATA
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696124
Wake-Up Packet based Coordination of Broadcasting Device Responses
4y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+10.8%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 574 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month