Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/398,143

SHUT-OFF DEVICE ADAPTED TO GENERATE A LIGHTING FUNCTION AND FRONT FACE ASSEMBLY COMPRISING SUCH A DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 28, 2023
Examiner
DALLO, JOSEPH J
Art Unit
3747
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
VALEO SYSTEMES THERMIQUES
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allow Rate
733 granted / 818 resolved
+19.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
842
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§103
32.5%
-7.5% vs TC avg
§102
44.9%
+4.9% vs TC avg
§112
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 818 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Morita US 2020/0039346 in view of Gold Petr et al WO 2022199727 (English translation provided and referred to). Regarding claim 1, Morita discloses a shut-off device 1 for a front face assembly configured to be fitted in a vehicle (see FIG. 1), wherein the shut-off device is adapted to take up a first position in which the shut-off device allows the passage of an air flow through the front face assembly (FIG. 1-3) and a second position in which the shut-off device prevents the passage of the air flow through the front face assembly (FIG. 4-6), wherein the shut-off device extends mainly in a longitudinal direction L. See paragraphs [0020]-[0030]. Morita fails to explicitly disclose, but Gold Petr et al discloses wherein the shut-off device comprises: at least an opening 6; a light guide 8; and a light source 7, wherein the opening, light guide, and light source extend mainly in the longitudinal direction L, wherein the light guide is at least partially housed in the opening. See FIG. 1-4 and paragraphs [0023]-[0036]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include the lighting as disclosed by Gold Petr et al in the system of Morita for safety reasons to provide extra light for a driver. Regarding claim 2, Gold Petr et al discloses wherein the light source comprises at least a printed circuit board and a series of light emitting diodes borne by the printed circuit board and aligned in the longitudinal direction L of the shut-off device. See paragraph [0030]. Regarding claim 3, Gold Petr et al discloses wherein the shut-off device comprises at least a first shut-off portion and a second shut-off portion which border the opening and which extend in different parallel planes (see paragraph [0021]), and wherein the light guide comprises at least an entry face for the light rays emitted by the light source and an exit face for the light rays, wherein the exit face for the light rays extending extends between the first shut-off portion and the second shut-off portion. See FIG. 1-4 and paragraphs [0023]-[0036]. Regarding claim 4, Gold Petr et al discloses wherein the exit face is curved, seen in cross section. See paragraphs [0027] and [0040]. Regarding claim 5, Gold Petr et al discloses wherein the entry face for the light rays extends in a plane parallel to one or the other of the shut-off portions which border the opening. See paragraph [0021]. Regarding claim 6, Gold Petr et al discloses wherein the light guide comprises: a retention base arranged between one of the shut-off portions which borders the opening L, and a cover H secured to the shut-off device. See paragraphs [0040]-[0045]. Regarding claim 7, Gold Petr et al discloses wherein the shut-off device comprises two openings and two light guides arranged symmetrically about a median plane of the shut-off device, wherein each of the light guides being is at least partially housed in one of the openings. See FIG. 1-4 and paragraphs [0023]-[0036]. Regarding claim 8, Gold Petr et al discloses wherein the two light guides bear against the same shut-off portion which borders two openings. See at least FIG. 1-3. Regarding claim 9, Gold Petr et al discloses wherein the front face assembly comprises: at least one frame 2 bearing the shut-off device, and comprising a light module borne by the frame and configured to emit light rays at least in the direction of the shut-off device. See FIG. 1-4 and paragraphs [0023]-[0036]. Regarding claim 10, Gold Petr et al discloses wherein the light module comprises at least a first strip light and a second strip light arranged on either side of the shut-off device. See paragraphs [0030]-[0040]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH J DALLO whose telephone number is (313)446-4844. The examiner can normally be reached 7am-7pm ET M-Th. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Phutthiwat(Pat) Wongwian can be reached at 571-270-5426. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSEPH J DALLO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 28, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600214
VEHICLE MOTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600329
ABS ACTUATOR DEVICE UNIT FOR A CARGO CYCLE AND A CARGO CYCLE PROVIDED WITH SUCH DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602072
PEDAL EMULATOR FOR A VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594914
BRAKE-TO-STEER LATERAL STABILITY MANAGEMENT BASED ON STABILITY INDICATOR CORRELATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594974
MULTI-CARRIAGE VEHICLE BOARDING RECOMMENDATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+7.1%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 818 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month