Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/398,639

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING AND SUPPRESSING VEHICLE TRAILER FIRES

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Dec 28, 2023
Examiner
KIM, CHRISTOPHER S
Art Unit
3752
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
TORC Robotics Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
721 granted / 1139 resolved
-6.7% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
62 currently pending
Career history
1184
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
§102
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
§112
40.9%
+0.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1139 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group I in the reply filed on May 11, 2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that search and examination of all of the inventions can be conducted without serous burden. This is not found persuasive because Applicant’s assertion of non serious burden is unsupported by evidence. Additionally, while Groups I-III may have some common limitations, Groups I-III are patentably distinct for the reasons set forth in the Election/Restriction Requirement mailed on March 11, 2026. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 11-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on May 11, 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation “an autonomous vehicle” in lines 1-2. The claims fails to recite structure for “autonomous.” It is uncertain what constitutes “autonomous.” The structure recited by the claim is not commensurate in scope with the function “autonomous” of the vehicle. The claim further recites “a drive system,” but a drive system does not further distinguish “autonomous” because every vehicle has a drive system. The term “proximate” in claim 10 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “proximate” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. The distance/location limited by the claim is uncertain. The term “safest” in claim 10 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “safest” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. The condition limited by the claim is uncertain. What may be considered “safest” by one of ordinary skill in the art may not be considered “safest” by another of ordinary skill in the art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER S KIM whose telephone number is (571)272-4905. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-3:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Arthur O Hall can be reached at (571) 270-1814. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER S KIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3752 CHRISTOPHER S. KIM Examiner Art Unit 3752 CK
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 28, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Aug 24, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 24, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 01, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746423
NOZZLE PLUGS FOR A DELUGE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12729524
HANDSHOWER AND DOCKING SYSTEM
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12703558
DISPENSING SYSTEMS
4y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12691316
MONITORING AND EXTINGUISHING DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12691459
Hand-Held Paint Sprayer
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+21.5%)
3y 5m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1139 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month