Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/399,084

AUTOMATION SYSTEM WITH AUGMENTING CONVEYOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 28, 2023
Examiner
HOLMES, JUSTIN
Art Unit
3655
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Ats Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
1135 granted / 1273 resolved
+37.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1293
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
41.4%
+1.4% vs TC avg
§102
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
§112
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1273 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-15 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Publication No. 2024/0017938 to Hall et al. Regarding claims 1 and 11, the Hall publication teaches an automation system comprising a primary conveyor 176 and a plurality of items 32 configured to operate on the primary conveyor, the system comprising: an auxiliary conveyor 174 provided to an overlap portion of the automation system in which the auxiliary conveyor overlaps with the primary conveyor (see Fig. 13); wherein the auxiliary conveyor is configured to connect with at least one of the plurality of pallets in the overlap portion to control the at least one of the plurality of pallets to augment the functions of the primary conveyor. See Fig. 13. However the Hall publication lacks a specific teaching that pallets are used. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the subject invention to modify the Hall publication to have the items moved that are pallets, as it would have been combining known prior art elements using known methods to provide the predictable result of having a conveyor that able to move various items for more efficient movement. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-10 and 12-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. U.S. Patent No. 6,326,708 to Tsuboi et al. teaches a linear motor. U.S. Patent No. 6,234,303 to Gales et al. teaches two conveyors. French Patent No. FR2668758 to Serge teaches two conveyor systems. Japanese Patent No. JP2018184294 to Mizukawa et al. teaches a two conveyor system. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN HOLMES whose telephone number is (571)272-3448. The examiner can normally be reached 10AM-6PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jacob S Scott can be reached at 571-270-3415. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUSTIN HOLMES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3655
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 28, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595127
System and Method for Picking Items
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595126
A CONTROLLER AND METHOD FOR TRANSPORTING DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589942
STORAGE APPARATUS, A TRANSFER SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME, AND A TRANSFERRING METHOD USING THE TRANSFER SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589789
Mobile Platform and Method of Assembly Thereof
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592450
BATTERY SYSTEM WITH DIVERTER ASSEMBLY FOR THERMAL PROPAGATION PROTECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+9.6%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1273 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month