Office Action Predictor
Application No. 18/400,379

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONFIGURING AND REPORTING QOE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 29, 2023
Examiner
HOANG, THAI D
Art Unit
2463
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
40%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

87%
Career Allow Rate
558 granted / 644 resolved
Without
With
+-46.3%
Interview Lift
avg trend
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
19 pending
663
Total Applications
career history

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§103
34.6%
-5.4% vs TC avg
§102
30.6%
-9.4% vs TC avg
§112
18.2%
-21.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Eklӧf et al (hereinafter “Eklӧf”), WO 2024/091158 A1. Regarding claims 1, 7, 12 and 18, Eklӧf discloses method and system for reporting Quality of Experience (QoE) and Radio Access Network (RAN)-Visible QoE (RVQoE) performed by a secondary node (SN) in a wireless communication system, the method and system (see figures 6-7 and 9) comprising: transmitting, to a user equipment (UE), first configuration information associated with a quality of experience (QoE) measurement, the first configuration information including an indicator indicating whether a segmentation of a report of the QoE measurement on a signaling radio bearer (SRB) associated with the report of the QoE measurement to the SN is allowed (fig. 9, step 900 the network node determines to configure the UE with QoE measurements; Page 13, lines 13-16: the QoE configuration indicates the network node to which respective QoE reports are to be sent is an indication of a SRB on which to transmit the respective QoE report; Page 17, line 30, page 41, line 17, and RRC-SegAllowed, tables on pages 39 and 43: RRC-SegAllowed: this field indicated that RRC segmentation of MeasurementReportAppLayer is allowed); and receiving, from the UE, the report of the QoE measurement based on the indicator (fig. 9, step 910, page 36, lines 4-7: The SN receives QoE reports from a UE, if the SN was configured to receive QoE reports. The message containing the QoE report may be a MeasurementReportAppLayer message sent towards the SN). Regarding claims 2, 8, 13 and 19, Eklӧf discloses wherein an SRB configured between the SN and the UE is an SRB which is separately configured with an SRB configured between a master node (MN) and the UE (see figures 6 and 9 illustrate the operation of a network node configured as a Secondary Node (SN) for a UE, for QoE measurement configuration and reporting). Regarding claims 3, 9, and 14, Eklӧf discloses wherein the SRB configured between the MN and the UE is SRB 4 (page 21, lines 11-23, and page 28, lines 10-11 and 22-25: the UE sends QoE reports on SRB4 to the MN). Regarding claims 4, 11, and 15, Eklӧf discloses wherein the first configuration information further includes at least one first QoE configuration associated with at least one different QoE measurement, respectively (abstract: Quality of Experience (QoE) and Radio Access Network (RAN) Visible QoE (RVQoE) measurements), and wherein an identifier for identifying the at least one first QoE configuration is different from an identifier for identifying at least one second QoE configuration included in second configuration information associated with a QoE measurement associated with the MN (fig. 7, steps 704, 704-1 and 704-2 and abstract: for each QoE configuration or commonly for the one or more QoE configurations, receiving an indication that indicates a network node (i.e. MN or SN) to which respective QoE reports are to be sent and, for each RVQoE configuration or commonly for the one or more RVQoE configurations, receiving an indication that indicates a network node (i.e. MN or SN) to which respective RVQoE reports are to be sent). Regarding claims 5 and 16, Eklӧf discloses wherein each of the at least one first QoE configuration includes SRB information indicating which SRB in which a report of a QoE measurement associated with each of the at least one first QoE configuration is transmitted (fig. 7, steps 704, 704-1 and 704-2 and fig. 9, step 910: The network node receives QoE reports from a UE, if the SN was (explicitly, implicitly, or derivable) configured to receive QoE reports; and step 912: The network node receives RVQoE reports from a UE, if the SN was (explicitly, implicitly, or derivable) configured to receive QoE reports). Regarding claims 6 and 17, Eklӧf discloses the method and system further comprising: in case that the SRB information included in a specific QoE configuration among the at least one first QoE configuration indicates that a report of a QoE measurement associated with the specific QoE configuration is transmitted on the SRB configured between the MN and the UE, receiving, from the MN, the QoE measurement associated with the specific QoE configuration which is transmitted to the MN by the UE (see fig. 9, steps 902-910: Optionally, additionally, or alternatively, the network node receives, from a Master Node (MN) of the UE, a request for configuration of QoE measurements and/or a request for configuration of RVQoE measurements. The request may, e.g., be included in an S-NODE ADDITION REQUEST or S- NODE MODIFICATION REQUEST message or in a new message (e.g., a new message dedicated to QoE/RVQoE coordination aspects between MN and SN for QoE/RVQoE configuration and/or reporting). Regarding claims 10 and 20, Eklӧf discloses the method and system further comprising: identifying whether the report of the QoE measurement exceeds a maximum support size of a data unit associated with the report of the QoE measurement; in case that the QoE measurement is identified as exceeding the maximum support size of the data unit (page 5, lines 6-11 and page 37, lines 25-31: determining sequence size and rrc-SegAllowed: AppLayerMeasConfig-r17 ::= SEQUENCE { measConfigAppLayerToAddModList-r17 SEQUENCE (SIZE (1..maxNrofAppLayerMeas- r17)) OF MeasConfigAppLayer-r17 OPTIONAL, -- Need N measConfigAppLayerToReleaseList-r17 SEQUENCE (SIZE (1..maxNrofAppLayerMeas- r17)) OF MeasConfigAppLayerId-r17 OPTIONAL, -- Need N rrc-SegAllowed-r17), identifying whether the segmentation is allowed based on the indicator; and in case that the segmentation is identified as being allowed, transmitting, to the SN, the report of the QoE measurement to which the segmentation is applied (page 17, line 30, page 41, line 17, and RRC-SegAllowed, tables on pages 39 and 43: RRC-SegAllowed: this field indicated that RRC segmentation of MeasurementReportAppLayer is applied). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See attached PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THAI D HOANG whose telephone number is (571)272-3184. The examiner can normally be reached 10:30 am-18:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Asad Nawaz can be reached at (571) 272-3988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. THAI HOANG D. Primary Examiner Art Unit 2463 /THAI DINH HOANG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2463
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 29, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 26, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology. Study what changed to get past this examiner.

Patent 12598047
TERMINAL, RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND BASE STATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593351
USER EQUIPMENT AND METHOD FOR PRACH PERFORMANCE REPORTING TO BASE STATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12574191
TERMINAL, RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND BASE STATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574090
REPORTING CHANNEL STATE INFORMATION IN ADVANCED MIMO ANTENNA SYSTEMS FOR CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12563640
ADJUSTING RADIO ACCESS NETWORK CONNECTIONS BASED ON COMMUNICATION FAILURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026

AI Strategy Recommendation

Click below to generate an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
40%
With Interview (-46.3%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 644 resolved cases by this examiner