DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Claims 1-20 are subject under examination.
Response to Arguments
Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
4. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows:
1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue.
3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art.
4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness.
5. Claim(s) 1-3, 14-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim (20220417793) in view of Li (US 20200413285).
Regarding claim 1, Kim (20220417793) teaches a method for reporting buffered data, comprising:
generating, by a station (STA), a first frame, wherein the first frame comprises first information, the first information comprises time information (See para 0249 “The latency BSR subfield may include information related to a time (or packet arrival time) at which each packet enters a queue (for example, a buffer). The terminal (that is, the STA) and the AP may exchange information related to the required latency of traffic”), the time information indicates a first time (See para 0249 “The latency BSR subfield may include information related to a time (or packet arrival time) at which each packet enters a queue (for example, a buffer), and
sending, by the STA, the first frame See para 0249 “The latency BSR subfield may include information related to a time (or packet arrival time) at which each packet enters a queue (for example, a buffer). The terminal (that is, the STA) and the AP may exchange information related to the required latency of traffic”.)
Kim doesn’t teach a first buffered data packet needs to be sent within the first time; wherein the first time is calculated based on a time that the first buffered data packet has been waiting to be sent.
Li (US 20200413285 ) teaches a first buffered data packet needs to be sent within the first time wherein the first time is calculated based on a time that the first buffered data packet has been waiting to be sent. (see para 0007 “The latency information includes a queuing time associated with the queued data, time-to-live information associated with the queued data indicating a deadline when the queued data is to be transmitted,.”; see para 0024 “the queuing latency aware BSR can include time-to-live information….. In other words, the time-to-live information can indicate the deadline when the reported buffered data has to be transmitted out of the buffer”; para 0038 “ the queuing latency aware BSR transmitted by STA 120a can include a queuing time associated with the data in the buffer. The queuing time can indicate how long the reported buffered data has been queued in the buffer of STA 120a.”; see para 0061 “Time-to-live 347 can include the time-to-live information that can indicate how long the reported buffered data has until it will be removed from the buffer if not transmitted”)[ time-to live information is interpreted as first time which indicates deadline when the queued data is to be transmitted ; queuing time is waiting time of buffered data packet and since time-to- live deadline is based on the how long the data is buffered , implies time-to-live to be based on the queuing time]
Thus it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine a first buffered data packet needs to be sent within the first time wherein the first time is calculated based on a time that the first buffered data packet has been waiting to be sent in the system of Kim. The motivation is to improve traffic latency (Li: see para 0040)
Regarding claim 14, Kim (20220417793) teaches at least one processor; and at least one computer-readable storage medium, wherein the at least one computer-readable storage medium stores instructions, and wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to:
Generate a first frame, wherein the first frame comprises first information, the first information comprises time information (See para 0249 “The latency BSR subfield may include information related to a time (or packet arrival time) at which each packet enters a queue (for example, a buffer). The terminal (that is, the STA) and the AP may exchange information related to the required latency of traffic”), the time information indicates a first time (See para 0249 “The latency BSR subfield may include information related to a time (or packet arrival time) at which each packet enters a queue (for example, a buffer), and
send the first frame See para 0249 “The latency BSR subfield may include information related to a time (or packet arrival time) at which each packet enters a queue (for example, a buffer). The terminal (that is, the STA) and the AP may exchange information related to the required latency of traffic”.)
Kim doesn’t teach a first buffered data packet needs to be sent within the first time; wherein the first time is calculated based on a time that the first buffered data packet has been waiting to be sent.
Li (US 20200413285 ) teaches a first buffered data packet needs to be sent within the first time wherein the first time is calculated based on a time that the first buffered data packet has been waiting to be sent. (see para 0007 “The latency information includes a queuing time associated with the queued data, time-to-live information associated with the queued data indicating a deadline when the queued data is to be transmitted,.”; see para 0024 “the queuing latency aware BSR can include time-to-live information….. In other words, the time-to-live information can indicate the deadline when the reported buffered data has to be transmitted out of the buffer”; para 0038 “ the queuing latency aware BSR transmitted by STA 120a can include a queuing time associated with the data in the buffer. The queuing time can indicate how long the reported buffered data has been queued in the buffer of STA 120a.”; see para 0061 “Time-to-live 347 can include the time-to-live information that can indicate how long the reported buffered data has until it will be removed from the buffer if not transmitted”)[ time-to live information is interpreted as first time which indicates deadline when the queued data is to be transmitted ; queuing time is waiting time of buffered data packet and since time-to- live deadline is based on the how long the data is buffered , implies time-to-live to be based on the queuing time]
Thus it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine a first buffered data packet needs to be sent within the first time wherein the first time is calculated based on a time that the first buffered data packet has been waiting to be sent in the system of Kim. The motivation is to improve traffic latency (Li: see para 0040)
Regarding claim 2,15, Kim teaches receiving, by the STA, second information, wherein the second information indicates a first resource used by the STA to send the first buffered data packet (see para 0348 “he AP may determine the size of a resource to be allocated to the terminal based on information related to the number of packets stored in the buffer”; see para 0350 “ For example, the AP may allocate a resource for low-latency traffic (that is, latency traffic) to the STA. ..For example, the AP may receive information about the buffer state of the STA, and may configure a trigger frame for the user STA based on the buffer state of the STA. The uplink resource for uplink transmission may include an uplink resource used for UL MU communication.”); and
sending, by the STA, the first buffered data packet by using the first resource (See para 0350 “For example, the AP may receive information about the buffer state of the STA, and may configure a trigger frame for the user STA based on the buffer state of the STA. The uplink resource for uplink transmission may include an uplink resource used for UL MU communication.”).
Regarding claim 3, 16, Kim teaches wherein the first information further comprises first data amount information, and the first data amount information indicates a data amount of the first buffered data packet (see para 0348 “The AP may determine.. the size of each packet stored in the buffer included in the link adaptive control field.”).
6. Claim(s) 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 17, 18, 19 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim (20220417793) in view of Li (US 20200413285) and further in view of Asterjedhi (US 20190261402 A1).
Regarding claims 4 and 17, Asterjadhi teaches wherein the first frame further comprises a first control identifier, and the first control identifier indicates a type of the first information (See para 0006 “MPDUs may be generated with BSR control fields that include TID bitmaps that explicitly indicate one or more TIDs associated with the BSR control field”).
Thus it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine a length of the first control identifier is 4 bits, and a length of the first information is 26 bits in the system of Kim. The motivation is to efficiently handle communication (Asterjadhi : see para 0045).
Regarding claims 5 and 18, Kim doesn’t teach a length of the first control identifier is 4 bits, and a length of the first information is 26 bits
Asterjedhi teaches a length of the first control identifier is 4 bits, and a length of the first information is 26 bits (see para 0061 “Further, the Control Information Subfield 300 may include, for example, 26 bits divided over the subfields 305-330.”; see para 0062 “ACI Bitmap subfield 305 may include 4 bits”) [ examiner interprets using 4 bits is a design choice]
Thus it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine a length of the first control identifier is 4 bits, and a length of the first information is 26 bits in the system of Kim. The motivation is to efficiently handle communication (Asterjadhi : see para 0045).
Regarding claim 6,19, Kim doesn’t teach a length of the first control identifier is 8 bits, and a length of the first information is 22 bit.
Asterjadhi teaches wherein a length of the first control identifier is 8 bits, and a length of the first information is 22 bits (see para 0047 “A TID bitmap may include 8 bits”; see para 0061 “Further, the Control Information Subfield 300 may include, for example, 26 bits divided over the subfields 305-330.”) [ examiner interprets using 4 bits is a design choice]
Thus it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine wherein a length of the first control identifier is 8 bits, and a length of the first information is 22 bits in the system of Kim. The motivation is to efficiently handle communication (Asterjadhi : see para 0045).
Regarding claims 7 and 20, Kim doesn’t teach the first frame further comprises a second control identifier and an extended control identifier, and the second control identifier and the extended control identifier jointly indicate a type of the first information.
Asterjadhi teaches the first frame further comprises a second control identifier and an extended control identifier, and the second control identifier and the extended control identifier jointly indicate a type of the first information (see para 0006 “A BSR control field may include an Access Category Identifier (ACI) bitmap and a delta TID parameter (e.g., a Delta TID subfield) indicating a mapping of TID-specific buffer status information to a first queue.”)
Thus it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine the first frame further comprises a second control identifier and an extended control identifier, and the second control identifier and the extended control identifier jointly indicate a type of the first information intheysystem of Kim. The motivation is to efficiently handle communication (Asterjadhi : see para 0045)
Regarding claim 8, Kim doesn’t teach a length of the second control identifier is 4 bits, a length of the extended control identifier is 4 bits, and a length of the first information is 22 bits.
Asterjadhi teaches wherein a length of the second control identifier is 4 bits, a length of the extended control identifier is 4 bits, and a length of the first information is 22 bits. (see para 0047 “A TID bitmap may include 8 bits”; see para 0061 “Further, the Control Information Subfield 300 may include, for example, 26 bits divided over the subfields 305-330.”) [ examiner interprets using 4 bits and 22 bits is a design choice]
Thus it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine wherein a length of the first control identifier is 8 bits, and a length of the first information is 22 bits in the system of Kim. The motivation is to efficiently handle communication (Asterjadhi : see para 0045)
6. Claim(s) 9-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim (20220417793) in view of Li (US 20200413285) and further in view of Viger (US 20180020373 A1)
Regarding claim 9, Modified Kim doesn’t teach determining, by the STA based on the first time, to send the first information.
Viger teaches determining, by the STA based on the first time, to send the first information (see para 0093 “bits B8-B15 represent the “queue size” subfield 203, to indicate the amount of buffered traffic for a given TID at the non-AP station sending this frame. The queue size value is the total size, rounded up to the nearest multiple of 256 octets and expressed in units of 256 octets, of all packets buffered for the specified TID. The access point may use this information to determine the next TXOP duration it will grant to the station.; see para 0095” , the “TXOP Duration Requested” provides an equivalent request as the “queue size”, as they both consider all packets buffered for the specified TID.”)
Thus it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of invention to combine determining to send the first information in the system of Kim. The motivation is to improve efficiency (Viger: see para 0022)
Regarding claim 10, Modified Kim doesn’t teach receiving, by the STA, a buffer status report poll (BSRP), wherein the BSRP indicates whether the STA sends the first information; and determining, by the STA based on the BSRP, to send the first information.
Viger teaches receiving, by the STA, a buffer status report poll (BSRP), wherein the BSRP indicates whether the STA sends the first information (See para 0120 “Upon reception of a trigger frame 430-BSR containing a request indication of buffer status report, a 802.11ax station responds with a frame including the Queue Size subfield 203 in its QoS Control field 200.”); and
determining, by the STA based on the BSRP, to send the first information (See para 0120 “02.11ax station responds with a frame including the Queue Size subfield 203 in its QoS Control field 200.”)
Thus it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of invention to combine receiving a buffer status report poll (BSRP), wherein the BSRP indicates whether the STA sends the first information in the system of Kim. The motivation is to improve efficiency (Viger: see para 0022)
6. Claim(s) 11-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim (20220417793) in view of Li (US 20200413285) and further in view of Li (US 20170230860 A1), hereafter referred as Li’860
Regarding claim 11, Modified Kim doesn’t teach wherein the first information further comprises identification information, and the identification information indicates one of a first traffic identifier (TID) to which the first buffered data packet belongs, a first access category identifier (ACI) to which the first buffered data packet belongs, or a first transmitting station identification (TSID) to which the first buffered data packet belongs.
Li’860 teaches wherein the first information further comprises identification information, and the identification information indicates one of a first traffic identifier (TID) to which the first buffered data packet belongs, a first access category identifier (ACI) to which the first buffered data packet belongs, or a first transmitting station identification (TSID) to which the first buffered data packet belongs See para048 “Field 420 can include a traffic identifier 421, which can take on the value of TID 314 (see FIG. 3). Field 430, in some embodiments, includes queue status information 431 associated with the traffic identifier 421, which can indicate the queue status of buffer 304. Field 440 can include frame body 441 and frame body 441 can be associated with a traffic identifier different from traffic identifier 421..”).
Thus it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine the first information further comprises identification information, and the identification information indicates one of a first traffic identifier (TID) to which the first buffered data packet belongs, a first access category identifier (ACI) to which the first buffered data packet belong in the system of Kim. The motivation is to improve buffer status reporting (Li’860: see para 0036).
Regarding claim 12, Modified Kim doesn’t teach second data amount information, and the second data amount information indicates one of a total data amount of the first TID to which the first buffered data packet belongs, a total data amount of the first ACI to which the first buffered data packet belongs, or a total data amount of the first TSID to which the first buffered data packet belongs.
Li’860 teaches second data amount information, and the second data amount information indicates one of a total data amount of the first TID to which the first buffered data packet belongs, a total data amount of the first ACI to which the first buffered data packet belongs, or a total data amount of the first TSID to which the first buffered data packet belongs (See para 0048 “Field 420 can include a traffic identifier 421, which can take on the value of TID 314 (see FIG. 3). Field 430, in some embodiments, includes queue status information 431 associated with the traffic identifier 421, which can indicate the queue status of buffer 304. Field 440 can include frame body 441 and frame body 441 can be associated with a traffic identifier different from traffic identifier 421.”)
Thus it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine the first information further comprises identification information, and the identification information indicates one of a first traffic identifier (TID) to which the first buffered data packet belongs, a first access category identifier (ACI) to which the first buffered data packet belong in the system of Kim. The motivation is to improve buffer status reporting (Li’860: see para 0036)
Regarding claim 13, Modified Kim doesn’t teach the first information further comprises unit information, and the unit information indicates units of a first data amount information and the second data amount information.
Li’860 teaches wherein the first information further comprises unit information, and the unit information indicates units of a first data amount information and the second data amount information (see para 0056” the aggregated buffer status sums together queue sizes or measures of data size in one or more buffers. In some embodiments, if a first buffer holds ten 256-octet units awaiting transmission, and a second buffer holds twenty 256-octet units, the aggregated indication is thirty 256-octet units”; see para 0057 “buffer status report 560 featuring the aggregated buffer status 552, a TID value 502 and a queue size 504.”)
Thus it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine the first information further comprises unit information, and the unit information indicates units of a first data amount information and the second data amount information in the system of Kim. The motivation is to improve buffer status reporting (Li’860: see para 0036)
Conclusion
Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAMIT KAUR whose telephone number is (571)270-5665. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-5PM.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NOEL BEHARRY can be reached at 5712705630. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/PAMIT KAUR/Examiner, Art Unit 2416
Prosecution Insights