Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/401,211

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD, TERMINAL DEVICE, AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 29, 2023
Examiner
TAHA, SHUKRI ABDALLAH
Art Unit
2478
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
738 granted / 881 resolved
+25.8% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
916
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
§103
63.0%
+23.0% vs TC avg
§102
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 881 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This is a Non-final action for application number 18/401,211 in response to an original application filed on 12/29/2023. Claims 1-20 are currently pending and have been considered below. Claims 1, 7, 13 and 17 are independent claims. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS), submitted on 12/29/2023 and 12/06/2024, are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claims 6, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15 and 16 are objected to because of the following informalities: Regarding claim 1; claim 1 recites the limitations “Please replace (IF) with (WHEN)” Appropriate correction(s) is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4, 7, 8, 13, 15 and 17-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lunden et al. (US 2015/0282033 A1) in view of Ghanbarinejad et al. (WO 2024/224380 A1). Regarding claims 1 and 13, a wireless communication method, comprising: determining a type or terminal group to which a terminal device belongs, [Figure 18, Ref # 1810, he WTRU may compare the energy harvested Eh to the energy consumed E.sub.c in ZE idle mode operation, wherein the terminal type is either low energy consumption or high energy consumption type, (Haque et al., Paragraph 166)], Haque et al. fails to explicitly teach sending a backscatter signal based on a transmission resource, a backoff parameter or a time unit corresponding to the type or terminal group to which the terminal device belongs, Iqbal et al. teaches that when collision happens the backoff window is increased as in wireless devices. Since some backscatter transmissions may occur during the backscatter phase, the last transmission of the backscatter tag is required to finish within the assigned time, Therefore, the backscatter tag needs to check the timer prior to the data transmission. The required transmission time should be within the energy signal transmission time, (Iqbal et al., Page 4, Section B), It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to modify Haque et al. by including that sending a backscatter signal based on a transmission resource, a backoff parameter or a time unit corresponding to the type or terminal group to which the terminal device belongs, (Iqbal et al., Page 4, Section B), in order to increase the communication range of the backscatter tag and decrease its bit error rate, since the backscatter tags use the existing RF signal, (Iqbal et al., Page 1, Introduction). Regarding claim 2, the method of claim 1, wherein the type to which the terminal device belongs comprises a first type and a second type, [Iqbal et al., Figure 1, Ref # Device 1 and Device 2], the terminal group to which the terminal device belongs comprises a first terminal group and a second terminal group, [Iqbal et al., Figure 1, Ref # Device 1 and Device 2], at least one of the first type or the first terminal group comprises an energy-constrained terminal device, [Iqbal et al., Figure 1, Ref # Device 2], and at least one of the second type or the second terminal group comprises terminal devices other than the energy-constrained terminal device, [Iqbal et al., Figure 1, Ref # Device 1]. 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the type to which the terminal device belongs comprises the first type and the second type, [Iqbal et al., Figure 1, Ref # Device 1 and Device 2], the terminal group to which the terminal device belongs comprises the first terminal group and the second terminal group, [Iqbal et al., Figure 1, Ref # Device 1 and Device 2], a transmission resource corresponding to the first type is different from a transmission resource corresponding to the second type, [Iqbal et al., Figure 7, backscatter communication differs based on devices with high or low throughput], and a transmission resource corresponding to the first terminal group is different from a transmission resource corresponding to the second terminal group, [Iqbal et al., Figure 7, backscatter communication differs based on devices with high or low throughput]. Regarding claim 4, the method of claim 3, wherein the transmission resource comprises at least one of a scheduling resource or a scheduling-free resource, [a transmission schedule associated with ZE reference signal(s) to be used for the purpose of cell measurements by the passive receiver may be fixed and known to the WTRU, (Haque et al., Paragraph 114)]. Regarding claims 7 and 17, a wireless communication method, comprising: sending scheduling information or a backoff parameter based on a first type and a second type or based on a first terminal group and a second terminal group, [a transmission schedule for processing of ZE reference signals may be comprised of either one or a combination of the following characteristics associated with a ZE reference signal waveform or one or more of its ZE waveform parts, (Haque et al., Paragraph 112)], Haque et al. fails to explicitly teach that the scheduling information or the backoff parameter is used for a terminal device to send a backscatter signal based on a transmission resource, the backoff parameter or a time unit corresponding to a type or terminal group to which the terminal device belongs, Iqbal et al. teaches that when collision happens the backoff window is increased as in wireless devices. Since some backscatter transmissions may occur during the backscatter phase, the last transmission of the backscatter tag is required to finish within the assigned time, Therefore, the backscatter tag needs to check the timer prior to the data transmission. The required transmission time should be within the energy signal transmission time, (Iqbal et al., Page 4, Section B), in order to increase the communication range of the backscatter tag and decrease its bit error rate, since the backscatter tags use the existing RF signal, (Iqbal et al., Page 1, Introduction). Regarding claim 8, the method of claim 7, wherein sending the scheduling information or the backoff parameter based on the first type and the second type or based on the first terminal group and the second terminal group comprises: sending scheduling signaling, wherein the scheduling signaling is used for indicating the transmission resource corresponding to the first type or the first terminal group, or the scheduling signaling is used for indicating the transmission resource corresponding to the second type or the second terminal group, [a transmission schedule for processing of ZE reference signals may be comprised of either one or a combination of the following characteristics associated with a ZE reference signal waveform or one or more of its ZE waveform parts, wherein the type is zero energy terminal type, (Haque et al., Paragraph 112)]. Regarding claim 15, the terminal device of claim 13, wherein determining the type or terminal group to which the terminal device belongs comprises: determining, based on signal strength measured by the terminal device, the type or terminal group to which the terminal device belongs, wherein determining, based on the signal strength measured by the terminal device, the type or terminal group to which the terminal device belongs comprises: if the signal strength or a signal voltage measured by the terminal device is less than or equal to a second threshold, determining, as the first type, the type to which the terminal device belongs or determining, as the first terminal group, the terminal group to which the terminal device belongs; otherwise, determining, as the second type, the type to which the terminal device belongs or determining, as the second terminal group, the terminal group to which the terminal device belongs, [the coordination may be such that part of ZE measurement reference signal that is used for cell ID identification and signal strength measurements may be transmitted in time multiplexing manner so that at any instant only a single cell transmits the reference signal part corresponding to cell ID and the strength measurement sequence, (Haque et al., Paragraph 146)]. Regarding claim 18, the communication device of claim 17, wherein sending the scheduling information or the backoff parameter based on the first type and the second type or based on the first terminal group and the second terminal group comprises: sending scheduling signaling for scheduling the transmission resource corresponding to the first type or the first terminal group on a time unit corresponding to the first type or the first terminal group, [a transmission schedule for processing of ZE reference signals may be comprised of either one or a combination of the following characteristics associated with a ZE reference signal waveform or one or more of its ZE waveform parts, wherein the type is zero energy terminal type, (Haque et al., Paragraph 112)], and sending scheduling signaling for scheduling the transmission resource corresponding to the second type or the second terminal group on a time unit corresponding to the second type or the second terminal group, [a transmission schedule for processing of ZE reference signals may be comprised of either one or a combination of the following characteristics associated with a ZE reference signal waveform or one or more of its ZE waveform parts, wherein the type is zero energy terminal type, (Haque et al., Paragraph 112)]. Regarding claim 19, the communication device of claim 18, wherein the processor is configured to invoke and run the computer-executable instructions stored in the memory to perform further operation of: sending indication information, wherein the indication information is used for indicating the time unit corresponding to the type or terminal group to which the terminal device belongs, wherein the indication information is carried in at least one of the following: scheduling signaling of terminal devices other than the terminal device, public signaling, or system information, [When the WTRU camps on a cell in RRCJDLE state or in RRCJNACTIVE state, the WTRU may perform any of the following actions: receive system information (e.g., system information block (SIB)) from the PLMN; establish an RRC connection or resume a suspended RRC connection, (Haque et al., Paragraph 97)]. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5, 6, 9-12, 14, 16 and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Shukri Taha whose telephone number is 571-270-1921. The examiner can normally be reached on 8:30am-5pm Mon-Fri. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Avellino can be reached on 571-272-3905. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /SHUKRI TAHA/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2478
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 29, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604204
APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR HETEROGENEOUS COVERAGE AND USE CASES IN A QUASI-LICENSED WIRELESS SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598472
DEVICE, METHOD, APPARATUS AND COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM FOR NETWORK SLICING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587925
EFFICIENT CONFIGURING OF A NON-TERRESTRIAL NETWORK CONNECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581472
ACTIVATION INDICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, FREQUENCY BAND ACTIVATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574906
REPETITION FACTOR ADAPTATION FOR MINI-SLOT-BASED TRANSPORT BLOCK TRANSMISSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+18.7%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 881 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month