Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/401,244

Secured Plug-in Smart Device

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 29, 2023
Examiner
MOUNTAIN, JEFFREY WIGHTMAN
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Jasco Products Company LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
40 granted / 46 resolved
+19.0% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
58
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
39.3%
-0.7% vs TC avg
§102
36.9%
-3.1% vs TC avg
§112
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 46 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-12 are pending. Claim Objections Claims 2 and 6 objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 2, line 2: “a housing of the electoral device” should read “a housing of the electrical device” Claim 6, line 9: “a housing of the electoral device” should read “a housing of the electrical device” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 4, 10, and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Baldwin (US Patent 11,563,876). Regarding claim 1, Baldwin discloses a plug-in electrical device (Col. 6, line 5, electrical wall plate 100), comprising: an electrical device (Col. 6, line 40, electrical device 10); an electrical plug (Col. 8, line 5, power connector 160); a mount (Col. 8, line 12, face plate 102), whereas the mount secures to an outlet (see Fig. 3); the mount is retractable (see Fig. 3); and the mount is comprised of an aperture (Col. 8, line 48, screw openings 151) configured to allow the passage of a body of a wall mounting screw (Col. 8, line 49, box mounting screw 152), and the mount is configured to be secured to the outlet by a head of the wall mounting screw (see Fig 1A). Regarding claim 4, Baldwin discloses the plug-in electrical device of claim 1, further comprising: the plug-in electrical device configured to plug-in to one receptacle of a dual-receptacle outlet (Col. 9, line 3, electrical box 3), whereas the plug-in electrical device is configured to utilize only one receptacle in a dual-receptacle outlet (see Fig. 3); and the plug-in electrical device configured to allow access of a second receptacle in the dual-receptacle outlet (see Figs. 1A-3). Regarding claim 10, Baldwin discloses a plug-in electrical device (Col. 6, line 5, electrical wall plate 100), comprising: an electrical device (Col. 6, line 40, electrical device 10); an electrical plug (Col. 8, line 5, power connector 160); a mount (Col. 8, line 12, face plate 102), whereas the mount secures to an outlet (see Fig. 3); and the mount is comprised of an aperture (Col. 8, line 48, screw openings 151) configured to allow the passage of a body of a wall mounting screw (Col. 8, line 49, box mounting screw 152), and the mount is configured to be secured to the outlet by a head of the wall mounting screw (see Fig. 1A). Regarding claim 12, Baldwin discloses the plug-in electrical device of claim 10, further comprising: the plug-in electrical device configured to plug-in to one receptacle of a dual-receptacle outlet (Col. 9, line 3, electrical box 3), whereas the plug-in electrical device is configured to utilize only one receptacle in a dual-receptacle outlet (see Fig. 3); and the plug-in electrical device configured to allow access of a second receptacle in the dual-receptacle outlet (see Figs. 1A-3). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-9 allowed. Claims 2-3, 5, and 11 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding claim 2, allowability resides, at least in part, with the prior art not fairly showing, suggesting, or teaching the plug-in electrical device of claim 1, further comprising: a housing of the electoral device; a mount tab; at least one mount rib; the housing of the electrical device comprised of a slot configured to accommodate the mount tab; and whereas the at least one mount rib configured to lock the mount into a full closed position, or a full open position, as recited in claim 2. These limitations are neither taught nor suggested by the prior art of record taken alone or in combination. Regarding claim 3, allowability resides, at least in part, with the prior art not fairly showing, suggesting, or teaching the plug-in electrical device of claim 1, further comprising: a smart plug-in device, as recited in claim 3. These limitations are neither taught nor suggested by the prior art of record taken alone or in combination. Regarding claim 5, allowability resides, at least in part, with the prior art not fairly showing, suggesting, or teaching the plug-in electrical device of claim 1, further comprising: a housing of the electrical device; a mount tab; the mount tab is configured to lock into a full closed position or a full open position; the housing of the electrical device comprised of a slot configured to accommodate the mount tab; and whereas the mount tab is configured to be fully enclosed within the housing of the electrical device in the full closed position, and a top of the mount is configured to be level with a top of the housing of the electrical device in the full closed position, as recited in claim 5. These limitations are neither taught nor suggested by the prior art of record taken alone or in combination. Regarding claim 6, allowability resides with the prior art not fairly showing, suggesting, or teaching a plug-in electrical device, comprising: an electrical device; an electrical plug; a mount, whereas the mount secures to an outlet; the mount is retractable; the mount is comprised of an aperture configured to allow the passage of a body of a wall mounting screw, and the mount is configured to be secured to the outlet by a head of the wall mounting screw; a housing of the electoral device; a mount tab; at least one mount rib; the housing of the electrical device comprised of a slot configured to accommodate the mount tab; and whereas the at least one mount rib configured to lock the mount into a full closed position, or a full open position, as recited in claim 6. These limitations are neither taught nor suggested by the prior art of record taken alone or in combination. Claims 7-9 are dependent on claim 6 and are therefore allowable for the same reasons. Regarding claim 11, allowability resides, at least in part, with the prior art not fairly showing, suggesting, or teaching the plug-in electrical device of claim 10, further comprising: a smart plug-in device, as recited in claim 11. These limitations are neither taught nor suggested by the prior art of record taken alone or in combination. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892 for details. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jeffrey Mountain whose telephone number is (703)756-1939. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9:30am - 6:30pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tulsidas Patel can be reached at (571)272-2098. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEFFREY MOUNTAIN/Examiner, Art Unit 2834 /TULSIDAS C PATEL/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 29, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 19, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597717
Housing Assembly for a Plier-Operated Insulation-Displacement Connector
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597738
MECHANISM FOR CONNECTING AND DISCONNECTING CLUSTER RF CONNECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592514
ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12580335
RECEPTACLE AND CONNECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580327
CRIMP TERMINAL, TERMINAL COUPLED BODY AND CONNECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+17.1%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 46 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month