Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/402,229

SYSTEM AND METHOD TO TRACK USAGE OF SURGICAL INSTRUMENT

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 02, 2024
Priority
May 20, 2016 — provisional 62/339,151 +2 more
Examiner
FARAH, AHMED M
Art Unit
3792
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Cilag GmbH International
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
1047 granted / 1330 resolved
+8.7% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
1343
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§103
46.5%
+6.5% vs TC avg
§102
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
§112
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1330 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I (Claims 21-31) in the reply filed on 12/01/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 32-40 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 12/01/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 21-31are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Independent claim 1 recites a memory configured to store “a set of device life management characteristics” in lines 7-8. The applicant’s specification merely teaches in paragraph [0007] “While a variety of systems have been made and used for surgical device lifecycle management, it is believed that no one prior to the inventor(s) has made or used the technology as described herein.” However, the scope of the claimed set of device life management characteristics cannot be determined from the claim language or the specification. Therefore, this limitation renders indefinite Claim 1 and dependent claims 2-31. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 22 further recites a processor configured to reduce functionality of the surgical feature when the usage ratio exceeds an “upper abnormal use threshold’ or when the use ration is below a lower abnormal use threshold.” However the upper abnormal use threshold” or the lower abnormal use threshold cannot be determined from the claims or the specification. This limitation further renders indefinite claim 22 and dependent claims 23-25. Appropriate correction is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 26-31 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Griffiths et al. Pub. No. US 2014/0052154disclose a surgical instrument comprising: an end effector, wherein the end effector comprises a surgical feature, a generator connection, a user input, wherein the user input is operable to activate the surgical feature of the end effector, a processor, and a memory, wherein the memory is configured to store a set of device life management characteristics, and wherein the processor is configured to enable or disable the surgical feature based upon the set of device life management characteristics as claimed (see Fig. 1, and Pars. 11, 12, 15-21). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AHMED M FARAH whose telephone number is (571)272-4765. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri. 9:30AM -10:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Niketa Patel can be reached at 571-272-4156. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AHMED M FARAH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3792
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 02, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 01, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12672914
DEVICE FOR REAL-TIME NON-CONTACT SKIN TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12661096
POWER CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS FOR SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS AND BATTERIES
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653718
OPHTHALMOLOGICAL PATIENT INTERFACE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12636190
LASER THERAPY FOR TREATMENT AND PREVENTION OF EYE DISEASES
2y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629246
METHOD FOR PATTERNED PLASMA-MEDIATED MODIFICATION OF THE CRYSTALLINE LENS
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+19.0%)
3y 4m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1330 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month