Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/403,619

COMPLIANT MECHANISM FOR ENERGY HARVESTING GENERATOR ACTUATION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 03, 2024
Priority
Jan 04, 2023 — provisional 63/437,116
Examiner
JIMENEZ, ANTHONY R
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Wepower Technologies LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
972 granted / 1101 resolved
+20.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1119
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
43.4%
+3.4% vs TC avg
§102
28.9%
-11.1% vs TC avg
§112
25.6%
-14.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1101 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-12 are pending in the current application. Drawings The drawings are objected to because view numbers must be larger than the numbers used for reference characters. 37 C.F.R. 1.84(u)(2). Additionally, regarding FIG. 11B, it is not clear to which item the lead line for “1001” is directed towards. 37 C.F.R. 1.84(l). Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, Applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Objections Regarding Claim 1, line 1, it appears that there are two spaces between the terms “actuation” and “mechanism.” Regarding Claim 1, line 8, it appears that there are two spaces between the terms “one” and “actuation.” Regarding Claim 4, line 2, it appears that the term “requires” should be changed to “requires an.” Regarding Claim 9, line 7, it appears that there are two spaces between the terms “actuation” and “component.” Regarding Claim 12, line 1, it appears that there are two spaces between the terms “actuation” and “mechanism.” Regarding Claim 12, line 8, it appears that the language “between the” should be changed to “between.” Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (B) CONCLUSION. - The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Specifically, Claim 1 is rejected since there is no antecedent basis for the language “two sidewalls” recited in the 2nd to the last line. Regarding Claim 1, the last line, the language “compliant materials” is indefinite. Regarding Claim 5, line 2, there is no antecedent basis for the term “assembly.” Regarding Claim 7, ll. 2-3, there is no antecedent basis for the language “two sidewalls.” Regarding Claim 7, line 3, it is not clear if the language “corner members” refers to that recited in Claim 1, line 4 or line 5. Regarding Claim 9, line 8, there is no antecedent basis for the language “two sidewalls.” Regarding Claim 9, line 9, the language “compliant materials” is indefinite. Regarding Claim 9, the 3rd to the last line, there is no antecedent basis for the language “compressed frame.” Regarding Claim 12, the 3rd to the last line, the language “electromagnetic applications” is indefinite. Regarding Claim 9, the 2nd to the last line, there is no antecedent basis for the language “actuation component.” Regarding Claim 12, the 2nd to the last line, it is not clear if the language “at least one flexure” refers to that recited in line 6. Regarding Claim 12, the last line, the language “compliant materials” is indefinite. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to Applicant's disclosure. Beasley (U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2014/0218305 A1) discloses a compressible frame comprising an actuation mechanism but does not disclose the claimed first sidewall corner members spaced apart from second sidewall corner members. Mann et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 11,798,403 B2) discloses a compressible frame comprising an actuation mechanism but does not disclose that first sidewall corner members are adjacent second sidewall corner members in a compressed configuration. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTHONY R. JIMENEZ whose telephone number is 313-446-6518. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Thursday, 1030am - 9pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, Applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Luebke, can be reached at (571) 272-2009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTHONY R JIMENEZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 03, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §112
May 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Aug 04, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706255
SWITCHING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A SWITCHING DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706260
LONG-TYPE KEY STRUCTURE
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700551
BUTTON STRUCTURE AND WEARABLE DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12688987
BIDIRECTIONAL OPERATION MECHANISM FOR SWITCHING DEVICE AND SWITCHING DEVICE ASSEMBLY
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12680607
SHIFT DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+6.9%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1101 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month