Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/403,970

CONDUCTIVE LINE CONTACT REGIONS HAVING MULTIPLE MULTI-DIRECTION CONDUCTIVE LINES AND STAIRCASE CONDUCTIVE LINE CONTACT STRUCTURES FOR SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 04, 2024
Priority
Oct 01, 2020 — continuation of 11/903,183
Examiner
SHOOK, DANIEL P
Art Unit
2896
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Micron Technology, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
559 granted / 643 resolved
+18.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
652
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
72.6%
+32.6% vs TC avg
§102
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
§112
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 643 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of invention I in the reply filed on 23 March 2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that no serious search and/or examination burden exists. This is not found persuasive because, as cited in the restriction requirement, burden is established in that there is a separate classification of the subject matter and a separate field of search as the device claims do not require queries to the selective removal, the guidelines for establishing burden being set forth in MPEP 808.02. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 13-17 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 23 March 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee et al. (US 2019/0164985 A1). Regarding claim 1, Lee discloses a memory device (Fig 14-17), comprising: a vertical stack of layers (SS1, SS2) formed from repeating iterations of a group of layers (L1, L2, L3 & L4), the group of layers comprising: a first dielectric material layer (ILD1), a semiconductor material layer (SL), and a second dielectric material layer, the second dielectric material layer having a conductive line (CL1, which is also the bit line BL) formed in a horizontal plane therein; and the vertical stack of layers having a plurality of interconnection locations (CNT1, as shown in Fig 14, there is contact to the BL in L2 and one to the BL in L4) with a corresponding access depth to a corresponding conductive line at corresponding distances from a reference location of the vertical stack, wherein the corresponding access depth is different for each of the plurality of interconnection locations. Regarding claim 10, Lee discloses that the memory device is a three-dimensional (3D) dynamic random access memory device (¶26-¶31, a three-dimensional memory device using capacitors as the data storage element is a 3D-DRAM). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 18-20 are allowed. Claims 2-9, 11 and 12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: While Lee discloses the memory device of claim 1, neither Lee nor other prior art discloses the memory device having the claimed 3-layer structure with the horizontal conductive line in the second dielectric material layer with the access devices being electrically coupled to the conductive line at the interconnection locations as required by claim 2, or having the first through third portions as required by claims 11 and 18. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL P SHOOK whose telephone number is (571)270-7890. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 am - 5:00 pm, Mon-Fri. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, WILLIAM KRAIG can be reached at (571)272-8660. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL P SHOOK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2896
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 04, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 26, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 26, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641817
NITRIDE SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641952
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641866
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH INTEGRATED JUNCTION FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTOR AND ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641867
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH INTEGRATED JUNCTION FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTOR AND ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635329
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+8.5%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 643 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month