Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/404,010

RECORDING MEDIUM AND INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jan 04, 2024
Priority
Jul 05, 2021 — JP 2021-111855 +1 more
Examiner
LIDDLE, JAY TRENT
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Sega Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
349 granted / 607 resolved
-12.5% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
643
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
§103
69.9%
+29.9% vs TC avg
§102
10.2%
-29.8% vs TC avg
§112
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 607 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Forza Horizon 4 as evidenced by “Forza Horizon 4 – How Car Mastery Works & FORZATHON SHOP” (herein after “Mastery” and “Forza Horizon 4 Beginner’s Guide | Tips & Tricks” (herein after “Guide”) in view of “The Many Ways to Show the Player How It’s Done With In-Game Tutorials” (hereinafter “Tutorials”). With regard to claim 1, Mastery discloses a non-transitory computer readable recording medium storing instructions for an information processing device that comprises a control device connected via a network to a terminal device that comprises a controller and a display, the instructions causing the control device to execute: causing the controller to execute a challenge game in which the character attempts to achieve a target, in a specific order (1:25-2:10); awarding a skill point to the character based on an execution state of the training game or the challenge game (1:25-2:10); causing the display to display a skill acquisition screen in which the character acquires one or more skills from among acquirable skills of the character by consuming the skill point (1:25-2:10); when the character has acquired a skill that matches a condition included in the challenge game, activating the skill to be exhibited in the challenge game; and causing the display to display, on the skill acquisition screen, information on a condition included in a subsequently-executed challenge game (1:25-2:10; wherein characters go throughout the game and earn skill points based on things that they do; then they are able to take those skill points and by skills in the shop as shown that are then available in their car for use). Mastery does not appear to be explicitly clear about having a training game per se. However, Tutorials teaches in a training scenario for training a character, a training game in which the character attempts to achieve a target, in a specific order (Method: The Tutorial Room; wherein it discusses a special room to guide players on how to achieve certain gameplay events). With regard to claim 2, Mastery discloses a non-transitory computer readable recording medium storing instructions for an information processing device that comprises a control device connected via a network to a terminal device that comprises a controller and a display, the instructions causing the control device to execute: causing a controller to execute, a challenge game in which the character attempts to achieve a target, in a specific order; awarding a skill point to the character based on an execution state of the training game or the challenge game (1:25-2:10); displaying a skill acquisition screen in which the character acquires one or more skills from among acquirable skills of the character by consuming the skill point (1:25-2:10); when the character has acquired a skill that matches a condition included in the challenge game, activating the skill to be exhibited in the challenge game (1:25-2:10); and causing the display to display, on the skill acquisition screen, a list of acquirable skills, wherein in that list, acquirable skills that match and acquirable skills that do not match a condition included in a subsequently-executed challenge game are displayed distinguishably from each other (1:25-2:10 as discussed above and additionally that you can see that some skills are highlighted and other skills are grayed out). Mastery does not appear to be explicitly clear about having a training game per se. However, Tutorials teaches in a training scenario for training a character, a training game in which the character attempts to achieve a target, in a specific order (Method: The Tutorial Room; wherein it discusses a special room to guide players on how to achieve certain gameplay events). With regard to claim 3, Mastery discloses wherein the instructions further cause the control device to add, to the acquirable skills, a skill selected with a predetermined probability through execution of the training game or the challenge game (1:25-2:10 wherein the player can see the cost of the various skills they can buy and thus know a probability of what they can afford). With regard to claim 4, Mastery discloses wherein the predetermined probability changes depending on a support character used by a player in the training scenario (1:25-3:15; wherein they discuss different skill trees for different cars). With regard to claim 5, the combination of Guide and Tutorials teaches wherein the instructions further cause the control device to restrict continuation of the training scenario when a performance of the character in the challenge game does not satisfy a clearance condition of the challenge game (Guide at 07:00-07:30 wherein there is discussion of a rival event; Tutorials at Method: The Tutorial Room). With regard to claim 6, Guide discloses wherein the challenge game is a race in which the character competes in a race course, and the clearance condition is to place within a specific finish order (07:00-07:30). With regard to claim 7, Guide discloses teaches wherein the condition included in the subsequently-executed challenge game includes at least one of a race course attribute, a race distance, a lap direction, a season, and a weather (07:00-07:30). Claims 8 and 9 are mirrored to claims 1 and 2 and are rejected in like manner. It would have been obvious to combine the teachings of Tutorials with the game of Forza Horizon 4 in order to give players a chance to learn skills in a separate room before trying them in “actual gameplay” itself thus allowing the player to see how the game works and improving the player abilities (See Tutorials at Method: The Tutorial Room). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure can be found on the Notice of References Cited. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jay Liddle whose telephone number is (571)270-1226. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dmitry Suhol can be reached at 571-272-4430. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Jay Trent Liddle/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 04, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §103
Jan 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 04, 2026
Response Filed
May 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594502
CONTENT STREAM PROCESSING
2y 10m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589314
RECORDING MEDIUM AND INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE THAT GUIDE USER TO UTILIZE PLURAL FUNCTIONS
3y 0m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585622
METHODS AND SYSTEMS PROVIDING NFT CHARACTERS ON A BLOCKCHAIN
2y 8m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582913
SYSTEM, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS
2y 10m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576335
SELECTIVE GAME LOGIC PROCESSING BY A GAME SERVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+23.1%)
3y 7m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 607 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month