Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/404,043

REDUCED ERROR CODE CORRECTION POWER FOR MLC CODEWORDS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 04, 2024
Priority
Jan 12, 2023 — provisional 63/479,655
Examiner
CHAUDRY, MUJTABA M
Art Unit
2112
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Micron Technology Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
706 granted / 836 resolved
+29.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
864
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
§103
32.5%
-7.5% vs TC avg
§102
5.1%
-34.9% vs TC avg
§112
33.7%
-6.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 836 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Applicants’ response filed 5/20/2026 has been considered. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Application is hereby withdrawn from allowance. Claims 7-26 are rejected. Application is pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 7-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. For example, claim 7 recites: PNG media_image1.png 237 831 media_image1.png Greyscale The claim states, “…correcting a first bit error in the first codeword; detecting second bit errors in the second codeword…” This limitation falsely assumes that the first codeword will definitely have a first bit error and that the second codeword will have multiple bit errors. How can these errors be true all the time? They can’t. Therefore these limitations are indefinite. Then the claim states, “…inverting bits associated with the second bit errors; and correcting the second bit errors with an error code correction ECC algorithm.” This limitation lacks clarity. If the bits that are in error are inverted, then by definition those bits are corrected. What is the function of the next limitation of correcting the second bit errors with an error code correction ECC algorithm? Is the correction done by inverting the bits or is the correction done after the inverting? Essential elements are missing from the claims. Independent claims 14 and 21 are rejected for similar reasons. Respective dependent claims are rejected at least based on dependency. Corrections are requested. Conclusion It is the Examiner’s conclusion that the claims of the present application, as presented, are not clear. Pertinent prior arts cited for Applicants’ review. Applicants are encouraged to formulate claims that clearly define the novelty of the application. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MUJTABA M CHAUDRY whose telephone number is (571)272-3817. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Albert DeCady can be reached at 571-272-3819. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MUJTABA M. CHAUDRY Primary Examiner Art Unit 2112 /MUJTABA M CHAUDRY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2112
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 04, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 20, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 22, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12675362
MANAGING STATUS OUTPUT
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12670052
MEMORY SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12659073
ERROR DETECTION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS USING SECTIONAL REDUNDANCY CHECK INFORMATION
7y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12652134
COMMUNICATION CONTROL METHOD
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12647202
ADAPTATION OF THE CRC CODE LENGTH FOR 3GPP NR
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+3.6%)
2y 7m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 836 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month