Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/404,319

DOOR ASSEMBLY HAVING A SOFT BOTTOMED DOOR PANEL AND SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 04, 2024
Examiner
HANES JR., JOHN
Art Unit
3634
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Rytec Corporation
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
47%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 47% of resolved cases
47%
Career Allow Rate
51 granted / 108 resolved
-4.8% vs TC avg
Strong +39% interview lift
Without
With
+38.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
150
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
48.1%
+8.1% vs TC avg
§102
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
§112
23.6%
-16.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 108 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 02/02/2026 has been entered. Drawings Cancellation of fig 24 in the reply dated 02/02/2026 is noted. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: The amendment dated 12/04/2024 amended the specification with references to fig 24. Due to the cancellation of fig 24 in the reply dated 02/02/2026, references thereto in the specification should also be removed. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Objections Claim 19 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 19 lacks a comma separating the preamble from the body of the claim. Claim 19 also recites in part, at the end of the claim “the different fastener fastens to the first keder or the second keder.” This appears to be redundant Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-5, and 8-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Korean Patent 10-0698757 – Jeon Byeong-Seok (a copy and translation of the document was provided in the Office Action dated 08/20/2021 in the priority case 16/698,409.) in view of PG Pub. US 2015/0136334 A1 – Iglesias Ballester. Regarding claim 1. Jeon Byeong-Seok discloses an overhead roll-up door assembly (fig 1), comprising: a door panel having a first face (11, fig 1), a second face, a top edge, a bottom edge, a first vertical edge, and a second vertical edge (See annotated fig 1); a first keder (See annotated fig 5) aligned along the first vertical edge, the first keder comprising a first elongated body (215, fig 6) surrounded by a first material (See fig 6), wherein a first portion of the first material is coupled to the first face of the door panel and a second portion of the first material is coupled to the second face of the door panel (See fig 6; see also figs 7-9); a second keder (See annotated fig 5) aligned along the second vertical edge, the second keder comprising a second elongated body (215, fig 6) surrounded by a second material (See fig 6), wherein a first portion of the second material is coupled to the first face of the door panel and a second portion of the second material is coupled to the second face of the door panel (See fig 6; see also figs 7-9); a first column of drive teeth (21, fig 6) fixed to the first keder (See annotated fig 5), wherein at least one drive tooth (210, fig 6) from the first column of drive teeth (21, fig 6) is fixed to the first keder (See annotated fig 5) using a fastener (217, fig 6) which extends through the at least one drive tooth (See fig 6) from the first column of drive teeth (See fig 6); and a second column of drive teeth (21, as in fig 6) fixed to the second keder (See annotated fig 5), wherein at least one drive tooth (210, as in fig 6) from the second column of drive teeth (21, as in fig 6) is fixed to the second keder (See annotated fig 5) using a second fastener (as at 217, fig 6) which extends through the at least one drive tooth from the second column of drive teeth (See fig 6). Jeon Byeong-Seok does not explicitly disclose a first sheet of material, the first elongated body extending adjacent to the first vertical edge of the door panel and the first sheet of material being wrapped around an outer portion of the first elongated body and the first vertical edge of the door panel, wherein a first portion of the first sheet of material is coupled to the first face of the door panel and a second portion of the first sheet of material is coupled to the second face of the door panel; or a second sheet of material, the second elongated body extending adjacent to the second vertical edge of the door panel and the second sheet of material being wrapped around an outer portion of the second elongated body and the second vertical edge of the door panel, wherein a first portion of the second sheet of material is coupled to the first face of the door panel and a second portion of the second sheet of material is coupled to the second face of the door panel, or Fasteners extending perpendicular to the first portion and the second portion of the first sheet of material, wherein the fastener and the second fastener are positioned closer to a center portion of the door panel than the first and second elongated bodies, respectively. However, Iglesias Ballester teaches a first sheet of material (7, fig 4), the first elongated body (8, fig 4) extending adjacent to the first vertical edge (See fig 2) of the door panel (2, fig 4) and the first sheet of material being wrapped around an outer portion of the first elongated body and the first vertical edge of the door panel (See fig 4), wherein a first portion of the first sheet of material is coupled to the first face of the door panel (See fig 4) and a second portion of the first sheet of material is coupled to the second face of the door panel (See fig 4); and a second sheet of material (as at 7, fig 4), the second elongated body extending adjacent to the second vertical edge of the door panel (2, as in fig 4) and the second sheet of material being wrapped around an outer portion of the second elongated body (as at 8 in fig 4) and the second vertical edge of the door panel (2, as in fig 4), wherein a first portion of the second sheet of material is coupled to the first face of the door panel (as in fig 4) and a second portion of the second sheet of material is coupled to the second face of the door panel (as in fig 4), and Fasteners (14, fig 2) extending perpendicular (see fig 5) to the first portion and the second portion of the first sheet of material (see fig 5), wherein the fastener and the second fastener are positioned closer to a center portion of the door panel than the first and second elongated bodies (see fig 5), respectively (Examiner notes that it is clear via the disclosure that the applicant intends to claim "wherein the fastener is positioned closer to a center portion of the door panel than the first elongated body is to a center portion of the door panel;", and the limitation is interpreted as such.). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art, with a reasonable expectation of success, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the panel of Jeon Byeong-Seok with the keder construction and fastener orientation of Iglesias Ballester. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to yield the predictable result of improving the centering of the panel within the opening of the door, and allowing for easier servicing or replacement of the drive teeth. PNG media_image1.png 568 778 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 300 502 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2. The combination of Jeon Byeong-Seok and Iglesias Ballester teaches all limitations of claim 1. Jeon Byeong-Seok further discloses the first elongated body (215, fig 6) and the second elongated body (215, fig 6) comprise a non-stretch material having a static length (See second paragraph, page 7 of applicant supplied translation). Regarding claim 3. The combination of Jeon Byeong-Seok and Iglesias Ballester teaches all limitations of claim 1. Jeon Byeong-Seok further discloses the first column (21, fig 4) of drive teeth (210, fig 6) comprises a first plurality of individual drive teeth (See figs 4 and 6) and the second column (21, fig 4) of drive teeth (210, fig 6) comprises a second plurality of drive teeth (See figs 4 and 6). Regarding claim 4. The combination of Jeon Byeong-Seok and Iglesias Ballester teaches all limitations of claim 3. Jeon Byeong-Seok further discloses each individual drive tooth (210, fig 6) in the first plurality of drive teeth and each individual drive tooth (210, fig 6) in the second plurality of drive teeth comprise a fastener channel (See channel for accepting fastener 217 in fig 6). Regarding claim 5. The combination of Jeon Byeong-Seok and Iglesias Ballester teaches all limitations of claim 4. Jeon Byeong-Seok further discloses each individual drive tooth (210, fig 6) from the first plurality of individual drive teeth is fastened to the first elongated body (215, fig 6) with a fastener (217, fig 6) and each individual drive tooth (210, fig 6) from the second plurality of individual drive teeth is fastened to the second elongated body (215, fig 6) with a fastener (217, fig 6). Regarding claim 8. The combination of Jeon Byeong-Seok and Iglesias Ballester teaches all limitations of claim 3. Jeon Byeong-Seok further discloses each individual drive tooth (210, fig 6) in the first column of drive teeth and each individual drive tooth (210, fig 6) in the second column of drive teeth comprise an interior channel (seen best in fig 6, seen also in fig 5, and 7-9), each interior channel being open and having a dimension to match an exterior dimension of the first elongated body and surrounding material or the second elongated body and surrounding material (See figs 5-9). Regarding claim 9. The combination of Jeon Byeong-Seok and Iglesias Ballester teaches all limitations of claim 8. Jeon Byeong-Seok further discloses each individual drive tooth (210, fig 6) in the first column of drive teeth and each individual drive tooth (210, fig 6) in the second column of drive teeth comprise an opening channel (See annotated fig 7), the opening channel being sized and having a dimension at least as large as a thickness of the door panel (11, fig 7), the first portion of the first material and the second portion of the first material, or a thickness of the door panel, the first portion of the second material and the second portion of the second material (See annotated fig 7). PNG media_image3.png 756 1108 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claim 10. The combination of Jeon Byeong-Seok and Iglesias Ballester teaches all limitations of claim 9. Jeon Byeong-Seok further discloses the opening channel (See annotated fig 7) of each individual drive tooth (210, fig 6) is configured to pinch the door panel, the first portion of the first material and the second portion of the first material, or the door panel, the first portion of the second material and the second portion of the second material when each individual drive tooth is engaged by an outside body (See fig 7). Regarding claim 11. The combination of Jeon Byeong-Seok and Iglesias Ballester teaches all limitations of claim 3. Jeon Byeong-Seok further discloses each individual drive tooth (210, fig 4) in the first column drive teeth are configured and positioned to allow the first column of drive teeth to flex in a first direction (as they wrap drum 3 and sprocket 17, fig 4) and prevent the first column of drive teeth from flexing in a second direction (as sag is prevented between drum 3 and sprocket 17, fig 4). Regarding claim 12. The combination of Jeon Byeong-Seok and Iglesias Ballester teaches all limitations of claim 3. Jeon Byeong-Seok further discloses each individual drive tooth (210, fig 4) in the second column drive teeth are configured and positioned to allow the second column of drive teeth to flex in a first direction (as they wrap drum 3 and sprocket 17, fig 4) and prevent the second column of drive teeth from flexing in a second direction (as sag is prevented between drum 3 and sprocket 17, fig 4). Regarding claim 13. The combination of Jeon Byeong-Seok and Iglesias Ballester teaches all limitations of claim 1. The combination does not explicitly teach the first portion of the first material and the second portion of the first material and the first portion of the second material and the second portion of the second material are fixed to the door panel using adhesive. However, Jeon Byeong-Seok does teach at least two strips of roll material (110, fig 5) extending along a length of the door panel, each strip being adhered (See 5th paragraph on page 7 of applicant supplied translation) to the door panel. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art, with a reasonable expectation of success, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to further modify the combination of Jeon Byeong-Seok and Iglesias Ballester by using adhesive to fix the first portion of the first material and the second portion of the first material and the first portion of the second material and the second portion of the second material to the door panel as suggested by the use of adhesive to attach the roll material to the panel. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to provide keders that would not fall off when changing out drive teeth as suggested by fig 6. Regarding claim 14. The combination of Jeon Byeong-Seok and Iglesias Ballester teaches all limitations of claim 1. Jeon Byeong-Seok further discloses at least two strips of roll material (110, fig 5) extending along a length of the door panel, each strip being adhered (See 5th paragraph on page 7 of applicant supplied translation) to the door panel, wherein a thickness of the door panel and each strip of roll material being greater than a thickness of the first column of drive teeth and a thickness of the second column of drive teeth (see fig 5). Regarding claim 15. The combination of Jeon Byeong-Seok and Iglesias Ballester teaches all limitations of claim 1. Jeon Byeong-Seok further discloses the door panel (11, fig 1) has a greater length (diagonally, see fig 1) than the first keder and a greater length than the second keder. Regarding claim 16. The combination of Jeon Byeong-Seok and Iglesias Ballester teaches all limitations of claim 9. The combination, in Iglesias Ballester, further teaches the fastener channel (See fig 5) of each drive tooth (2a, fig 5) extends transverse to, and across, the opening channel (Between halves of 2a, see fig 5) of each drive tooth. Regarding claim 17. The combination of Jeon Byeong-Seok and Iglesias Ballester teaches all limitations of claim 16. The combination, in Iglesias Ballester, further teaches the fastener (14, fig 5) fastening the at least one drive tooth (2a, fig 5) from the first column of drive teeth (See fig 2) to the first keder (8, fig 4) and the door panel (2, fig 5) bridges the opening channel (Between halves of 2a, see fig 5) of the at least one drive tooth from the first column of drive teeth (See figs 2 and 5), and the second fastener (as at 14, fig 5) fastening the at least one drive tooth (as at 2a, fig 5) from the second column of drive teeth (See fig 3) to the second keder (as at 8, fig 4) and the door panel (2, fig 5) bridges the opening channel (Between halves of 2a, see fig 5) of the at least one drive tooth from the second column of drive teeth (See figs 2 and 5). Regarding claim 18. Jeon Byeong-Seok discloses an overhead roll-up door assembly (fig 1), comprising: a door panel having a first face (11, fig 1), a second face, a top edge, a bottom edge, a first vertical edge, and a second vertical edge (See annotated fig 1); a first keder (See annotated fig 5) aligned along the first vertical edge, the first keder comprising a first elongated body (215, fig 6) the first elongated body extending adjacent to the first vertical edge of the door panel (See fig 5); a second keder (See annotated fig 5) aligned along the second vertical edge, the second keder comprising a second elongated body (215, fig 6) the second elongated body extending adjacent to the second vertical edge of the door panel (See fig 5); a plurality of drive teeth, each drive tooth comprising an interior channel extending vertically through a middle portion of each drive tooth; an opening channel providing outside access to the interior channel; and a fastener channel, Jeon Byeong-Seok does not explicitly disclose a first sheet of material, the first sheet of material being wrapped around an outer portion of the first elongated body and the first vertical edge of the door panel; a second sheet of material, the second sheet of material being wrapped around an outer portion of the second elongated body and the second vertical edge of the door panel; the fastener channel extending transverse to, and across, the opening channel; wherein a first portion of the plurality of drive teeth are fixed to the first keder such that the fastener channel of each drive tooth is transverse to the first keder and the first face of the door panel and the second face of the door panel, and the fastener channel is positioned closer to a center portion of the door panel than the interior channel; and a second portion of the plurality of drive teeth are fixed to the second keder such that the fastener channel of each drive tooth is transverse to the second keder and the first face of the door panel and the second face of the door panel, and the fastener channel is positioned closer to a center portion of the door panel than the interior channel. However, Iglesias Ballester teaches a first sheet of material (7, fig 4), the first sheet of material being wrapped around an outer portion (See fig 4) of the first elongated body (8, fig 4) and the first vertical edge (See fig 2) of the door panel (2, fig 4); a second sheet of material (as at 7 in fig 4), the second sheet of material being wrapped around an outer portion (See fig 4) of the second elongated body (as at 8, fig 4) and the second vertical edge (See fig 3) of the door panel (2, fig 4); the fastener channel (See at 14 in fig 2) extending transverse to, and across, the opening channel (See fig 5); wherein a first portion of the plurality of drive teeth (2a, fig 5) are fixed to the first keder (8, fig 4) such that the fastener channel (See at 14 in fig 2) of each drive tooth is transverse (See fig 5) to the first keder and the first face of the door panel and the second face of the door panel (See 2, fig 5), and the fastener channel is positioned closer to a center portion of the door panel than the interior channel (See figs 2 and 5) (Examiner notes that it is clear via the disclosure that the applicant intends to claim "wherein the fastener is positioned closer to a center portion of the door panel than the first elongated body is to a center portion of the door panel;", and the limitation is interpreted as such.); and a second portion of the plurality of drive teeth (as at 2a, fig 5) are fixed to the second keder (as at 8, fig 4) such that the fastener channel (See at 14 in fig 2) of each drive tooth is transverse (See fig 5) to the second keder and the first face of the door panel and the second face of the door panel (See 2, fig 5), and the fastener channel is positioned closer to a center portion of the door panel than the interior channel (See figs 2 and 5) (Examiner notes that it is clear via the disclosure that the applicant intends to claim "wherein the fastener is positioned closer to a center portion of the door panel than the first elongated body is to a center portion of the door panel;", and the limitation is interpreted as such.). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art, with a reasonable expectation of success, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the panel of Jeon Byeong-Seok with the keder construction and fastener orientation of Iglesias Ballester. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to yield the predictable result of improving the centering of the panel within the opening of the door, and allowing for easier servicing or replacement of the drive teeth. Regarding claim 19. The combination of Jeon Byeong-Seok and Iglesias Ballester teaches all limitations of claim 18. The combination, in Iglesias Ballester, further teaches a plurality of fasteners (14, fig 2), wherein each drive tooth (2a, fig 2) from the plurality of drive teeth (See fig 2) is fastened to the first keder (8, fig 2) or the second keder with a different fastener from the plurality of fasteners (See fig 2), each fastener bridging the opening channel (Between the halves of 2a in fig 5) in the drive tooth the different fastener fastens to the first keder or the second keder (See fig 2). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-19 have been considered but are moot in light of the new ground of rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN W HANES JR whose telephone number is (571)272-8840. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Daniel Cahn can be reached at 571-270-5616. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.W.H./Examiner, Art Unit 3634 /DANIEL P CAHN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3634
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 04, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 25, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 04, 2024
Response Filed
Dec 27, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
Feb 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
May 05, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
May 14, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
May 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 27, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 23, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Feb 02, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 24, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594443
Safety System with Digital Tracking and Reporting and Method of Use
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590463
PRIVACY SHADE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12577832
A DOOR OPERATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571254
DOOR ASSEMBLY HAVING A SOFT BOTTOMED DOOR PANEL AND SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565807
RESISTANCE REGULATING DEVICE FOR ROPE-FREE CURTAIN
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
47%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+38.9%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 108 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month