Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/404,574

CORE REPAIR OF A CORE STRUCTURE PANEL USING A TRIPLY PERIODIC MINIMAL SURFACE STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 04, 2024
Examiner
AKAKPO, DANY E
Art Unit
3672
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
The Boeing Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
462 granted / 531 resolved
+35.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
565
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
67.2%
+27.2% vs TC avg
§102
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
§112
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 531 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 and 11-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Dayong et al. (CN110641083A). Regarding claims 1, 11, Dayong discloses A vehicle comprising a core structure panel comprising: a first laminate skin (1) (fig 1); a second laminate skin (3) (fig 1); a core (2,4, 5) between the first laminate skin and the second laminate skin (fig 1); and a triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) structure adhered to a portion of the core (page 3, fig 1). Regarding claim 2, Dayong further discloses that a foam adhesive adheres the TPMS structure to the portion (page 3, fig 1). Regarding claim 3, Dayong further discloses that a lattice of the TPMS structure is a sheet based TPMS (page 7). Regarding claim 12, Dayong further discloses that the TPMS structure comprises metal or a polymer material produced by an additive manufacturing machine (fig 1, page 3, product by process). Regarding claim 13, Dayong further discloses a foam adhesive adheres the TPMS structure to the portion (page 8). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4-7 and 14-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dayong et al. (CN110641083A) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Hundley et al. (US 11,148,375) Regarding claims 4-6 and 14-15, Dayong is silent regarding the fact that the TPMS structure is a component of a repair patch for a portion of the core structure panel with one or more inconsistencies. Hundley teaches a structure (200) that is a component of a repair patch (200) for a portion of the core structure panel (13) with one or more inconsistencies (figs 5a-e). (Claim 5) Hundley further teaches that the repair patch includes a ply of adhesive film coupled to the second laminate skin, the TPMS structure, a foam adhesive coupled to the TPMS structure, an adhesive film, a plurality of repair plies corresponding to the first laminate skin, one or more extra repair plies, a sanding ply, or combinations thereof (col 5 lines 47-61, figs 5a-e). (Claim 6) Hundley further teaches a filler ply to fill a gap between a surface of the structure and the first skin (figs 5a-e). Before the effective filling date, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of Dayong and Hundley before him or her, to modify the apparatus/method disclosed by Dayong to include a repair patch as taught by Hundley in order to help repair a damaged section of a core (abstract). Regarding claim 7, Dayong further discloses a first curing process is used to adhere the TPMS structure to the first laminate skin via the ply of adhesive film and to adhere the TPMS structure to the portion via the foam adhesive (page 8, fig 1). Claims 8-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dayong et al. (CN110641083A) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Muir (US 20170225428A1) Regarding claims 8-10, Dayong is silent regarding the fact that the TPMS structure has a density gradient. Muir teaches that the structure has a density gradient ([0050]-[0053]). (Claim 9) Muir further teaches that the structure has a first density near the first laminate skin, a second density near the second laminate skin, and wherein density decreases from the first density and the second density toward a center of the structure ([0050]-[0053]). (Claim 10) Muir further teaches that the structure has a first density near the first laminate skin, a second density near the second laminate skin that is less than the first density, and wherein density decreases from the first density to the second density across the structure ([0050]-[0053]). Before the effective filling date, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of Dayong and Muir before him or her, to modify the apparatus/method disclosed by Dayong to include a structure with a density gradient as taught by Muir in order to achieve different mechanical properties ([0050]). Claims 16 and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ondrejas et al. (US 4855182) and Dayong et al. (CN110641083A). Regarding claim 16, 19, Ondrejas discloses a method comprising: forming an opening (5) in a core structure panel (2) (figs 1-2, abstract), the opening extending through a first laminate skin (3) and at least partially through a core (2) of the core structure panel (fig 1); positioning a core plug (9) in the opening (fig 1), wherein the core plug comprises a structure (9) to replace the core removed during formation of the opening (figs 1-2,abstract); adhering the structure to the core adjacent to the opening (figs 1-2); and repairing the first laminate skin (figs 1-2, abstract). Ondrejas is silent regarding the fact that the core plug comprises triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) (abstract, page 5). Dayong teaches that the core plug comprises triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) (abstract, page 3). (Claim 19) Dayong further discloses curing a foam adhesive between the TPMS structure and the core (abstract, page 5). Before the effective filling date, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of Dayong and Ondrejas before him or her, to modify the apparatus/method disclosed by Ondrejas to include a core plug that comprises triply periodic minimal surface as taught by Dayong in order to improve the mechanical properties of the structure (abstract). Regarding claim 18, Ondrejas further discloses said forming the opening includes removing a portion of the core structure panel with one or more inconsistencies (figs 1-2, abstract). Regarding claim 20, Ondrejas further discloses repairing a portion of a second laminate skin with one or more inconsistencies (abstract, figs 1-2). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 17 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANY E AKAKPO whose telephone number is (469)295-9255. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicole Coy can be reached on (571) 272-5405. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANY E AKAKPO/Examiner, Art Unit 3672 01/26/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 04, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
May 11, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12623583
VEHICLE
2y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12623725
VEHICLE REAR STRUCTURE
2y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12617360
RETRACTABLE BUMPER ASSEMBLY WITH ACTUATOR BASED ON VEHICLE SPEED
2y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12617475
VEHICLE BODY REAR STRUCTURE
2y 8m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12618996
REAL-TIME CHARACTERIZATION OF FLUID FRONT IN SUBSURFACE FORMATION AND INFLOW MANAGEMENT
2y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.1%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 531 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month