Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/405,138

ADSORBENT RETENTION PLATE ASSEMBLY FOR AN EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS CANISTER

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 05, 2024
Examiner
JONES, CHRISTOPHER P
Art Unit
1776
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Phinia Jersey Holdings LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
1023 granted / 1346 resolved
+11.0% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
1385
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
41.6%
+1.6% vs TC avg
§102
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
§112
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1346 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6 and 10-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Turner EP 0512597 A1. Regarding claim 1, Turner discloses a retention plate (tray 24) assembly for an evaporative emissions canister (canister 10), the assembly comprising: a cover for closing an open end of the canister (cover 16), the cover having an inner surface (see figure 1); a retention plate having a first surface facing the cover and an opposite second surface facing away from cover, the first surface of the retention plate being spaced from the inner surface of the cover (see figure 1); a resilient member between the retention plate and the cover and engaged with the first surface of the retention plate and the inner surface of the cover (springs 26); a plurality of pins extending from the inner surface of the cover (pins 40); and a plurality of bosses extending from the first surface of the retention plate (36 and 38), the number of bosses equaling the number of pins such that each said boss complements one of the pins (see figure 2); the pins being aligned with and received in the bosses, wherein travel of the retention plate is guided by the pins and the pins and bosses cooperatively limit tilting of the retention plate (see figure 2). Regarding claim 2, Turner discloses that the bosses are evenly spaced about the first surface of the retention plate, and the pins are evenly spaced about the inner surface of the cover (see figure 1). Regarding claim 3, Turner discloses that each of the pins has a cross-shaped cross-section (see figure 4: pin 40). Regarding claim 4, Turner discloses that each of the pins has a terminal end distal from the inner surface of the cover, the terminal end including a stop (figure 4: top of pin 40 can be considered a stop). Regarding claim 5, Turner discloses that each boss includes a recess sized to receive one of the pins (see figures), each boss further including at least one inwardly curved, flexible finger (radiating fins 38) that is engageable with the stop, the at least one finger extending into the recess, and the stop limiting an amount of travel of the retention plate away from the cover (see figures). Regarding claim 6, Turner discloses that each boss is a generally tubular projection including a cylindrical recess (see figure 1: 36 and 38). Regarding claims 10-15, Turner discloses an evaporative emissions canister comprising: a casing defining an internal volume (figure 1: 12); a retention plate (tray 24) partitioning the internal volume into an adsorbent chamber (figure 1: 18) and a void space (figure 1: area below tray 24); an adsorbent that fills the adsorbent chamber (figure 1: adsorbent 18); a cover closing an opening in the casing, the cover being adjacent the void space and having an inner surface that faces the void space and the retention plate (figure 1: cover 16); the retention plate having a first surface facing the cover and a second surface facing the adsorbent chamber (see figure 1); a resilient member between the retention plate and the cover and engaged with the first surface of the retention plate and the inner surface of the cover (springs 26); a plurality of pins extending from the inner surface of the cover (pins 40); and a plurality of bosses extending from the first surface of the retention plate (36 and 38), the number of bosses equaling the number of pins such that each said boss complements one of the pins; the pins being aligned with and received in the bosses, wherein travel of the retention plate is guided by the pins and the pins and bosses cooperatively limit tilting of the retention plate (see figure 1), and urged engagement of the retention plate with the adsorbent in the adsorbent chamber maintains the packing of the adsorbent in the adsorbent chamber (see figure 1). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 7-9 and 16-18 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Turner EP 0512597 A1. Turner is relied upon as above. Regarding claims 7 and 16, Turner does not disclose four of said pins and a complementary four of said bosses. Nevertheless, absent a proper showing of criticality or unexpected results, the number of pins and complementary bosses is considered to be a general condition that would have been routinely optimized by one having ordinary skill in the art in order to provide optimal locking effectiveness (see Turner column 4, lines 2-33). MPEP 2144.05. Regarding claims 8 and 17, Turner discloses a quadrilateral shape (figure 4). In the case where Turner is modified to have four pins, one having ordinary skill in the art would optimize the locations of the pins, such that they are evenly spaced, as taught by Turner (see figures). Furthermore, it would have been obvious to located them at the four vertices of the quadrilateral shape, since it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art. MPEP 2144.04 (VI-C). Regarding claims 9 and 18, Turner does not disclose at least one metal bead on the first surface of the retention plate for detecting the position of the retention plate within the housing. Nevertheless, some type of visual indicator to help position or align a device is generally well-known in the art and would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the claimed invention. MPEP 2144.03 (A-E). Furthermore, utilizing a metal bead for this purpose would have been obvious since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER P JONES whose telephone number is (571)270-7383. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-6PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Dieterle can be reached at (571)270-7872. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER P JONES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1776
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 05, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599865
Sealing Interface, Air Dryer Cartridge and Air Treatment Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599869
GAS SEPARATION METHOD AND GAS SEPARATION APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594519
METHODS FOR REGENERATING A FILTER MEDIUM AND CLEANING FLUE GAS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589354
ACIDIC GAS SEPARATION DEVICE, AIR PURIFIER, AIR CONDITIONER, AND ACIDIC GAS CONCENTRATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590284
SYSTEM FOR THE CAPTURE AND PURIFICATION OF CO2 AND PURIFICATION UNIT OF SAID SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+24.8%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1346 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month