Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/405,563

COOKING APPLIANCE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 05, 2024
Priority
Aug 29, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0113318
Examiner
FAROKHROOZ, FATIMA N
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allowance Rate
413 granted / 851 resolved
-19.5% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+33.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
901
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
96.7%
+56.7% vs TC avg
§102
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§112
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 851 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office 5/29/26 has been entered. Claims 1-5 and 7-18 remain pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 3, 7-12,14 and 17-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Miranda (US 20230272917 A1, cited previously) in view of Sumihiro (JP 2019086282 A) Regarding claim 1, Miranda teaches a cooking appliance (oven in Abstract, at least Fig.1, 3 and 5) and comprising: a main body (under roof 104) having a cooking chamber defined therein; a door 120 ([0029]) disposed at a front side of the main body to open and close the cooking chamber; a camera 220 ([0049]) disposed inside the door to film the cooking chamber; and a lighting (216 and 218 in [0052]) disposed inside the door to illuminate an area filmed by the camera, wherein the lighting includes a first lighting (plurality of 216 on one side and 218 on the other side) and a second lighting 217/219 (217/219 between 216 and the camera) disposed on at least one of one side and another side in a lateral direction of the camera; and the second lighting 217/219 is disposed between the camera 220 and the first lighting 216. Further regarding the first direction of the first lighting: Miranda discloses: Plurality of light sources 216, 218 (that is first lighting) may be configured to illuminate internal cavity 136 or articles placed therein, therefore the light sources 216 and 218 are considered to face the chamber/cavity in order to light the internal cavity or its articles. Miranda already teaches plurality of lighting elements 216/218 (and also 217,219 adjacent/closest to the camera ) but does not teach: the first lighting and the second lighting irradiate light in different directions from each other, the second lighting irradiates light in a direction inclined toward the camera, However, it is well known technique in the art to use such second lighting element that particularly face the cameras and are disposed closest to and/or on either side adjacent to the cameras. Sumihiro discloses this feature in a chamber of a refrigerator that provides imaging: Sumihiro discloses: For example, as shown in FIG. 37, when imaging the inside of the storage 701 with the imaging camera 706 provided on one side (for example, the left side in FIG. 37) of the storage 701, the refrigerator 700 is The illumination LED 707 provided on the surface facing the imaging camera 706. PNG media_image1.png 277 214 media_image1.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, to make adjustable/different the orientation of the light from the first and second light sources, such that the second light sources face the camera and form the second lighting devices from the teachings of Sumihiro, as claimed, whereas the first lighting elements face the cavity/articles from the teachings of Miranda, thereby the first and second lighting elements illuminate in different directions, in order to illuminate the cavity using the first lighting elements and also facilitate improved imaging from the camera using the second lighting elements that face the camera. Regarding claim 2, Miranda in view of Sumihiro teaches a cooking appliance (see inclination of the bracket 256 in Fig.7, Fig.9 and [0049] in Miranda), wherein the first lighting is disposed at a location biased upward from a center in a vertical direction of the door, and irradiates light in a direction inclined downward ([0060], also see During use, forward surface 267 angle CV may allow camera and lighting to be directed toward articles placed within internal chamber 116 in [0061] in Miranda). Regarding claim 3, Miranda in view of Sumihiro teaches a cooking appliance, wherein the first lighting irradiates light in a direction toward a bottom surface of the cooking chamber ([0049], [0060] in Miranda) but does not explicitly teach: in a direction that is between a direction toward a rear surface of the cooking chamber and a direction toward a bottom surface of the cooking chamber. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, to make adjustable the orientation of the light from the light sources, by routine experimentation, in order to achieve the desired orientation. Regarding claim 7, Miranda in view of Sumihiro teaches the first and second lighting elements but does not explicitly teach the particular orientation of the second lighting irradiates light in a direction that is between a direction toward a rear surface of the cooking chamber and the lateral direction toward the camera. However, Miranda already teaches multiple light sources on both sides of the camera and it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, to use well known design techniques of camera related illumination, to use the orientation as claimed, by routine experimentation, in order to efficiently use the camera within the oven. Regarding claim 8, Miranda in view of Sumihiro teaches the cooking appliance, wherein the first lighting includes a pair of first lightings arranged in the lateral direction and the camera is disposed between the pair of first lightings, wherein the second lighting includes a pair of second lightings, and one of the pair of second lightings is disposed between the camera and one of the pair of first lightings and another of the pair of second lightings is disposed between the camera and another of the pair of first lightings (pairs of multiple lighting elements on two sides of the camera in Miranda, are considered as the pair of first and second lightings). Regarding claim 9, Miranda in view of Sumihiro teaches the cooking appliance, wherein the first lighting and the second lighting are disposed between an end in the lateral direction of the door and the camera, and are disposed at locations closer to the end in the lateral direction of the door than to the camera (from the arrangement of the lighting sources on the two sides of the camera). Regarding claim 10, Miranda in view of Sumihiro teaches the cooking appliance, wherein the second lighting includes a pair of second lightings arranged in the lateral direction of the door with the camera interposed therebetween, wherein the second lighting includes a pair of second lightings arranged in the lateral direction of the door with the camera interposed therebetween (pairs of multiple lighting elements on two sides of the camera in Miranda, are considered as the pair of first and second lightings and from the arrangement of the lighting sources on the two sides of the camera). Regarding claim 11, Miranda in view of Sumihiro teaches the cooking appliance, wherein the first lighting includes a pair of first lightings and the pair of first lightings are arranged in the lateral direction of the door with the camera and the pair of second lightings interposed between the pair of first lightings (pairs of multiple lighting elements on two sides of the camera in Miranda, are considered as the pair of first and second lightings and from the arrangement of the lighting sources on the two sides of the camera). Regarding claim 12, Miranda in view of Sumihiro teaches the cooking appliance, wherein the second lighting is disposed at a location closer to the first lighting than to the camera (second lighting 217/219 ([0051] and [0052] in Miranda) disposed between the camera 220 and the first lighting 216 (Fig.5)). Regarding claim 14, Miranda in view of Sumihiro teaches the cooking appliance, further comprising a supporter (208 in Fig.4-5 and [0049], [0048], [0047] in Miranda) supporting at least one of the first lighting and the second lighting and coupled to the door, wherein the first lighting and the second lighting includes a light source configured to irradiate light rearward toward the cooking chamber (see in Miranda: During use, forward surface 267 angle CV may allow camera and lighting to be directed toward articles placed within internal chamber 116. ; wherein the light source of at least one of the first lighting and the second lighting is coupled to the supporter (at least from Fig.4-5 in Miranda). Regarding claim 17, Miranda in view of Sumihiro teaches the cooking appliance, wherein the supporter includes: a first support 262 (in Miranda) supporting the light source disposed in the first lighting; a second support 260 supporting the light source disposed in the second lighting; a third support 258 supporting the camera ([0060]); and a supporter main body (248, [0047] in Miranda) supporting the first support, the second support, and the third support and coupled to the door. PNG media_image2.png 793 473 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 781 311 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 326 600 media_image4.png Greyscale Regarding claim 18, Miranda in view of Sumihiro teaches the cooking appliance, further comprising a supporter cover 204 and 206 ([0044], trim panels that partially support the supporter 208 in Miranda) covering the supporter 208 from a rear of the supporter and coupled to the supporter main body, wherein a receiving space 222 ([0062]) is defined between the supporter main body 208 and the supporter cover 204/206; but does not teach: at least a portion of a cable connected to the camera and the light source of the first lighting and the second lighting, the camera, and the light source of the first lighting and the second lighting are accommodated in the receiving space. However, throughout its disclosure (of Miranda) Miranda in view of Sumihiro discloses various ways of connecting the front cover in Fig.7 to the back cover of Fig.6 below, by various attaching ways, and with options of forming gaps and projections between the front and back covers ([0059]- [0060]; and [0054], [0059] in Miranda). PNG media_image5.png 519 697 media_image5.png Greyscale And it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, to use well known design techniques of hard wiring the camera, when needed, by placing wiring or cables behind the front cover and placing the wiring and cables in the space between the front and back covers, as shown by arrows below, in order to operate the electronic devices: PNG media_image6.png 694 699 media_image6.png Greyscale Claims 4,5 ,13 and 15-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Miranda in view of Sumihiro and further in view of Nakashima (US 20210095862 A1, cited previously) Regarding claim 4, Miranda in view of Sumihiro teaches a cooking appliance, wherein the first lighting includes a light source to irradiate light in a direction inclined downward ([0061], [0060] of Mirada and see rejection in claims 2 and 3 above) but does not teach a diffusion member covering the light source. However, it is well known in the art to use diffuser before the lighting device in cooking devices. Nakashima teaches this feature in at least [0006] and [0064], [0068] and it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, to use a diffuser in the path of light, from the teachings of Nakashima, in the device of Miranda in view of Sumihiro, in order to achieve the desired orientation or uniform illumination, by the diffused/scattered light ([0068] in Nakashima). Regarding claim 5, Miranda in view of Sumihiro and Nakashima, teaches the cooking appliance, wherein the diffusion member forms a plane perpendicular to the light irradiating direction of the light source ([0068] in Nakashima, also see rejection in claim 4 above). Regarding claim 13, Miranda in view of Sumihiro teaches the cooking appliance, wherein the second lighting includes a light source (second lighting 217/219 ([0051] and [0052]) disposed between the camera 220 and the first lighting 216 (Fig.5)). Miranda in view of Sumihiro further teaches (in Miranda): The camera may be angled toward an internal chamber of the appliance and may notably be able to achieve a more true-to-life color to the images produced by the camera (as compared to existing systems in Miranda) Additionally or alternatively, forward surface 267 (in Miranda) may be angled at a non-zero angle (e.g., angle CV in FIG. 9) relative to vertical direction V. During use, forward surface 267 angle CV may allow camera and lighting to be directed toward articles placed within internal chamber 116. Angle of forward surface 267 may be an acute angle. As shown, camera 220 is directed downward in vertical direction V and rearward in transverse direction T by the angle of forward surface 267. In the illustrated embodiments, camera 220 is flush or parallel to forward surface 267 During use, forward surface 267 (in Miranda) angle CV may allow camera and lighting to be directed toward articles placed within internal chamber 116. And that it is configured to irradiate light rearward toward the cooking chamber (see item 3. above), but does not teach a diffusion member forming a plane inclined toward the camera and covering the light source from a rear of the light source. However, it is well known in the art to use diffuser before the lighting device in cooking devices. Nakashima teaches this feature in at least [0006] and [0064],[0068] and it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, to use a diffusion member, from the teachings of Nakashima, by forming a plane inclined toward the camera and covering the light source from a rear of the light source, by routine experimentation, in the device of Miranda in view of Sumihiro, in order to achieve the desired orientation by the diffused/scattered light ([0068] in Nakashima). Regarding claim 15, Miranda in view of Sumihiro teaches the invention set forth in claim 14 above, but is silent regarding a diffusion member covering the light source disposed in the first lighting from a rear of the light source, wherein the diffusion member forms a plane perpendicular to a light irradiating direction of the light source of the first lighting. However, it is well known in the art to use diffuser before the lighting device in cooking devices. Nakashima teaches this feature in at least [0006] and [0064],[0068] and it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, to use a diffusion member, from the teachings of Nakashima, such that the diffusion member forms a plane perpendicular to a light irradiating direction of the light source of the first lighting, in the device of Miranda in view of Sumihiro, in order to achieve the desired orientation by the diffused/scattered light ([0068] in Nakashima). Regarding claim 16, Miranda in view of Sumihiro teaches the invention set forth in claim 14 above, but is silent regarding a diffusion member covering the light source of the at least one of the first lighting and the second lighting from a rear of the light source; and a supporter cover supporting the diffusion member and coupled to the supporter. However, using a diffusive member covering the lighting elements is a well known technique in order to scatter the light, and achieve uniform illumination. Miranda in view of Sumihiro (in Miranda) teaches the lighting elements in a bare position in Fig. 5, in which the light emitting elements are visible as shown below: PNG media_image7.png 121 345 media_image7.png Greyscale Or in another position wherein the individual elements are covered and are not visible as shown below: PNG media_image8.png 113 305 media_image8.png Greyscale A person of ordinary skill in the art would consider covering the individual lighting elements of the top Figure, with a diffusive cover, such that it appears as the bottom Figure. Furthermore, in the same field of endeavor, Nakashima teaches a diffuser 170 (Fig.14 and 13; [0064]). and it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, to use a diffuser in the path of light, from the teachings of Nakashima, in the device of Miranda in view of Sumihiro, such that supporter cover (260,262 in Fig.7) supporting the diffusion member and coupled to the supporter 208 (in Miranda) in order to achieve the desired orientation by the diffused/scattered light ([0068] in Nakashima). Other art Cited previously US 20160033194 A1-with camera 18 and image capturing light 19 US 20170234602 A1-with camera 162 and light emitter 164 CN 210197365 U-with camera 3 and light emitter 4 WO 2023007895 A1-with light source 66 adjacent camera 62 JP 2019143965 A-with camera 18 and imaging light 19 Response to Arguments The arguments filed by the Applicant on 4/30/26 is acknowledged however they are moot in light of new grounds of rejection. Sumihiro explicitly teaches lighting elements disposed adjacent cameras in an enclosed chamber, wherein these second lighting elements face the camera, whereas Miranda already discloses a plurality of lighting elements on both sides of the camera. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention, to make adjustable/different the orientation of the light from the first and second light sources, such that the second light sources face the camera and form the second lighting devices from the teachings of Sumihiro, as claimed, whereas the first lighting elements face the cavity/articles from the teachings of Miranda, thereby the first and second lighting elements illuminate in different directions, in order to illuminate the cavity using the first lighting elements and also facilitate improved imaging from the camera using the second lighting elements that face the camera. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Fatima Farokhrooz whose telephone number is (571)-272-6043. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday- Friday, 9 am - 5 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the Examiner’s Supervisor, James Greece can be reached on (571) 272-3711. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Fatima N Farokhrooz/ Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 05, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 15, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 29, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 01, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681230
LIGHT GUIDE MEMBER FOR LIGHT EMISSION DEVICE AND LIGHT EMISSION DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681225
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677710
ALL-INORGANIC UP-CONVERSION DISPLAY
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12655952
Flush Glass Adjustable Lighting Fixture
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12627118
IGNITION SYSTEM AND IGNITER HAVING RUTHENIUM GROUND ELECTRODE AND PLATINUM-IRIDIUM ALLOY CENTER ELECTRODE
2y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+33.3%)
2y 11m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 851 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month