Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/405,756

VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 05, 2024
Examiner
MCFALL, NICHOLAS A
Art Unit
3644
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Polaris Industries Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
449 granted / 524 resolved
+33.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
541
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
35.0%
-5.0% vs TC avg
§102
32.2%
-7.8% vs TC avg
§112
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 524 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1) and (a2) as being anticipated by Castillo et al. (hereinafter Castillo, US Publication Number 20180148103). Regarding claim 1, Castillo discloses a chassis for a side-by-side utility vehicle (Figure 3), the chassis comprising: a front chassis section comprising: a primary tubular assembly defining an upper quadrilateral and a front quadrilateral; and a reinforcing tubular assembly fixed to the primary tubular assembly, the reinforcing tubular assembly having cross braces defining an upper triangle and a lower triangle with a junction therebetween; a rear chassis section; a left chassis section positioned longitudinally between the front chassis section and the rear chassis section; and a right chassis section positioned longitudinally between the front chassis section and the rear chassis section and laterally spaced from the left chassis section (Figure 3, Paragraph 14). Please see the reproduction of Figure 3 below for detailed callouts. PNG media_image1.png 897 1280 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, see figure 3. Regarding claim 10, see figure 3. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 14-22 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art of record fails to show alone or in combination the features of a chassis as claimed comprising a front and rear chassis sections as claimed wherein the sections of comprised of front or rear tubes respectively that are welded to one another and a front or rear weldment that formed by a sheet metal components welded to one another as claimed and left and right chassis sections as claimed. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Claims 3-9 and 11-13 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. USPN 20180215415, 12117048 and 11293467 disclose tubular chassis assemblies. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NICHOLAS A MCFALL whose telephone number is (571)270-5769. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7-4. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Collins can be reached at (571)272-6886. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Nicholas McFall/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3644
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 05, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599238
NECK SUPPORTING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600503
Modular, configurable airframe system for heavy lift rotary wing UAV
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595055
Payload Delivery Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589708
FRONT END MODULE FRAME OF VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589870
THE METHOD OF OBTAINING LIFT AND THRUST FOR HORIZONTAL FLIGHT OF VERTICAL TAKE-OFF AND LANDING FLYING MACHINE WHILE MAINTAINING THE HORIZONTAL STABILITY OF THE MACHINE'S FLIGHT AND THE MACHINE TO IMPLEMENT THIS METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+11.7%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 524 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month