Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/405,828

LOAD SENSOR

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 05, 2024
Priority
Jul 09, 2021 — JP 2021-114004 +1 more
Examiner
DEVITO, ALEX T
Art Unit
2855
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
550 granted / 762 resolved
+4.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
784
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
85.1%
+45.1% vs TC avg
§102
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§112
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 762 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The claims are replete with various method steps. The applicant should either re-write the claims in terms structure and function, or may wish to draft method claims. Claim 1, lines 9-11 recites “a width… is changed”. It is unclear if the claim scope includes the cutouts 12a in fig 1a which gives the electrically conductive elastic body a non-constant width or the process of making the cutouts. Claim 2, lines 7 and 8 recite “the width… is adjusted”. Claim 4, line 2, recites “the width is changed due to omission of a part”. Claim 5, line 2, recites “the width is changed due to provision of a cutout”. Claim 6, line 2, recites “the width is changed due to provision of an opening”. Each of claim 2, 4, 5 and 6 are unclear if the scope of those claims covers the structure of the process to make the structure. Claims 7, 8 and 9 recite “a shape change” or “the shape change”. A “shape change” is not a physical object. From the specification and drawings, it appears the cutouts are a change in shape as compared to a prior invention that electrically conductive elastic bodies with a constant width. Allowable Subject Matter The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: To expedite prosecution, the examiner searched with respect to the invention seen in figure 1a. No prior art load sensor has cutouts giving a non-constant width to the electrically conductive elastic body such that “a relationship between a load and a contact area between the electrically-conductive elastic body and the electrically-conductive member via the dielectric body becomes close to a linear relationship.” Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEX T DEVITO whose telephone number is (571)270-7551. The examiner can normally be reached 12pm- 8 pm EST M-S. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John Breene can be reached at 571-272-4107. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEX T DEVITO/Examiner, Art Unit 2855 /JOHN E BREENE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2855
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 05, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12631446
LANE EDGE DETECTION IN AN ELECTRODE SHEET OF A BATTERY
2y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12622599
SAMPLE COLLECTION METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR VIRAL LOAD LEVEL DIAGNOSIS
3y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12618739
TEST LEAKAGE DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12618817
COMPACT DEHYDRATION AND TRAP MODULE
2y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12613232
GAS SENSOR SYSTEM
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+11.9%)
3y 1m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 762 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month