Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/406,190

SHEET FOR ELECTRODE AND ALL-SOLID STATE SECONDARY BATTERY, AND MANUFACTURING METHODS FOR SHEET FOR ELECTRODE, ELECTRODE SHEET, AND ALL-SOLID STATE SECONDARY BATTERY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 07, 2024
Priority
Sep 29, 2021 — JP 2021-159110 +1 more
Examiner
DOMONE, CHRISTOPHER P
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
508 granted / 605 resolved
+24.0% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
614
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
53.6%
+13.6% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
13.9%
-26.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 605 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ose et al. (PGPub 2018/0301747). Considering Claim 1, Ose discloses a sheet for an electrode (layer of raw material for anode mixture [0080]), comprising: an active material layer precursor layer (layer of raw material for anode mixture [0080] containing anode active material [Abstract]) containing an inorganic solid electrolyte (raw material anode mixture contains solid electrolyte [Abstract] that’s inorganic [0037]) having ion conductivity of a metal belonging to Group 1 or Group 2 in the periodic table (solid electrolyte material has Li ion conductivity [0036]), an active material (a would node active material [Abstract]), and a polymer binder (polymer binders [0045]), wherein the active material layer precursor layer is such that a content of the polymer binder is 3% by mass or less (volume of binder may be 0.3 volume % or more and 4.0 volume% or less so that the active material is maximized for a high energy density [0047], so choosing within this range and coming up with a proportional polymer range of 3% by mass or less to achieve such predicted results would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art) and a filling rate of 35% to 50% (claimed invention defines filling rate as film density / true density [0019], voidage of 100 – (D1 absolute density / D0 true density) x 100 is 43% or more and 54% or less (for a filling rate of 46% - 57%) [0014], or 45% to 52% (for a filling rate of 48% to 55%) [0058], with example values of 52, 53, 54 in Examples 2, 3, and 4 (for a filling rate of 48, 47, 46%) [Table 1]). Considering Claim 2, Ose discloses that the anode is deposited to a uniform thickness [0080], and may be about 0.1 µm to about 10 mm [0085], and because energy density is optimized [0047], selecting within this range and coming up with a range of 150 µm to 10 mm to achieve such predicted results would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art. Considering Claim 3, Ose discloses that the inorganic solid electrolyte is a sulfide-based electrolyte (sulfide-based solid electrolyte [0036, 0037]). Considering Claim 4, Ose discloses that the inorganic solid electrolyte has a particle diameter of 0.1 to 2.5 µm (solid electrolyte particles are 1.0 µm [0097]). Considering Claim 5, Ose discloses that the active material precursor layer is a positive electrode active material precursor layer (cathode contains raw materials of binder, active material, and solid electrolyte [0063] and made in same way as the anode [0071], so optimizing the same voidage for the purpose of maintaining the ion conducting path and the electron conducting path with balance [0058] would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art) having a film density of 1.4 to 2.0 g/cm3 (made in same way as the anode [0071], absolute density is calculated [0055, 0169, 0174] and because mixture is optimized for a high energy density [0046, 0047] and containing the same lithium metal oxide [0065] and PVDF binder [0110], routinely experimenting with and coming up with an absolute film density of 1.4 to 2.0 g/cm3 would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art. Considering Claim 6, Ose discloses that the active material precursor layer is a negative electrode active material precursor layer (raw anode material layer [Abstract, 0080]) having a film density of 0.8 to 1.0 g/cm3 (absolute density of anode mixture layer is calculated [0055, 0169, 0174], and because mixture is optimized for a high energy density [0046, 0047] and containing the same silicon and PVDF [0009, 0045, 0102], routinely experimenting with and coming up with an absolute film density of 0.8 to 1.0 g/cm3 would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art). Considering Claim 7, Ose discloses a manufacturing method for a sheet for an electrode (method of producing raw anode material mixture [Abstract]), which is a method of manufacturing the sheet for an electrode according to claim 1 (see claim 1), in which an electrode composition containing an inorganic solid electrolyte (raw material anode mixture contains solid electrolyte [Abstract] that’s inorganic [0037]) having ion conductivity of a metal belonging to Group 1 or Group 2 (solid electrolyte material has Li ion conductivity [0036]), an active material (anode active material [Abstract]), a polymer binder (polymer binders [0045]), and a dispersion medium (butyl butyrate solution added and mixed [0102, 0098, 0104]) is applied onto a base material and dried (applied onto copper foil anode current collector and dried [0105]) to form an active material precursor layer (forms dried anode mixture layer [0105, [0080], which comes before the electricity passing step that changes the mixtures into the final respective parts [0007]), the manufacturing method comprising: a step of setting a content of solid contents of the polymer binder to 3% by mass or less to prepare the electrode composition (volume of binder is set to be 0.3 volume % or more and 4.0 volume% or less so that the active material is maximized for a high energy density [0047], so choosing within this range and coming up with a proportional polymer range of 3% by mass or less to achieve such predicted results would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art); and a step of setting a filling rate of the active material layer precursor layer to 35% to 50% (claimed invention defines filling rate as film density / true density [0019], voidage of 100 – (D1 absolute density / D0 true density) x 100 is set to be 43% or more and 54% or less (for a filling rate of 46% - 57%) [0014], or 45% to 52% (for a filling rate of 48% to 55%) [0058], with example values of 52, 53, 54 in Examples 2, 3, and 4 (for a filling rate of 48, 47, 46%) [Table 1]). Considering Claim 8, Ose discloses a manufacturing method for an electrode sheet, which is a manufacturing method for an electrode sheet having an active material layer on a base layer (method of producing raw anode material mixture [Abstract], applied onto copper foil anode current collector and dried [0105]), the manufacturing method comprising: pressing an active material layer precursor layer of a sheet for an electrode obtained by the manufacturing method for a sheet for an electrode according to claim 7, to form an active material layer (precursor layer pressed in later step to form anode layer [0131-0134] to form battery member [0135], see claim 7). Considering Claim 9, Ose discloses a manufacturing method for an all-soid state secondary battery, which is a manufacturing method for an all-solid state secondary battery (manufacturing method for obtaining all-solid-state lithium ion secondary battery [0135]) including a positive electrode active material layer, a solid electrolyte layer, and a negative electrode active material layer in this order (solid electrolyte layer disposed between anode layer and cathode layer [0083, Figure 1]), the manufacturing method comprising: pressing and forming at least one of the positive electrode active material layer or the negative electrode active material layer in a state where a sheet for an electrode obtained by the manufacturing method for a sheet for an electrode according to claim 7 is superposed with a solid electrolyte layer or a solid electrolyte layer forming material (cathode, solid electrolyte, and anode are all pressed [0131-0134], see claim 7). Considering Claim 10, Ose discloses an all-solid state secondary battery (all-solid-state lithium ion secondary battery [0135] manufactured by the manufacturing method for an all-solid state secondary battery according to claim 9 (see claim 9). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER P DOMONE whose telephone number is (571)270-7582. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-4:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Basia Ridley can be reached at (571)272-1453. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER P DOMONE/Primary Patent Examiner Art Unit 1725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 07, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700614
A SOLID-STATE ELECTROLYTE FOR SOLID-STATE RECHARGEABLE SODIUM-IONS BATTERIES
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12689092
BATTERY MODULE AND BATTERY PACK INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12683238
Battery Pack Case and Battery Pack Including the Same
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683177
FUEL CELL SYSTEM
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676336
BATTERY CELL AND APPARATUS FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+20.8%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 605 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month