Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/406,241

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RANDOM ACCESS IN REPETITION MODE IN WIRELESS MOBILE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 08, 2024
Priority
Nov 16, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0157850 +1 more
Examiner
KIM, CHONG G
Art Unit
2443
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Soenghun KIM
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
375 granted / 451 resolved
+25.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
478
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
§103
44.4%
+4.4% vs TC avg
§102
41.3%
+1.3% vs TC avg
§112
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 451 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The office action is non-final due to a new ground of rejection in response to Applicant’s arguments filed on 4/8/2026. Response to Amendment The Amendment filed on 4/8/2026 has been entered. Claims 1-20 remain pending in the application. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments on pages 8-11 with respect to claims 1 and 18-20 have been considered but are moot upon a further consideration and a new ground of rejection made under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Fakoorian (US PGPub 2026/0164463). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Fakoorian (US PGPub 2026/0164463). Regarding claims 1 and 18-20, Fakoorian teaches a method performed by a wireless device (Fakoorian, see abstract, Systems, methods, and apparatus for a UE to demand message 3 (Msg3) repetition during a contention-based random access (CBRA) procedure are disclosed), the method comprising: receiving, from a base station, a system information block 1 (SIB1), wherein the SIB1 comprises one or more first threshold values (Fakoorian, see paragraphs 0024 and 0035, the RAN 104 (and, more particularly, the base station 106 and/or other base stations of the RAN 104) may transmit (e.g., broadcast) information that is usable by any number of UEs to perform a random access procedure. The information may include … system information. The additional RSRP threshold is referred to as rsrp-ThresholdSSB-SUL); and performing a first type random access or a second type random access based on a first threshold value of the one or more first threshold values (Fakoorian, see paragraph 0036, the UE may select a SUL carrier for performing a CBRA procedure when T<T2. Otherwise, the UE may select a NUL carrier for performing a CBRA procedure when T>T2), wherein in the first type random access: a first transmission of a Msg3 is performed based on a random access response (RAR); and one or more retransmissions of the Msg3 follow based on the RAR (Fakoorian, see paragraph 0048, the value targeted to assist the UE in determining whether to demand Msg3 repetition (received at 502) may include a third RSRP threshold (T3). In these embodiments, the third RSRP threshold may assist the UE in determining whether to demand Msg3 repetition on a NUL carrier), wherein in the second type random access: a first transmission of the Msg3 is performed based on the RAR; and retransmission of the Msg3 based on the RAR does not follow (Fakoorian, see paragraph 0049, the value targeted to assist the UE in determining whether to demand Msg3 repetition (received at 502) may include a third RSRP threshold (T3). In these embodiments, the third RSRP threshold may assist the UE in determining whether to demand Msg3 repetition … on a SUL carrier), wherein transmission power of a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) for the Msg3 is determined based on a power offset (Fakoorian, see paragraph 0056, If the UE then determines (at 606) that the Msg3 size is greater than ra-Msg3sizeGroupA and the downlink pathloss is less than PCMAX-T.sub.L1-msg3-DeltaPreamble-messagePowerOffsetGroupB, the UE may select (at 608) a RACH preamble from the second group of RACH preambles (e.g., the Group B RACH preambles)), wherein the power offset is an offset between the Msg3 transmission and a preamble transmission (Fakoorian, see paragraph 0056, msg3-DeltaPreamble is the power offset), wherein the power offset is determined based on a power offset parameter of a first container in case that: the first type random access is performed; and the power offset parameter of the first container is present in the first container (Fakoorian, see paragraph 0056, If the UE then determines (at 606) that the Msg3 size is greater than ra-Msg3sizeGroupA and the downlink pathloss is less than PCMAX-T.sub.L1-msg3-DeltaPreamble-messagePowerOffsetGroupB, the UE may select (at 608) a RACH preamble from the second group of RACH preambles (e.g., the Group B RACH preambles). Otherwise, if the UE determines (at 610) that the downlink pathloss is less than PCMAX-T.sub.N1-msg3-DeltaPreamble-messagePowerOffsetGroupB, the UE may select (at 612) a RACH preamble from a first subset of RACH preambles within the first group of RACH preambles, which RACH preambles are associated with a demand for Msg3 repetition), and wherein the power offset is determined based on a power offset parameter of a second container in case that: the second type random access is performed; and the power offset parameter of the second container is present in the second container (Fakoorian, see paragraph 0056, If the UE then determines (at 606) that the Msg3 size is greater than ra-Msg3sizeGroupA and the downlink pathloss is less than PCMAX-T.sub.L1-msg3-DeltaPreamble-messagePowerOffsetGroupB, the UE may select (at 608) a RACH preamble from the second group of RACH preambles (e.g., the Group B RACH preambles). Otherwise, if the UE determines (at 610) that the downlink pathloss is less than PCMAX-T.sub.N1-msg3-DeltaPreamble-messagePowerOffsetGroupB, the UE may select (at 614) a RACH preamble from a second subset of RACH preambles (e.g., the Group A RACH preambles) within the first group of RACH preambles, which RACH preambles are not associated with a demand for Msg3 repetition). Regarding claim 2, Fakoorian teaches wherein: the first container comprises one or more parameters for the first type random access (Fakoorian, see paragraph 0056, If the UE then determines (at 606) that the Msg3 size is greater than ra-Msg3sizeGroupA and the downlink pathloss is less than PCMAX-T.sub.L1-msg3-DeltaPreamble-messagePowerOffsetGroupB, the UE may select (at 608) a RACH preamble from the second group of RACH preambles (e.g., the Group B RACH preambles)); and the second container comprises one or more parameters for the second type random access (Fakoorian, see paragraph 0056, if the UE determines (at 610) that the downlink pathloss is less than PCMAX-T.sub.N1-msg3-DeltaPreamble-messagePowerOffsetGroupB, the UE may select (at 614) a RACH preamble from a second subset of RACH preambles (e.g., the Group A RACH preambles) within the first group of RACH preambles). Regarding claim 3, Fakoorian teaches wherein the first container and the second container are included in the SIB1 (Fakoorian, see paragraphs 0024 and 0035, the RAN 104 (and, more particularly, the base station 106 and/or other base stations of the RAN 104) may transmit (e.g., broadcast) information that is usable by any number of UEs to perform a random access procedure. The information may include … system information. The additional RSRP threshold is referred to as rsrp-ThresholdSSB-SUL). Regarding claim 4, Fakoorian teaches wherein the power offset is determined based on the power offset parameter of the second container in case that: the first type random access is performed; and the power offset parameter of the first container is absent in the first container (Fakoorian, see paragraph 0056, If the UE then determines (at 606) that the Msg3 size is greater than ra-Msg3sizeGroupA and the downlink pathloss is less than PCMAX-T.sub.L1-msg3-DeltaPreamble-messagePowerOffsetGroupB, the UE may select (at 608) a RACH preamble from the second group of RACH preambles (e.g., the Group B RACH preambles). Otherwise, if the UE determines (at 610) that the downlink pathloss is less than PCMAX-T.sub.N1-msg3-DeltaPreamble-messagePowerOffsetGroupB, the UE may select (at 612) a RACH preamble from a first subset of RACH preambles within the first group of RACH preambles, which RACH preambles are associated with a demand for Msg3 repetition). Regarding claim 5, Fakoorian teaches wherein the power offset is determined based on a specific predefined value in case that: the first type random access is performed; the power offset parameter of the first container is absent in the first container (Fakoorian, see paragraph 0056, If the UE then determines (at 606) that the Msg3 size is greater than ra-Msg3sizeGroupA and the downlink pathloss is less than PCMAX-T.sub.L1-msg3-DeltaPreamble-messagePowerOffsetGroupB, the UE may select (at 608) a RACH preamble from the second group of RACH preambles (e.g., the Group B RACH preambles). Otherwise, if the UE determines (at 610) that the downlink pathloss is less than PCMAX-T.sub.N1-msg3-DeltaPreamble-messagePowerOffsetGroupB, the UE may select (at 612) a RACH preamble from a first subset of RACH preambles within the first group of RACH preambles, which RACH preambles are associated with a demand for Msg3 repetition); and the power offset parameter of the second container is absent in the second container (Fakoorian, see paragraph 0056, If the UE then determines (at 606) that the Msg3 size is greater than ra-Msg3sizeGroupA and the downlink pathloss is less than PCMAX-T.sub.L1-msg3-DeltaPreamble-messagePowerOffsetGroupB, the UE may select (at 608) a RACH preamble from the second group of RACH preambles (e.g., the Group B RACH preambles). Otherwise, if the UE determines (at 610) that the downlink pathloss is less than PCMAX-T.sub.N1-msg3-DeltaPreamble-messagePowerOffsetGroupB, the UE may select (at 614) a RACH preamble from a second subset of RACH preambles (e.g., the Group A RACH preambles) within the first group of RACH preambles, which RACH preambles are not associated with a demand for Msg3 repetition). Regarding claim 6, Fakoorian teaches wherein the first type random access is performed in case that a reference signal received power (RSRP) of a synchronization signal block (SSB) is less than the first threshold value (Fakoorian, see paragraphs 0024 and 0035, the RAN 104 (and, more particularly, the base station 106 and/or other base stations of the RAN 104) may transmit (e.g., broadcast) information that is usable by any number of UEs to perform a random access procedure. The information may include … system information. The additional RSRP threshold is referred to as rsrp-ThresholdSSB-SUL). Regarding claim 7, Fakoorian teaches wherein the second type random access is performed in case that a reference signal received power (RSRP) of a synchronization signal block (SSB) is greater than or equal to the first threshold value (Fakoorian, see paragraphs 0024 and 0035, the RAN 104 (and, more particularly, the base station 106 and/or other base stations of the RAN 104) may transmit (e.g., broadcast) information that is usable by any number of UEs to perform a random access procedure. The information may include … system information. The additional RSRP threshold is referred to as rsrp-ThresholdSSB-SUL). Regarding claim 8, Fakoorian teaches wherein a preamble is transmitted in a physical random access channel (PRACH) occasion that is determined based on a PRACH configuration index of the first container in case that the first type random access is performed (Fakoorian, see paragraph 0033, the UE may select a PRACH resource (e.g., a RACH preamble and RO) associated with the selected SSB, and continue performing a CBRA procedure). Regarding claim 9, Fakoorian teaches wherein a preamble is transmitted in a physical random access channel (PRACH) occasion that is determined based on a PRACH configuration index of the second container in case that the second type random access is performed (Fakoorian, see paragraph 0033, the UE may select a PRACH resource (e.g., a RACH preamble and RO) associated with the selected SSB, and continue performing a CBRA procedure). Regarding claim 10, Fakoorian teaches wherein a preamble is transmitted with transmission power determined based on a target power level parameter of the first container in case that the first type random access is performed (Fakoorian, see paragraph 0055, the method 500 may further include receiving, from the RAN (e.g., from a base station), a first value (T.sub.L1) of a target power for receiving the RACH preamble at the RAN (e.g., preambleReceivedTargetPower); and the value targeted to assist the UE in determining whether to demand Msg3 repetition (received at 502) may include a second value (T.sub.N1) of a target power for receiving the RACH preamble at the RAN. In practice, T.sub.N1<T.sub.L1). Regarding claim 11, Fakoorian teaches wherein a preamble is transmitted with transmission power determined based on a target power level parameter of the second container in case that the second type random access is performed (Fakoorian, see paragraph 0055, the method 500 may further include receiving, from the RAN (e.g., from a base station), a first value (T.sub.L1) of a target power for receiving the RACH preamble at the RAN (e.g., preambleReceivedTargetPower); and the value targeted to assist the UE in determining whether to demand Msg3 repetition (received at 502) may include a second value (T.sub.N1) of a target power for receiving the RACH preamble at the RAN. In practice, T.sub.N1<T.sub.L1). Regarding claim 12, Fakoorian teaches wherein the RAR is received based on a parameter indicating a length of a time interval of the first container in case that the first type random access is performed (Fakoorian, see paragraph 0055, the method 500 may further include receiving, from the RAN (e.g., from a base station), a first value (T.sub.L1) of a target power for receiving the RACH preamble at the RAN (e.g., preambleReceivedTargetPower); and the value targeted to assist the UE in determining whether to demand Msg3 repetition (received at 502) may include a second value (T.sub.N1) of a target power for receiving the RACH preamble at the RAN. In practice, T.sub.N1<T.sub.L1). Regarding claim 13, Fakoorian teaches wherein a number of the retransmission of the Msg3 is determined based on a specific field of an uplink grant in a specific RAR (Fakoorian, see paragraph 0048, the value targeted to assist the UE in determining whether to demand Msg3 repetition (received at 502) may include a third RSRP threshold (T3). In these embodiments, the third RSRP threshold may assist the UE in determining whether to demand Msg3 repetition on a NUL carrier). Regarding claim 14, Fakoorian teaches wherein: the specific field comprises an integer; and the integer is associated with a repetition number out of n repetition numbers (Fakoorian, see paragraph 0048, the value targeted to assist the UE in determining whether to demand Msg3 repetition (received at 502) may include a third RSRP threshold (T3). In these embodiments, the third RSRP threshold may assist the UE in determining whether to demand Msg3 repetition on a NUL carrier). Regarding claim 15, Fakoorian teaches wherein an association between integers and the n repetition numbers is provided in the SIB1 (Fakoorian, see paragraphs 0024 and 0035, the RAN 104 (and, more particularly, the base station 106 and/or other base stations of the RAN 104) may transmit (e.g., broadcast) information that is usable by any number of UEs to perform a random access procedure. The information may include … system information. The additional RSRP threshold is referred to as rsrp-ThresholdSSB-SUL). Regarding claim 16, Fakoorian teaches wherein the specific RAR comprises a random access preamble identifier corresponding to a transmitted preamble (Fakoorian, see paragraphs 0024 and 0035, the RAN 104 (and, more particularly, the base station 106 and/or other base stations of the RAN 104) may transmit (e.g., broadcast) information that is usable by any number of UEs to perform a random access procedure. The information may include … system information. The additional RSRP threshold is referred to as rsrp-ThresholdSSB-SUL). Regarding claim 17, Fakoorian teaches wherein: the first threshold value is determined based on a parameter for a normal uplink in case that random access is to be performed in the normal uplink (Fakoorian, see paragraph 0036, the UE may select a SUL carrier for performing a CBRA procedure when T<T2. Otherwise, the UE may select a NUL carrier for performing a CBRA procedure when T>T2); and the first threshold value is determined based on a parameter for a supplementary uplink in case that random access is to be performed in the supplementary uplink (Fakoorian, see paragraph 0036, the UE may select a SUL carrier for performing a CBRA procedure when T<T2. Otherwise, the UE may select a NUL carrier for performing a CBRA procedure when T>T2). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHONG G KIM whose telephone number is (571)270-0619. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri @ 9am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicholas R. Taylor can be reached at 571-272-3889. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHONG G KIM/Examiner, Art Unit 2443 /NICHOLAS R TAYLOR/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2443
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 08, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 08, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750914
COMMUNICATION METHOD OF COMMUNICATION TERMINAL AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR COMMUNICATING SERVICE DATA OF AN APPLICATION
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745124
Asset Management and IOT Device for Refrigerated Appliances
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745064
DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744791
PRE-FLOW GROUPING OF PACKETS FOR OPTIMZED DEEP PACKET INSPECTION
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739701
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICY IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+3.5%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 451 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month