Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/406,715

LUGGAGE COVER

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Jan 08, 2024
Priority
Jan 06, 2023 — provisional 63/437,422
Examiner
WEAVER, SUE A
Art Unit
3733
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
None recorded (individual inventor: Martin Chavez)
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
820 granted / 1323 resolved
-8.0% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
1334
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
48.2%
+8.2% vs TC avg
§102
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
§112
37.4%
-2.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1323 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 5-7 of the amendment, filed 4/16/20261-20, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s)1-20 under35 USC 112 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view od Yu (US 2017/0215537 A1) in view of Schinasi (US 2015/027289 A1}. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims Claim5 and 10-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 10 recites the limitation "the main opening" in line 15. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 5 and 16 recite wherein “the second fastener apparatus is an expandable zipper” in the last line of each claim. Each claim previously recites “ at iast one second fastening apparatus” It isn’t clear to which of the at least one second fastening apparatus “The second fastening apparatus” is being referred to. The claims should read “wherein the at least one second fastening apparatus is an expandable zipper.” Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) s 1,2 and 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yu (US 2017/021557 A1) in view of Schinasi (2015/0272289 A1). Yu teaches a cover for a luggage container(luggage cover #10), the cover comprises a body formed of a flexible durable material( formed of any durable material such as canvas, fabric, polyester, spandex, nylon, leather, plastic (e.g. vinyl), and the like) and configured to fully enclose the luggage container (panels surround all sides of the luggage), the body comprising a main opening (aperture #60) that is openable to permit access to the interior of the body, the main opening comprising a fastening apparatus (open and closed by a zipper mechanism), a first set of openings o a bottom side of the cover configured to permit passage of the luggage wheels when position within the body (wheels exposed through holes in the bottom panel #92)(para 0038) and a second set of closeable openings on a first, second or top side of the cover or any combination thereof, configured to permit passage of handles of the luggage container when positioned inside the body (aperture #40 or 50 may be used to expose a external component of the luggage container within the luggage cover `such as a handle or carrying means); and one or more handles (shoulder straps #20) on an exterior of the body positioned on the firs side, the second side, the top side, or any combination there of, wherein the cover provides a secure interior configured as a travel case when each of the main opening, the first set of closeable openings, and the second set of closeable openings are closed. Yu does not disclose closeable openings for the wheels. Schinasi discloses an analogous travel bag compfising a base (#1) having wheel holes (#9) and two flaps (#7) for opening and closing the w wheel holes. When opened the flaps allow a plate (#12) with wheels (#10) to be inserted through the holes, and when closed the flaps cover the wheel holes to prevent contents escaping from the bag. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date to modify the bottom of Yu to include closeable wheel apertures as taught by Schinasi in order to enable the cover to accept either wheeled or non-wheeled luggage while providing maximum protection. Regarding claims 2 and 10, note aperture (#50). Regarding claim 19, note aperture (#40). Allowable Subject Matter ClaimS 3.4 and 6-9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion ); Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SUE A WEAVER whose telephone number is (571)272-4548. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 6-10:30 AM EDT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Jenness, Ph.D.,can be reached at 571-270-5055. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SUE A WEAVER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3733
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 08, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Apr 16, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12667173
KIND OF CARD STORAGE BOX WITH SLIDE BAR STRUCTURE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12648629
Cut-Proof Anti-Theft Bag Construction
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12616883
GOLF BAGS, GOLF BAG TOPS AND METHODS TO MANUFACTURE GOLF BAGS AND GOLF BAG TOPS
2y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12599209
CARD FIXATION ASSEMBLY FOR CARD HOLDER AND CARD HOLDER
2y 8m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12551412
BABY BOTTLE WITH SYRINGE RECEIVER
1y 8m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+28.0%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1323 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month