DETAILED ACTION
(1)
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant’s amendment filed December 10, 2025, is entered. Applicant amended claims 1, 3, 12 and 14 and cancelled claims 2 and 13. No new matter is entered. Claims 1, 3-12 and 14-20 are pending before the Office for review.
(2)
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action.
Claims 1, 4 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2021/0175450), which is cited in Applicant’s information disclosure statement, in view of Haase (WO 2012/173959 A2).
With respect to claim 1, Kim teaches a solar cell (100) comprising a thin-film solar cell (120) and a bottom cell (110) stacked in a first direction, wherein the bottom cell includes a transparent conductive layer (114), a first doped conductive layer (112-2), an intrinsic amorphous silicon layer (112-1), a substrate (111) and a second doped conductive layer (113-2) that are stacked in the first direction. Figure 2 and Paragraphs 52, 56, 64, 74-80, 169 and 170. The transparent conductive layer is between the thin-film solar cell and the first doped conductive layer. Figure 2. The first doped conductive layer includes a doped amorphous silicon layer. Paragraphs 74-80.
Kim further teaches the surface of the substrate facing the intrinsic amorphous silicon layer has a plurality of textured structures, a surface of the intrinsic amorphous silicon layer away from the substrate has a plurality of textured structures respectively corresponding to the plurality of textured structures on the surface of the substrate, a surface of the first doped conductive layer away from the substrate has a plurality of textured structures respectively corresponding to the plurality of textured structures on the surface of the intrinsic amorphous silicon layer, and a surface of the transparent conductive layer away from the substrate has a plurality of textured structures respectively corresponding to the plurality of textured structures on the surface of the first doped conductive layer. Figure 2.
Kim is silent as to whether the one or more electrodes are in ohmic contact with the second doped conductive layer.
However, Haase, which deals with multi-junction solar cells, teaches the rear electrode of such a multi-junction solar cell is formed either as a continuous layer or a segmented electrode and provides an ohmic contact to the solar cell. Page 5, Lines 6-10.
It would have been obvious to one ordinarily skilled in the art at a time before the effective filing date of the claimed invention the combination of Kim with Haase is the use of a known technique to improve a similar device in the same way. Both Kim and Haase disclose multi-junction solar cells comprising a back electrode, wherein the back electrode is a metal electrode that is either continuous or patterned/segmented. Haase explicitly teaches forming the back electrode in ohmic contact with the solar cells. It would have been obvious to one ordinarily skilled in the art at a time before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize this same technique to form the back electrode taught by Kim because Haase teaches this is an effective rear electrode arrangement of a multi-junction solar cell, meaning the modification has a reasonable expectation of success.
With respect to claim 4, modified Kim teaches each of the substrate and the first doped conductive layer include first doped ions and the second doped conductive layer includes second doped ions, wherein the first doped ions are P-type and the second doped ions are N-type or the first doped ions are N-type and the second doped ions are P-type. Paragraphs 74-80.
With respect to claim 11, modified Kim teaches the thin-film solar cell includes a perovskite solar cell. Paragraph 88.
(3)
Claims 3, 9 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2021/0175450) in view of Haase (WO 2012/173959 A2), as applied to claims 1, 4 and 11 above, and further in view of Mishima et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2019/0081189).
With respect to claims 3, 9 and 10, modified Kim teaches the tandem solar cell comprising the requisite texturing, but is silent as to whether the heights of the plurality of textured structures of the surface of the substrate facing towards the intrinsic amorphous silicon layer in the first direction range from 50 nm to 1 micron, if the thickness of the first doped conductive layer is between 5 to 30 nm and a thickness of the intrinsic amorphous silicon layer is between 1 nm to 10 nm.
However, Mishima teaches a similarly structured tandem solar cell, wherein the heights of the plurality of textured structures of the surface of the substrate (42) facing towards the intrinsic amorphous silicon layer in the first direction are 0.5 microns, which is within the claimed range. Figure 1 and Paragraph 34. Mishima teaches the thickness of the first doped conductive layer (41) is between 3 to 30 nm. Figure 1 and Paragraph 31. Mishima teaches the thickness of the intrinsic amorphous silicon layer (45) in the first direction is between 2 to 15 nm. Paragraph 30. As per the MPEP, "where the claimed ranges overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art a prima facie case of obviousness exists." MPEP 2144.05(I) (internal citation omitted).
It would have been obvious to one ordinarily skilled in the art at a time before the effective filing date of the claimed invention the combination of modified Kim with Mishima is the use of a known technique to improve a similar device in the same way. Both modified Kim and Mishima are directed toward perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells. Mishima teaches specific dimensions for the textured surface of the substrate facing towards the intrinsic amorphous silicon layer, the thickness of the first doped conductive layer and the thickness of the intrinsic amorphous silicon layer. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one ordinarily skilled in the art at a time before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the dimensions taught by Mishima in modified Kim’s tandem solar cell because Mishima teaches them to be effective for a similarly structured device, meaning the modification has a reasonable expectation of success.
(4)
Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2021/0175450) in view of Haase (WO 2012/173959 A2), as applied to claims 1, 4 and 11 above, and further in view of Fogel et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2014/0048122).
With respect to claim 5, modified Kim teaches the first doped conductive layer includes first doped ions that are either P-type or N-type, but is silent as to the dopant concentration.
However, Fogel, which deals with solar cells, teaches a dopant concentration of P-type or N-type conductive silicon layer in a solar cell typically ranges from 1x1015 atoms/cm3 to 1x1021 atoms/cm3. Paragraph 34.
It would have been obvious to one ordinarily skilled in the art at a time before the effective filing date of the claimed invention the combination of modified Kim with Fogel is the use of a known technique to improve a similar device in the same way. Both modified Kim and Fogel teach solar cell devices comprising P-type or N-type conductivity layers having doping ions therein. Fogel teaches a doping concentration of 1x1015 atoms/cm3 to 1x1021 atoms/cm3 is an effective dopant level for such a layer. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one ordinarily skilled in the art at a time before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize a doping concentration in the range taught by Fogel because Fogel teaches this to be an effective ion doping amount, meaning the modification has a reasonable expectation of success.
(6)
Claims 6-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2021/0175450) in view of Haase (WO 2012/173959 A2), as applied to claims 1, 4 and 11 above, and further in view of Heng et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2018/0108796).
With respect to claim 6, modified Kim teaches the second conductive layer has a rear electrode in ohmic contact therewith, wherein the rear electrode may be patterned, such as into a segmented arrangement. Kim, Figure 2 and Paragraphs 85 and 86 and Haase, Page 5, Lines 6-10.
Modified Kim is silent as to whether the second conductive layer upon which the rear electrode is formed has first and second doped regions with the first doped regions having a greater doping concentration than the second doped region and the electrodes being in ohmic contact with the first doped regions.
However, Heng, which deals with solar cells, teaches the doping concentration determines the contact resistance with the electrode disposed thereon, wherein a high doping concentration results in higher built-in potential, which in turn can result in stronger tunneling effects. Paragraph 52.
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one ordinarily skilled in the art at a time before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to form the regions of the second doped conductive layer that are in contact with the segmented rear electrode with a higher doping concentration than other regions of the second doped conductive layer because Heng teaches doing so results in higher built-in potential, which in turn can result in stronger tunneling effects.
Furthermore, in the combination of Kim, Haase and Heng, as explained above, the second doped conductive layer has first and second doped regions, the first region having a higher dopant concentration than the second region, wherein the one or more electrodes are in ohmic contact with the first doped regions, and the segmented electrode pattern leads to an interleaved doping region arrangement. Kim, Paragraphs 85 and 86; Haase, Page 5, Lines 6-11; and Heng, Paragraph 52.
With respect to claim 7, modified Kim teaches surfaces of the first doped regions facing towards the one or more electrodes are textured surfaces. Figure 2.
With respect to claim 8, modified Kim teaches the first doped region is determined based on the electrode location to obtain higher built-in potential, which in turn can result in stronger tunneling effects at the electrode, meaning one or more orthographic projections of the one or more electrodes on a surface of the second doped conductive layer facing towards the one or more electrodes are located within one or more respective first doped regions of the first doped regions. Kim, Paragraphs 85 and 86; Haase, Page 5, Lines 6-11; and Heng, Paragraph 52.
(7)
Claims 12 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2021/0175450) in view of Haase (WO 2012/173959 A2), as applied to claims 1, 4 and 11 above, and further in view of Bjork et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2017/0323993).
With respect to claim 12, modified Kim teaches a solar cell (100) comprising a thin-film solar cell (120) and a bottom cell (110) stacked in a first direction, wherein the bottom cell includes a transparent conductive layer (114), a first doped conductive layer (112-2), an intrinsic amorphous silicon layer (112-1), a substrate (111) and a second doped conductive layer (113-2) that are stacked in the first direction. Figure 2 and Paragraphs 52, 56, 64, 74-80, 169 and 170. The transparent conductive layer is between the thin-film solar cell and the first doped conductive layer. Figure 2. The first doped conductive layer includes a doped amorphous silicon layer. Paragraphs 74-80.
Kim further teaches the surface of the substrate facing the intrinsic amorphous silicon layer has a plurality of textured structures, a surface of the intrinsic amorphous silicon layer away from the substrate has a plurality of textured structures respectively corresponding to the plurality of textured structures on the surface of the substrate, a surface of the first doped conductive layer away from the substrate has a plurality of textured structures respectively corresponding to the plurality of textured structures on the surface of the intrinsic amorphous silicon layer, and a surface of the transparent conductive layer away from the substrate has a plurality of textured structures respectively corresponding to the plurality of textured structures on the surface of the first doped conductive layer. Figure 2.
Modified Kim further teaches one or more electrodes (52) are formed on a side of the second doped conductive layer away from the substrate in ohmic contact with the second doped conductive layer. Kim, Figure 2 and Paragraphs 85 and 86 and Haase, Page 5, Lines 6-10.
Modified Kim is silent as to whether the multijunction solar cell is disposed within a photovoltaic module meeting the requirements of the claimed invention.
However, Bjork, which deals with photovoltaic devices, teaches a tandem junction solar cell is formed into a module comprising serially-connected tandem solar cells in a string, wherein the solar cells are encapsulated with EVA to seal a top glass cover thereto. Figures 5 and 6 and Paragraphs 36, 45 and 60. Bjork teaches this forms a hermetically sealed package. Paragraph 47.
It would have been obvious to one ordinarily skilled in the art at a time before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use modified Kim’s tandem solar cells to form a module, as taught by Bjork, because Bjork teaches doing so obtains a serially-interconnected string of tandem solar cells that are hermetically sealed.
With respect to claim 15, modified Kim teaches each of the substrate and the first doped conductive layer include first doped ions and the second doped conductive layer includes second doped ions, wherein the first doped ions are P-type and the second doped ions are N-type or the first doped ions are N-type and the second doped ions are P-type. Paragraphs 74-80.
(8)
Claims 14 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2021/0175450) in view of Haase (WO 2012/173959 A2) and Bjork et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2017/0323993) as applied to claims 12 and 15 above, and further in view of Mishima et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2019/0081189).
With respect to claims 14 and 20, modified Kim teaches the tandem solar cell comprising the requisite texturing, but is silent as to whether the heights of the plurality of textured structures of the surface of the substrate facing towards the intrinsic amorphous silicon layer in the first direction range from 50 nm to 1 micron and the thickness of the first doped conductive layer is between 5 to 30 nm.
However, Mishima teaches a similarly structured tandem solar cell, wherein the heights of the plurality of textured structures of the surface of the substrate (42) facing towards the intrinsic amorphous silicon layer in the first direction are 0.5 microns, which is within the claimed range. Figure 1 and Paragraph 34. Mishima teaches the thickness of the first doped conductive layer (41) is between 3 to 30 nm. Figure 1 and Paragraph 31. As per the MPEP, "where the claimed ranges overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art a prima facie case of obviousness exists." MPEP 2144.05(I) (internal citation omitted).
It would have been obvious to one ordinarily skilled in the art at a time before the effective filing date of the claimed invention the combination of modified Kim with Mishima is the use of a known technique to improve a similar device in the same way. Both modified Kim and Mishima are directed toward perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells. Mishima teaches specific dimensions for the textured surface of the substrate facing towards the intrinsic amorphous silicon layer and the thickness of the first doped conductive layer. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one ordinarily skilled in the art at a time before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the dimensions taught by Mishima in modified Kim’s tandem solar cell because Mishima teaches them to be effective for a similarly structured device, meaning the modification has a reasonable expectation of success.
(9)
Claim 16 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2021/0175450) in view of Haase (WO 2012/173959 A2) and Bjork et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2017/0323993) as applied to claims 12 and 15 above, and further in view of Fogel et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2014/0048122).
With respect to claim 16, modified Kim teaches the first doped conductive layer includes first doped ions that are either P-type or N-type, but is silent as to the dopant concentration.
However, Fogel, which deals with solar cells, teaches a dopant concentration of P-type or N-type conductive silicon layer in a solar cell typically ranges from 1x1015 atoms/cm3 to 1x1021 atoms/cm3. Paragraph 34.
It would have been obvious to one ordinarily skilled in the art at a time before the effective filing date of the claimed invention the combination of modified Kim with Fogel is the use of a known technique to improve a similar device in the same way. Both modified Kim and Fogel teach solar cell devices comprising P-type or N-type conductivity layers having doping ions therein. Fogel teaches a doping concentration of 1x1015 atoms/cm3 to 1x1021 atoms/cm3 is an effective dopant level for such a layer. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one ordinarily skilled in the art at a time before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize a doping concentration in the range taught by Fogel because Fogel teaches this to be an effective ion doping amount, meaning the modification has a reasonable expectation of success.
(10)
Claims 17-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2021/0175450) in view of Haase (WO 2012/173959 A2) and Bjork et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2017/0323993) as applied to claims 12 and 15 above, and further in view of Heng et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2018/0108796).
With respect to claim 17, modified Kim teaches the second conductive layer has a rear electrode in ohmic contact therewith, wherein the rear electrode may be patterned, such as into a segmented arrangement. Kim, Figure 2 and Paragraphs 85 and 86 and Haase, Page 5, Lines 6-10.
Modified Kim is silent as to whether the second conductive layer upon which the rear electrode is formed has first and second doped regions with the first doped regions having a greater doping concentration than the second doped region and the electrodes being in ohmic contact with the first doped regions.
However, Heng, which deals with solar cells, teaches the doping concentration determines the contact resistance with the electrode disposed thereon, wherein a high doping concentration results in higher built-in potential, which in turn can result in stronger tunneling effects. Paragraph 52.
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one ordinarily skilled in the art at a time before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to form the regions of the second doped conductive layer that are in contact with the segmented rear electrode with a higher doping concentration than other regions of the second doped conductive layer because Heng teaches doing so results in higher built-in potential, which in turn can result in stronger tunneling effects.
Furthermore, in the combination of Kim, Haase, Bjork and Heng, as explained above, the second doped conductive layer has first and second doped regions, the first region having a higher dopant concentration than the second region, wherein the one or more electrodes are in ohmic contact with the first doped regions, and the segmented electrode pattern leads to an interleaved doping region arrangement. Kim, Paragraphs 85 and 86; Haase, Page 5, Lines 6-11; and Heng, Paragraph 52.
With respect to claim 18, modified Kim teaches surfaces of the first doped regions facing towards the one or more electrodes are textured surfaces. Figure 2.
With respect to claim 19, modified Kim teaches the first doped region is determined based on the electrode location to obtain higher built-in potential, which in turn can result in stronger tunneling effects at the electrode, meaning one or more orthographic projections of the one or more electrodes on a surface of the second doped conductive layer facing towards the one or more electrodes are located within one or more respective first doped regions of the first doped regions. Kim, Paragraphs 85 and 86; Haase, Page 5, Lines 6-11; and Heng, Paragraph 52.
(11)
Response to Arguments
Applicant’s arguments are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection. Applicant’s amendment necessitated the rejection.
(12)
Conclusion
Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ELI S MEKHLIN whose telephone number is (571)270-7597. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:00 am to 5:00 pm EST.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Duane Smith can be reached at 571-272-1166. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/ELI S MEKHLIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1759