Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/407,805

HIDDEN MIRROR TETHER

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 09, 2024
Examiner
CHERRY, EUNCHA P
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Gentex Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
919 granted / 1044 resolved
+20.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
1062
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
39.6%
-0.4% vs TC avg
§102
48.5%
+8.5% vs TC avg
§112
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1044 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 11 is objected to because of the following informalities: the phrase “at least one at printed circuit board” appears to have a typo. It appears that “at” should be deleted or an appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 6, 9 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Minikey, JR. et al (US 2016/0159287 A1, Minikey). Regarding claim 1, Minikey discloses a rearview mirror assembly for a vehicle (Figs. 1-14A) comprising: a housing (para 28, “housing 30”); a mounting bracket (para 45, “internal support 107”) connected to the housing (see Fig. 4, when the mirror is assembled 107 is connected to 30); a mounting member (para 45, “mount 105”) extending between a member first end (Fig. 4, one end close to 32) configured to attach to an overhead structure (para 44, “mounting member 32”) of the vehicle (para 28, “32 is adapted for mounting on a windshield or a headliner of a vehicle”) and a connection end (Fig. 4, the other end close to housing 30) connected to the mounting bracket (para 45, “a plurality of fasteners 108 secure … 107 with … 105”); and a tether (para 45, “wire harness 109”) including a first end connected to the mounting bracket (see Fig. 5, one end of 109 is connected to 107), the tether (109) extending at least partially through a hollow interior (para 45, “109 is routed through barrel 111”) of the mounting member (105) to a second end (close to 32) that is configured to attach to the overhead structure of the vehicle (see Fig. 4, the second end is configured to attach to 32, also Figs. 3 an 3A show 109 attached to 32). Regarding claim 6, the rearview mirror assembly of claim 1, wherein the connection end forms a joint (by 108) with the mounting bracket (107) permitting relative articulation (Fig. 4, by actuator device 110) between the mounting bracket (107) and the mounting member (105). Regarding claim 9, the rearview mirror assembly of claim 1, wherein the tether includes a cord extending between the first end and the second end (see Figs. 3A and 4, 109 extends between 32 and 107). Regarding claim 10, the rearview mirror assembly of claim 1, wherein the member first end defines a slot and the tether extends through the slot (see Fig. 3A, 109 is extends through the slot of 105). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-5, 11-13 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Minikey, JR. et al (US 2016/0159287 A1, Minikey) in view of Fllipiak (US 8,201,800 B2). Regarding claim 2, Minikey discloses the claimed invention as set forth above except for wherein the rearview mirror assembly includes at least one electronic component located in the housing. Fillipiak disclose wherein the rearview mirror assembly includes at least one electronic component located in the housing (column 4, lines 65-67, “reflect element 16 includes an electro-chromic material positioned between the front glass element 100 and the rear glass element 102”). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention before the effective filing date to include at least one electronic component such as electrochromic mirror for the purpose of improving night driving safety, reducing drive fatigue and eye strain and providing clearer overall rear view. Regarding claim 3, Fillipiak discloses wherein the at least one electronic component includes a power supply wiring (Fig. 5 and column 5, line 40 “wiring 50”) routed at least partially through the hollow interior of the mounting member (Fig. 5, see 40 has a hollow interior wherein the wiring 50 is routed through), but silent on a tether cord. Minikey has a tether cord extending at least partially through the hollow interior of the mounting member, but silent on a power supply wiring. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention before the effective filing date to put both the tether cord and the power supply wiring extending at least partially through the hollow interior of the mounting member for the purpose of completely hiding wires from view, avoiding dangling or exposed cables along the headliner, and further improving safety because exposed wires can distract the driver or get caught on objects. Hidden routing reduces these risks and protects wires from damage. Regarding claim 4, the rearview mirror assembly of claim 3, wherein the at least one electronic component includes an electro-optic assembly (Fillipiak, column 4, lines 65-67, “reflect element 16 includes an electro-chromic material positioned between the front glass element 100 and the rear glass element 102”). Regarding claim 5, the rearview mirror assembly of claim 4, wherein the at least one electronic component further includes a camera and a light source (Fillipiak, column 16, line 1, “camera” camera inherently has a light source). Regarding claim 11, Minikey discloses a rearview mirror assembly for a vehicle (Figs. 1-14A) comprising: a housing (para 28, “housing 30”); a mounting bracket (para 45, “internal support 107”) connected to the housing (see Fig. 4, when the mirror is assembled 107 is connected to 30); a mounting member (para 45, “mount 105”) extending between a member first end (Fig. 4, one end close to 32) configured to attach to an overhead structure (para 44, “mounting member 32”) of the vehicle (para 28, “32 is adapted for mounting on a windshield or a headliner of a vehicle”) and a connection end (Fig. 4, the other end close to housing 30) connected to the mounting bracket (para 45, “a plurality of fasteners 108 secure … 107 with … 105”); and a tether (para 45, “wire harness 109”) including a cord (109 is a cord) having a first end connected to the mounting bracket (see Fig. 5, one end of 109 is connected to 107), the cord (109) extending at least partially through a hollow interior (para 45, “109 is routed through barrel 111”) of the mounting member (105) to a second end (close to 32) that is configured to attach to the overhead structure of the vehicle (see Fig. 4, the second end is configured to attach to 32, also Figs. 3 an 3A show 109 attached to 32). However, Minikey does not disclose: at least one electronic component and at least one at printed circuit board ("PCB") in the housing that controls functionality of the at least one electronic component; a power supply wiring extending at least partially through a hollow interior of the mounting member and operably coupled to the at least one PCB. Fillipiak disclose wherein the rearview mirror assembly includes at least one electronic component (column 4, lines 65-67, “reflect element 16 includes an electro-chromic material positioned between the front glass element 100 and the rear glass element 102”) and at least one at printed circuit board (Fig. 1 and column 4, lines 18-26 and lines 43-50, “circuit board 38 and the reflective element 16 are located adjacent the carrier plate 32”) in the housing (see Fig. 1, 38 and 16 are in the housing) that controls functionality of the at least one electronic component (column 5, lines 40-45, “wiring 50 is routed through the mounting bracket 29 and into the housing 12 for supplying and/or receiving power and control to circuits on the circuit board 38 … the wiring 50 can be used to power the EC mirror … or power and/or control and of the electrical components …”); and a power supply wiring (Fig. 5 and column 5, line 40 “wiring 50”) extending at least partially through a hollow interior of the mounting member (Fig. 5, see 40 has a hollow interior wherein the wiring 50 is routed through), and operably coupled to the at least one PCB (see Fig. 4, 50 is operably coupled to 38). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention before the effective filing date to include at least one electronic component such as electrochromic mirror for the purpose of improving night driving safety, reducing drive fatigue and eye strain and providing clearer overall rear view; then further it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention before the effective filing date to put both the tether cord and the power supply wiring extending at least partially through the hollow interior of the mounting member for the purpose of completely hiding wires from view, avoiding dangling or exposed cables along the headliner, and further improving safety because exposed wires can distract the driver or get caught on objects. Hidden routing reduces these risks and protects wires from damage. Regarding claim 12, the rearview mirror assembly of claim 11, wherein the cord includes a length that provides an amount of slack less than an amount of slack than the power supply wiring (Minikey’s 109 shown in Fig. 4 appears to have less slack than Fllipaik’s 50 shown in Fig. 4). Regarding claim 13, the rearview mirror assembly of claim 12, wherein the at least one electronic component includes at least one of an electro-optic assembly, a camera, or a light source (Fillipiak, column 16, line 1, “camera” camera inherently has a light source). Regarding claim 15, Minikey in view of Fillipiak discloses the claimed invention as set forth above except for wherein the at least one PCB includes a first PCB and a second PCB, both operably coupled to the power supply wiring. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention before the effective filing date to have the at least one PCB includes a first PCB and a second PCB, both operably coupled to the power supply wiring for the purpose of achieving modular design and easier upgrades/manufacturing and better space utilization in compact housing. Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Minikey, JR. et al (US 2016/0159287 A1, Minikey) in view of Fllipiak (US 8,201,800 B2) as applied to claims above, and further in view of Zhao et al (US 2021/0097864 A1). Minikey in view of Fillipiak discloses the claimed invention as set forth above except for wherein the at least one electronic component includes a communication module for contacting emergency services. Zhao discloses at least one electronic component includes a communication module for contacting emergency services (para 101). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention before the effective filing date to have at least one electronic component including a communication module for contacting emergency as taught by Zhao for the purpose of contacting emergency services in the event of emergency for assistance. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7 and 8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 16-20 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claims 7 and 8, claims are allowable at least for the reason that the prior art does not teach or reasonably suggest the mounting bracket defines a post extending from the mounting bracket to a chamfer, and the first end of the tether is looped around the post and retained by the chamfer as set forth in the claimed combination. Regarding claims 16-20, claims are allowable at least for the reason that the prior art does not teach or reasonably suggest the mounting bracket defining a post and the tether having a first end defining a loop extending around the post as set forth in the claimed combination. Minikey discloses a rearview mirror assembly for a vehicle (Figs. 1-14A) comprising: a housing (para 28, “housing 30”); a mounting bracket (para 45, “internal support 107”) connected to the housing (see Fig. 4, when the mirror is assembled 107 is connected to 30); a mounting member (para 45, “mount 105”) extending between a member first end (Fig. 4, one end close to 32) configured to attach to an overhead structure (para 44, “mounting member 32”) of the vehicle (para 28, “32 is adapted for mounting on a windshield or a headliner of a vehicle”) and a connection end (Fig. 4, the other end close to housing 30) connected to the mounting bracket (para 45, “a plurality of fasteners 108 secure … 107 with … 105”); and a tether including cord (para 45, “wire harness 109”) including a first end connected to the mounting bracket (see Fig. 5, one end of 109 is connected to 107), the cord (109) extending to a second end (close to 32) that is configured to attach to the overhead structure of the vehicle (see Fig. 4, the second end is configured to attach to 32, also Figs. 3 an 3A show 109 attached to 32). However, Minikey does not disclose the mounting bracket defining a post and the tether having a first end defining a loop extending around the post as set forth in the claimed combination. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EUNCHA P CHERRY whose telephone number is (571)272-2310. The examiner can normally be reached M to F 7am to 3:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Pinping Sun can be reached at (571) 270-1284. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. 12/26/2025 /EUNCHA P CHERRY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 09, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Apr 02, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601906
SCANNING MIRROR SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12591133
Enhanced microelectromechanical system mirror apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589991
LOCKING MECHANISMS FOR PRECISION OFFSET/DEPLOYMENT OF MEMS STRUCTURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589986
Low Voltage Electrostatic MEMS Actuators for Large Angle Tip, Tilt, and Piston Beamsteering
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585105
APPARATUS, METHODS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR PROVIDING CONTROL SIGNALS FOR LASER SCANNING SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+9.1%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1044 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month