Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/408,233

MOWING MACHINE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jan 09, 2024
Examiner
RAILEY, JENNIFER A
Art Unit
3676
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
65 granted / 81 resolved
+28.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
102
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
40.8%
+0.8% vs TC avg
§102
28.7%
-11.3% vs TC avg
§112
26.7%
-13.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 81 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 2 and 3 recite the limitation "the load" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. For the purposes of examination, it is assumed that this load is a predicted load versus the current load. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hitachi Koki KK (WO 2017/154524 A1), hereinafter Hitachi. Regarding claims 1, Hitachi discloses a mowing machine (1, fig. 1, line 296 on page 8), comprising: a memory (microcomputer, wherein a microcomputer has a memory, lines 285-289 on page 7); a processor coupled to the memory (microcomputer, wherein a microcomputer has a processor, lines 285-289 on page 7); and a mowing machine main body (main body cover 2, fig. 1, line 237 on page 6) including a drive motor configured (16a and 16b, fig. 2, lines 297-300 on page 8) to drive a movement mechanism (12a and 13b, fig. 2, lines 297-300 on page 8) and a cutting blade motor (30, fig. 3, lines 297-300 on page 8) configured to drive a cutting blade (35, fig. 3, lines 297-300 on page 8) configured to cut grass (lines 78-80), wherein the processor is configured to: acquire information related to a state of grass growth (379-412 and 468-483, wherein the load is detected and then the path planned to limit the load) in a mowing target region (mowing area 290, line 46), predict a load that will be applied to the cutting blade motor at a time of cutting the grass based on the acquired information related to the state of grass growth (lines 345-366), set a travel path based on the predicted load, and control driving of the drive motor such that the mowing machine main body travels along the set travel path (lines 345-366). Regarding claims 2, Hitachi further discloses wherein the processor is further configured to set the travel path such that an accumulated value of the load does not exceed a predetermined threshold value (lines 109-111 and 468-483, wherein the load is detected and then the path planned to limit the load). Regarding claims 3, Hitachi further discloses wherein the processor is further configured to set the travel path such that a maximum value of the load does not exceed a predetermined threshold value (lines 109-111 and 468-483, wherein the load is detected and then the path planned to limit the load). Regarding claims 4, Hitachi further discloses wherein the processor is further configured to set an initial travel path relative to the mowing target region (lines 416-426), and to set the travel path by correcting the initial travel path based on the predicted load (lines 468-483, wherein the load is detected and then the path planned to limit the load). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jennifer A Railey whose telephone number is (571)270-7353. The examiner can normally be reached M-F (8-4). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tara Schimpf can be reached at (571) 270-7741. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JENNIFER A RAILEY/Examiner, Art Unit 3676 /Nicole Coy/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3672
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 09, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12584373
Casing Attachment System for Attenuating Annular Pressure Buildup
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12553338
DOWNHOLE FLUID SAMPLING SYSTEM WITH HYDRAULIC ACTUATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12538866
AGRICULTURAL DISC MOWER WITH KNIVES, A SPRING PLATE, AND A KNIFE NUT THAT ACTS AS A STOP
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12529309
DOWNHOLE ROCK MECHANICS CHARACTERISATION TOOL, ASSEMBLY AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12497839
BIOINSPIRED HORIZONTAL SELF-BURROWING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+6.4%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 81 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month