Detailed Action
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Claim Objections
Claim 18 is objected to because of the following informalities: Grammatical error present in sixth line of claims filed 5/27/2026. Appropriate correction is required.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claim(s) 1-9, 17-20, 22, 29-30 is are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bagheri et al. (US 2020/0196381 A1) in further view of Ren et al. (US 2019/0342905 A1).
Regarding claims 1 and 30, Bagheri discloses an apparatus for wireless communication and method, comprising:
at least one transceiver;
one or more memories (see memory [0117]), individually or in combination, having instructions; and one or more processors (see instructions and processors in [0140] ), individually or in combination, configured to execute the instructions and cause the apparatus to: obtain a first-stage downlink control information (DCI) of a multi-stage DCI messaging scheme (see [0085], “receives a first-level DCI”), wherein the first-stage DCI is configured to schedule transmission of a second-stage DCI (see [0085], “The first-level DCI includes information the UE 126 uses to decode a second-level DCI received at 724, during the sixth sTTI of the subframe”); and comprises resource information indicating resources associated with the second-stage DCI (see [0085], “The first-level DCI includes information the UE 126 uses to decode a second-level DCI ”), the second-stage DCI ((detect the second-dci [0088])) using the resource information; and
start or restart a timer (see [0092], “starting a second timer that extends the active time by a second timer value”) after receiving at least one of the first-stage DCI or the second-stage DCI (see [0089], “ receiving the second-level DCI triggers an extension”);
Bagheri does not specifically disclose however REN discloses receive, via a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) and via the at least one transceiver (see PDSCH can carry second-level DCI, [0065]),
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to combine the teachings of Bagheri with that of Ren. Doing so would conform to well-known techniques in the field of invention.
Regarding claim 18, Bagheri discloses an apparatus for wireless communication, comprising:
At least one transceiver
one or more memories (see memory [0117]), individually or in combination, having instructions (see instructions and processors in [0140]); and one or more processors, individually or in combination, configured to execute the instructions and cause the apparatus to:
transmit to a user equipment (UE) (UE receives, from BS, [0085]) via the at least on transceiver, a configuration message (UE receives configuration [0069]) configuring the UE to start or restart a timer (see starts timer [0092]) associated with a multi-state downlink control information (DCI) messging scheme, wherein the multi-stage DCI messaging scheme comprises a first-stage DCI and a second stage DCI (see [0087], “a first- and second-level DCI”, two part scheduling assignment [0087]); and
transmit, to the UE, via the at least one transceiver, the first-stage DCI (see [0087], first level DCI) wherein the first-stage DCI is configured to schedule transmission of the second-stage DCI (see [0085], “The first-level DCI includes information the UE 126 uses to decode a second-level DCI received at 724, during the sixth sTTI of the subframe”) and comprises resource information indicating resources to be used for transmitting the second-stage DCI (The first-level DCI includes information the UE 126 uses to decode a second-level DCI )
Bagheri does not explciltly disclose however Ren discloses transmitting the second-stage DCI via a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) (see PDSCH can carry second-level DCI, [0065]),;
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to combine the teachings of Bagheri with that of Ren. Doing so would conform to well-known techniques in the field of invention.
Regarding claim 2, Bagheri discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors, individually or in combination, are further configured to cause the apparatus to:
Receifve, via the at least one transceiver, a configuration message indicative of whether the start or restart of the timer occurs (see [0118], “control signal can be a radio resource control (RRC) signal, MAC-CE signal, or a sPDCCH/PDCCH signal indicating the TTI length) after receiving the first-stage DCI or after receiving the second-stage DCI (see [0087], “ reception of the second-level DCI at 724 alone serves as an indication”).
Regarding claims 3 & 19, Bagheri discloses the apparatus of claims 2 & 18, wherein the configuration message is further indicative of at least one of a time at which the start or restart of the timer occurs (see second timer that extends the active time by a second timer value specifying an amount of time, [0094]).
Regarding claims 4 & 20, Bagheri discloses the apparatus of claims 2 & 18, wherein the first-stage DCI is further configured to schedule transmission of multiple second-stage DCIs including the second-stage DCI, and wherein the configuration message is further indicative of the second-stage DCI triggering (see [0089], “DCI triggers an extension”) the start or restart of the timer (see “starting a second timer that extends” [0092]).
Regarding claim 5, Bagheri discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the timer is configured with a duration of time (see on-duration time [0102]) for operations associated with both a single-stage DCI messaging scheme and the multi-stage DCI messaging scheme (see “ two-part scheduling assignment” in [0087], which is how instant application defines messaging scheme).
Regarding claim 6, Bagheri discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the timer is configured with a first duration of time for operations associated with a single-stage DCI messaging scheme (see [0081], “[0081] As the on-duration timer again runs over a time interval 622 at the beginning of DRX cycle 620, the UE 126 receives a data transmission scheduling assignment from the eNB 102 at time 605. Reception of the data transmission scheduling assignment initializes the inactivity timer which runs over the time interval ”, therefore each one), wherein the timer is configured with a second duration of time for operations associated with the multi-stage DCI messaging scheme (see “second on-duration”, [0067]), and wherein the first duration of time is different than the second duration of time (see [0067], “first on-duration timer value being larger than the second on-duration timer”).
Regarding claim 7, Bagheri discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the timer is configured with a duration of time for both the first-stage DCI and the second-stage DCI (see [0081] duration of scheduling assignment is extended for both).
Regarding claim 8, Bagheri discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the timer is configured with a first duration of time for operations associated with first-stage DCI, wherein the timer is configured with a second duration of time for operations associated with the second-stage DCI, and wherein the first duration of time is different than the second duration of time (see [0067], “first on-duration timer value being larger than the second on-duration timer”).
Regarding claim 9, Bagheri discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the timer is a discontinuous reception (DRX) inactive timer (see [0049], “DRX inactivity timer”), and wherein the timer is started or restarted if at least one of the first-stage DCI or the second-stage DCI is indicative of a future transmission intended for the apparatus (see [0051], “A DRX Start”).
Regarding claim 17, Bagheri discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the apparatus is configured as a user equipment (UE) (see fig. 1, inherent in the art) .
Regarding claim 22, Bagheri discloses the apparatus of claim 18, wherein the timer is a discontinuous reception (DRX) inactive timer, and wherein the configuration message further configures the UE to start or restart (see start [0053]) the timer if at least one of the first-stage DCI or the second-stage DCI schedules a future transmission intended for the UE (DRX inactivity timer, [0049]).
Regarding claim 29, Bagheri discloses the apparatus of claim 19, wherein the apparatus is configured as a network entity (see fig. 1, note network node and inherency).
Claim(s) 10-12, 16, 23-25 & 28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bagheri et al. (US 2020/0196381 A1) in view of MolavianJazi et al. (US 2024/0032062 A1).
Regarding claims 10 & 23, Bagheri discloses the apparatus of claims 1 and ,
Bagheri does not specifically disclose however MolavianJazi discloses wherein the timer is a bandwidth part (BWP) inactivity timer (see [0219] BWP inactivity timer), and wherein the timer is started or restarted (see start [0219]) if at least one of the first-stage DCI or the second-stage DCI schedules (see two stages of DCI alighment [0070]) a downlink assignment or an uplink grant via an active BWP (see uplink grant is received on the active BWP, [0212]) associated with the apparatus;
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to combine the teachings of MolavianJazi with that of Bagheri. Doing so would conform to well-known techniques in the field of invention.
Regarding claims 11 & 24, Bagheri discloses the apparatus of claims 1 and 18,
Bagheri does not specifically disclose however MolavianJazi discloses wherein the timer is a secondary cell (SCell) deactivation timer (see [0096], “sCellDeactivation Timer timer”), and wherein the timer is started or restarted (see [0109], “start or restart the sCellDeactivationTimer”) if at least one of the first-stage DCI or the second-stage DCI is received/transmitted via an active SCell link associated with the SCell deactivation timer (see [0096] sCellDeactivation Timer timer);
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to combine the teachings of MolavianJazi with that of Bagheri. Doing so would conform to well-known techniques in the field of invention.
Regarding claims 12 & 25, Bagheri discloses the apparatus of claims 1 and 25,
Bagheri does not specifically disclose however MolavianJazi discloses wherein the timer is a secondary cell (SCell) deactivation timer, and wherein the timer is started or restarted if:
the first-stage DCI is received/trans,otted via an active primary cell (PCell) link (see [0005], “first DCI format is on a primary cell (PCell)”), and the first-stage DCI schedules a downlink assignment or an uplink grant (see downlink assignments and uplink grant [0261]) for a communication between the apparatus and an active SCell associated with the SCell deactivation timer (see [0096] sCellDeactivation Timer timer);
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to combine the teachings of MolavianJazi with that of Bagheri. Doing so would conform to well-known techniques in the field of invention.
Regarding claim 16, Bagheri discloses the apparatus of claim 1,
Bagheri does not specifically disclose however MolavianJazi discloses wherein the first-stage DCI comprises an indication of whether to start or restart the timer after receiving the second-stage DCI, and wherein the indication of whether to start or restart the timer is realized via at least one of a field or a radio network temporary identifier (RNTI) in the first-stage DCI (see [0212] RNTI indicating downlink assignment);
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to combine the teachings of MolavianJazi with that of Bagheri. Doing so would conform to well-known techniques in the field of invention.
Regarding claim 28, Bagheri discloses the apparatus of claim 18, wherein the one or more processors, individually or in combination, are further configured to cause the apparatus to: transmit, to the UE via the at least one transceiver the second-stage DCI, wherein the first-stage DCI comprises an indication configured to cause the UE to start or restart the timer (see [0089], “receiving the second-level DCI triggers an extension”), and
wherein the indication configured to cause the UE to start or restart the timer is at least one of a field or a radio network temporary identifier (RNTI) in the first-stage DCI ((see [0212] RNTI indicating downlink assignment));
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to combine the teachings of MolavianJazi with that of Bagheri. Doing so would conform to well-known techniques in the field of invention.
Claim(s) 13-14 & 26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bagheri et al. (US 2020/0196381 A1) in view of Lin et al. (US 2020/0389874 A1).
Regarding claims 13 and 26, Bagheri discloses the apparatus of claim 1,
Bagheri does not specifically disclose however Lin discloses wherein the timer (see timer for search space sets [0278]) is a search space set group (SSSG) (see search space set group [0173]) timer, and wherein the timer is started or restarted (see timer “starts” [0282]) if of the first-stage or the second-stage DCI is received/transmitted via an active search space (see [0200] monitored, “active search space set in the DL BWP”);
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to combine the teachings of Lin with that of Bagheri. Doing so would conform to well-known techniques in the field of invention.
Regarding claim 14, Bagheri discloses the apparatus of claim 13,
Bagheri does not specifically disclose however Lin discloses wherein the active search space is a common search space (CSS) (see common search pace [0068]) or a user-equipment (UE) specific search space (USS).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to combine the teachings of Lin with that of Bagheri. Doing so would conform to well-known techniques in the field of invention.
Claim(s) 15 and 27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bagheri et al. (US 2020/0196381 A1) in view of CN 112217587 A.
Regarding claims 15 and 17, Bagheri discloses the apparatus of claims 1 and 18,
Bagheri does not explicitly disclose however CN 112217587 A1 discloses wherein the timer is a full-duplex switching timer, and wherein the timer is started or restarted if of the first-stage or second-stage DCI scheduled a full-duplex communication (see full-duplex timer for switching, process 2, page 1).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to combine the teachings of CN 112217587 A with that of Bagheri. Doing so would conform to well-known techniques in the field of invention.
Claim(s) 21 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bagheri et al. (US 2020/0196381 A1) in view of MolavianJazi et al. (US 2024/0032062 A1) in further view of Lin et al. (US 2020/0389874 A1).
Regarding claim 21, Bagheri discloses the apparatus of claim 18, wherein the configuration message is further indicative of whether the timer is a discontinuous reception (DRX) inactive timer (see [0049], DRX inactivity timer),
Bagheri does not specifically disclose however MolavianJazi discloses a bandwidth part (BWP) inactivity timer (see [0220], BWP inactivity timer), a secondary cell (SCell) deactivation timer (see sCell Deactivation Timer [096]),
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to combine the teachings of MolavianJazi with that of Bagheri. Doing so would conform to well-known techniques in the field of invention.
Bagheri in view of MolavainJazi does not specifically disclose however Lin discloses a search space set group (SSSG) timer (see timer for search space sets [0278]), or a full-duplex switching timer;
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to combine the teachings of Lin with that of Bagheri and MolavianJazi. Doing so would conform to well-known techniques in the field of invention.
Conclusion
Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to K. WILFORD SHAHEED whose telephone number is (469) 295-9175. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 9 am-6pm; CST; ALT Friday. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. The examiner’s Supervisor, Jinsong Hu, can be reached at (571)272-3965, where attempts to reach the examiner are unsuccessful.
Information regarding the status of an application may be receivedfrom the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be receivedfrom either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/KHALID W SHAHEED/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2643
Prosecution Insights