Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/410,073

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SMOOTH LANE POSITIONING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 11, 2024
Examiner
KWON, JOHN
Art Unit
3747
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Torc Robotics, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
679 granted / 792 resolved
+15.7% vs TC avg
Minimal -4% lift
Without
With
+-4.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
802
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
43.3%
+3.3% vs TC avg
§102
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
§112
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 792 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 2, 5-9, 12-16, 19 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WO 2008/089966 A2 (hereinafter WO ‘966). Regarding claims 1, 8, and 15, WO ‘966 discloses vehicle traveling through a lane width irregularity, the autonomy computing system comprising: at least one memory storing executable instructions defining a lane positioning module; and at least one processor, wherein the processor, upon executing the lane positioning module, is configured to: detect the lane width irregularity; select a lane marking to be used as a guide through the lane width irregularity, as below. PNG media_image1.png 359 890 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 378 859 media_image2.png Greyscale and maintain a predefined distance from the lane marking through the lane width irregularity. PNG media_image3.png 210 869 media_image3.png Greyscale However, the prior art reference does not expressly mention that this can be used in the autonomous vehicle traveling. Since WO ‘966 teaches to keep the vehicle within the lanes on the various road conditions of the lanes, it would be within the ability of one of ordinary in the art to apply such teaching to autonomous vehicle traveling. Regarding claims 2, 9, and 16, WO discloses the lane positioning module maintains a center position between a left lane marking and a right lane marking as explained. PNG media_image4.png 278 853 media_image4.png Greyscale Regarding claims 5, 12, and 19, the claimed solid line indication an outer lane marking of the roadway, it is considered a conventional way of marking of the end of the side of the roadway. Regarding claims 7, 14 and 20, the claimed the detecting irregularity the width by measuring solid line indication an outer lane marking of the roadway, it is considered a conventional measuring the width of the roadway because the width is measured between the two lines. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3, 4, 10, 11, 17 and 18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN KWON whose telephone number is (571)272-4846. The examiner can normally be reached M-F; 9A-5P. EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Phuttiwat Wongwian can be reached at 571-270-5426. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN KWON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3747 February 7, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 11, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 16, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12583427
METHOD AND ELECTRONIC CONTROL UNIT FOR CONTROLLING A BRAKE SYSTEM OF A MOTOR VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12565852
OIL PAN FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12546616
ENERGY CONSUMPTION PREDICTIONS, FEEDBACK, AND COACHING FOR OFF-ROAD ACTIVITIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12540038
Automatic Tuning and Control of a Linear Drive Based Independent Cart System with Initial Value Compensation
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12491769
SPINNING AND SLIDING DETECTION DEVICE AND SPINNING AND SLIDING DETECTION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (-4.2%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 792 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month