Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/410,331

LATCHES FOR MOVABLE BARRIERS OR THE LIKE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jan 11, 2024
Priority
Aug 01, 2018 — AU 2018902793 +2 more
Examiner
LUGO, CARLOS
Art Unit
3675
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
D & D Group Pty Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
957 granted / 1277 resolved
+22.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
1331
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
41.3%
+1.3% vs TC avg
§102
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
§112
39.0%
-1.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1277 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is in response to applicant’s amendment filed on 8/28/26. notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-5, 9, and 11-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US Pat No 9,476,228 to Karez et al (Karez) in view of US Pat No 4,514,996 to Sjogren and US Pat No 9,284,747 to Ward. PNG media_image1.png 454 804 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, Karez discloses a gate latch assembly mountable to a gate or post having at least one opening formed therein to provide access to a common axis extending through the gate or post (fig 14). The latch assembly comprises a latch (200), a remote actuating unit (90, 100) and a guide (22) formed separate to the latch and separate to the remote actuating unit. The guide is configured to be mounted between the gate or post and the latch. The latch and the remote actuating unit are configured to be connected by a connector (104) which connects the latch to the remote actuating unit via at least one opening formed in the gate or post. PNG media_image2.png 550 620 media_image2.png Greyscale The guide comprises a body adapted for locating on the gate or post. The guide body has two apertures (40a and 40b) formed therein, one of which is configured to align with the common axis so as to receive the connector therethrough. The guide body defines a reference axis adapted to be aligned in a vertical direction of the gate or post. The remote actuating unit is adapted for locating on the gate or post. PNG media_image3.png 493 757 media_image3.png Greyscale The guide body is configured to be mounted between the gate or post and the latch such that the guide facilitates installing the latch and the remote actuating unit aligned with the common axis. Karez fails to disclose that the guide body has two installation markers associated with the two apertures and that the remote actuating unit comprises an installation marker that is aligned with one of the installation markers of the guide body in a horizontal plane that is substantially perpendicular to the reference axis when the latch and remote actuator are aligned with the common axis. PNG media_image4.png 692 1256 media_image4.png Greyscale Karez illustrates that the unit and the latch comprise details that anyone can use as a marker for installation along the vertical direction defined by the reference axis. PNG media_image5.png 674 575 media_image5.png Greyscale Sjogren teaches that it is well known in the art to have a mounting plate that also serves as a template plate (34) so as to make the corresponding drill holes without the use of a template tool. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the guide plate described by Karez used as a template, as taught by Sjogren, in order to use the same member for installation and use, instead of additional members. PNG media_image6.png 571 1425 media_image6.png Greyscale Ward teaches that it is well known in the art to provide a guide with an installation marker associated with an aperture (160), and a remote member that is provided also with an installation marker that is aligned with the installation marker of the guide in a horizontal plane that is substantially perpendicular to a reference axis when the guide and the remote member are aligned with the common axis. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the guide plate and the remote unit described by Karez with markers intended as installation markers aligned with a common axis, as taught by Ward, in order to help the user to properly install the assembly in the structure without the use of another tool. As to claim 2, Karez discloses that the guide body includes an edge that in use is positioned adjacent to an edge of the door. Ward teaches that the guide includes an edge that in use is positioned adjacent an edge of the door, and the installation marker is formed on the edge of the guide body so as to be visible from a side of door. As to claim 3, Karez, as modified by Ward, teaches that the guide body is adapted so that each installation marker resides on the same plane as its respective aperture. As to claim 4, Karez discloses that the base (22) includes a main portion (39) and further comprising at least one flange (at 36) extending substantially perpendicular from the main portion of the body, the at least one flange including an inner surface, the at least one flange being adapted to facilitate fixing the guide body to a side of the gate or post. As to claim 5, Karez discloses that the two apertures (40a, 40b) are formed in the main portion of the base (22) so that they are coplanar. As to claim 9, Karez, as modified by Ward, teaches that the remote actuator (90, 100) overlies an edge of the gate or post so that the installation marker on the remote actuator is visible from the side of the gate or post (by flange 92). As to claim 11, Karez discloses that the connector (104) is adapted to be inserted through the opening in the gate or post extending along the common axis and co-operable between the remote actuating unit and the latch via the at least one aperture of the base. As to claim 12, Karez discloses that the latch and remote actuator each include connector portions for receiving opposed ends of the connector so as to allow for axial and/or rotation drive between the latch and remote actuator (at 80, 96). As to claims 13 and 14, Karez, as modified by Ward, teaches a method of installing a gate latch assembly as claimed. Claim(s) 6 and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US Pat No 9,476,228 to Karez et al (Karez) in view of US Pat No 4,514,996 to Sjogren, US Pat No 9,284,747 to Ward and further in view of US Pat No 2,634,507 to Boatwright. As to claim 6, Karez, as modified by Sjogren and Ward, fails to disclose that the guide body further comprises a pre-formed hole and each aperture is spaced equidistance from the pre-formed hole, such that when the body is rotated substantially about 180°, the position of the two apertures is in a mirrored orientation to suite installing on either one of opposed sides of the gate or post. PNG media_image7.png 460 515 media_image7.png Greyscale Karez discloses another embodiment (see above), wherein the base appears to being provided with a pre-formed hole. PNG media_image8.png 456 829 media_image8.png Greyscale Boatwright teaches that it is well known in the art to provide a guide body (10) with a pre-formed hole (54, 56) and apertures (22, 24) spaced equidistance from the pre-formed hole, such that when the body is rotated substantially about 180°, the position of the two apertures is in a mirrored orientation to suite installing on either one of opposed sides of the gate or post. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the guide body described by Karez, as modified by Sjogren and Ward, with pre-formed apertures and the rotation of the guide body to mirror orientation, as taught by Boatwright, in order to allow the guide body to be able to install the assembly in either orientation. As to claim 8, Karez, as modified by Ward and Boatwright, teaches that the pre-formed hole is linearly aligned with both apertures. Response to Arguments The applicant argues the rejection, based on Ward not teaching vertical movement, so as to align in the vertical direction. As mentioned above, Ward is only used to demonstrate that it is well known in the art to provide markers. The rejection is in view of Karez, as modified by Ward. Karez device is capable of being vertically moved so as to align the two elements of the device. Since no argument is persuasive, and the examiner will not change the position shown above, in order to expedite prosecution, applicant can file an appeal brief to allow the Board of Appeals to decide. Prosecution has been closed. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CARLOS LUGO whose telephone number is (571)272-7058. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kristina Fulton can be reached at (571)272-7376. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Carlos Lugo/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 3675 September 24, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
May 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 17, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 10, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 10, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 22, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 28, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 29, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12760567
VEHICLE DOOR ASSEMBLY AND VEHICLE
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12735922
Handle Assembly
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735915
ELECTRIC LOCK AND CLUTCH MECHANISM THEREOF
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12723449
Actuating Mechanism for Actuating Covers for Vehicles
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12723433
LOCKSET INDICATOR ASSEMBLIES
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+13.6%)
3y 0m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1277 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month