Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/410,494

FORKLIFT AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING FORKLIFT

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 11, 2024
Examiner
KEENAN, JAMES W
Art Unit
3655
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha Toyota Jidoshokki
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 12m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
753 granted / 1130 resolved
+14.6% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 12m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1166
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
64.9%
+24.9% vs TC avg
§102
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
§112
18.8%
-21.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1130 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1, lines 21 and 24, and claim 4, lines 12 and 15, absent any spatial relationship being set forth, it is unclear what is meant by and relative to what the recitations “forward” and “rearward” refer. It is assumed this was intended to refer to a direction of travel of the forklift, but this should be clarified. Claims 1-4 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the closest prior art is JP 2022-174514, which discloses a forklift having a fork with an insertion portion for insertion into an insertion opening of a pallet, a tilt cylinder, a lift cylinder, a pressure sensor to detect an internal pressure of the lift cylinder, and processing circuitry that executes a process of lowering the fork, next tilting the fork forward, and then pulling out the insertion portion from the insertion opening of the pallet, generally as set forth in claims 1 and 4, but does not further disclose a contact sensor for detecting if the insertion portion is in contact with a first (upper) defining surface of the insertion opening, wherein lowering the fork involves determining that the insertion portion has separated from the first defining surface, and wherein the process further involves tilting the fork rearward after tilting the fork forward. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Myers discloses a fork leveling system to ensure a fork insertion portion of a fork can be properly inserted into an insertion opening of a pallet. Koide and Kato each disclose a forklift and method of control thereof, generally similar to that of applicant, but lack a pressure sensor. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to James Keenan whose telephone number is (571)272-6925. The examiner can normally be reached Mon. - Thurs. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ernesto Suarez can be reached at 571-270-5565. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /James Keenan/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 3652 2/17/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 11, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601197
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR MANAGING THE STORAGE, PARKING, OR DELIVERY OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12576770
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUSES FOR LOADING, SHIFTING, AND STAGING OBJECTS IN AUTOMATED OR SEMI-AUTOMATED FASHION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12570464
REFUSE VEHICLE WITH FRAME RAIL SERVICE LIFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565134
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUSES FOR LOADING, SHIFTING, AND STAGING OBJECTS IN AUTOMATED OR SEMI-AUTOMATED FASHION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12545510
AUTOMATED STORAGE SYSTEMS, AND DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+25.2%)
2y 12m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1130 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month