Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/411,036

DOOR-TRIGGERED TIRE PRESSURE DETECTION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR WAKING UP THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 12, 2024
Examiner
KIRKLAND III, FREDDIE
Art Unit
2855
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sysgration Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
958 granted / 1132 resolved
+16.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1166
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§103
34.2%
-5.8% vs TC avg
§102
40.4%
+0.4% vs TC avg
§112
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1132 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
FIRST NON-FINAL REJECTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings Figures 4 and 5 should be designated by a legend such as --Prior Art-- because only that which is old is illustrated. See MPEP § 608.02(g). Corrected drawings in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. The replacement sheet(s) should be labeled “Replacement Sheet” in the page header (as per 37 CFR 1.84(c)) so as not to obstruct any portion of the drawing figures. If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Objections Claim 5 recites the limitation "the matched TPMS" in line 5 of the claim. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 5 recites the limitation "the TPMS main control unit" in line 6 of the claim. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Van Wiemeersch et al. U.S. Patent Application Publication 2019/0225034 in view of Katou U.S. Patent Application Publication 2011/0153120. With respect to clams 1 and 5, Van Wiemeersch teaches a car door-triggered tire pressure detection system (figure 1) comprising: an on-board unit including an ECU unit electrically connected to a main high-frequency transceiver module (on-board computing unit 402 connected to high frequency communications module 120, paragraphs 27, 52, and 53, figure 4), a main display (display 418), and a door sensing module (door ajar sensor 110), and multiple TPMS each including a TPMS main control unit electrically connected to a TPMS high-frequency transceiver module (TPMS sensors 118 each having a high frequency antenna, paragraphs 27-28), each TPMS high-frequency transceiver module matching with the main high-frequency transceiver module through high-frequency wireless signals (paragraphs 27-28), when the door sensing module detects an opening of a car door, the main display displays tire pressure values returned by each TPMS (a door open pre-driving event triggers the TPMS sensors to collect tire pressures display a tire pressure to a user, paragraphs, 36 38, 44, figure 5). Van Wiemeersch fails to teach the on-board unit excluding a vehicle low-frequency circuit and a vehicle low-frequency antenna and each TPMS excluding a TPMS low-frequency circuit and a TPMS low-frequency antenna Katou teaches a tire condition monitoring apparatus (abstract) having a vehicle 1, four sensor units 3 attached to the four wheels 5 of the vehicle 1, and a control unit 4 mounted on the body of the vehicle 1 (paragraph 33, figure 1), and where each sensor unit 3 includes a pressure sensor 21, a temperature sensor 22, a sensor unit controller 23, an RF transmission circuit 24, and an RF reception circuit 25 (paragraph 39). The pressure sensor 21 measures the internal air pressure of the corresponding tire 6, outputs the air pressure data obtained by the measurement to the sensor unit controller 23 (paragraph 40), and the sensor unit controller 23 generates a tire condition data signal that contains air pressure data, temperature data, and an ID code, and sends the tire condition data signal to the RF transmission circuit 24 (paragraph 41). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the system of Van Wiemeersch and only use high frequency antennas as taught by Katou in order to provide a tire condition monitoring apparatus, while simplifying the structure and reducing costs (Katou, paragraph 7). With respect to claims 2, 3, 6, and 7, Van Wiemeersch teaches wherein signal transmission methods of the main high-frequency transceiver module and the TPMS high-frequency transceiver module are BLE (Bluetooth low energy), OOK (on-off keying), RFID (radio frequency identification), WI-FI, UWB (ultra-wideband), Zigbee (zonal intercommunication global standard), LPWAN (low-power wide-area network) (the communications module 120 includes Bluetooth communications and UWB communications, paragraphs 27-28), and wherein the main high-frequency transceiver module comprises a main high-frequency antenna and a main high-frequency RF unit (interpreted as the Bluetooth and UWB communications), the TPMS high-frequency transceiver module comprises a TPMS high-frequency antenna and a TPMS high-frequency RF unit (the TPMS has the corresponding communications, paragraphs 34-35). With respect to claims 4 and 8, Van Wiemeersch teaches wherein the main high-frequency transceiver module matches with a car key using high-frequency signals (The communication module 120 includes hardware and firmware to establish a wireless connection with the mobile device 122 that may also function as a key, paragraph 28), the car key includes a car key display, when the main display displays the tire pressure values returned by each TPMS, the car key display synchronously displays the same tire pressure values (the TPMS controller 130 sends a signal to the mobile device 122 of the user 124, via the communication module 120, to present the tire pressure measurement(s) and/or low-pressure alert to the user 124 via the mobile device 122, paragraph 44). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FREDDIE KIRKLAND III whose telephone number is (571)272-2232. The examiner can normally be reached 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John Breene can be reached at (571) 272-4107. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. FREDDIE KIRKLAND III Primary Examiner Art Unit 2855 /Freddie Kirkland III/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855 1/22/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 12, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594549
PLUNGER ROD AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SUCH A PLUNGER ROD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590868
ADJUSTABLE TEST OBJECT HOLDER FOR A DRIVE TRAIN, TEST BENCH, AND DRIVE TRAIN TEST BENCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584836
INSTRUMENTED PENDULUM FOR MINIATURIZED CHARPY IMPACT TEST AND CHARPY IMPACT MACHINE COMPRISING THE INSTRUMENTED PENDULUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583129
TORQUE SENSOR AND ROBOT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584592
A system for checking the functionality of a pressure relief valve
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+10.6%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1132 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month