Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/412,991

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING IMAGES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 15, 2024
Examiner
SHAH, UTPAL D
Art Unit
2668
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Zhejiang Dahua Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
652 granted / 743 resolved
+25.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
759
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.1%
-27.9% vs TC avg
§103
30.2%
-9.8% vs TC avg
§102
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
§112
14.4%
-25.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 743 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 9, 10, 11, 18, 19 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US PgPub. No. 2020/0134772 by Poudel Karmatha et al. (hereinafter ‘Poudel’). In regards to claim 1, Poudel teaches a system for processing an image, comprising: at least one storage device including a set of instructions; and at least one processor configured to communicate with the at least one storage device, wherein when executing the set of instructions, the at least one processor is configured to direct the system to perform operations including: (See Poudel Figure 1, Poudel teaches a system for image processing.) obtaining an image; (See Poudel paragraph [0070], Poudel teaches camera for capturing images of a scene.) obtaining a first image feature by performing a feature extraction operation on the image; (See Poudel paragraph [0071] and Figure 2, element S207, Poudel teaches obtaining features from full resolution images.) obtaining a down-sampled image by down-sampling the image; obtaining a second image feature by performing a feature extraction operation on the down-sampled image; (See Poudel paragraphs [0073], [0077]-[0078] and Figure 3, element S303 and S305, Poudel teaches downsampling the image and obtaining features from downsampled image.) obtaining, based on the first image feature and the second image feature, a target feature; and performing a segmentation operation on the image based on the target feature. (See Poudel paragraphs [0131] and Figure 3, element S319, Poudel teaches fusing features and obtaining a segmented 2D image.) In regards to claim 2, Poudel teaches wherein the obtaining a target feature comprises: obtaining a first intermediate feature by up-sampling the first image feature; obtaining a second intermediate feature by up-sampling the second image feature; obtaining a semantic feature by performing a fusion operation on the first intermediate feature and the second intermediate feature; and obtaining the target feature based on the semantic feature. (See Poudel paragraphs [0037]-[0039]). In regards to claim 9, Poudel teaches wherein the obtaining, based on the first image feature and the second image feature, a target feature further comprises: obtaining a difference feature based on the first image feature and the second image feature; obtaining a basic feature based on the image; and obtaining the target feature by performing an enhancement operation on the first image feature based on the basic feature and the difference feature. (See Poudel paragraphs [0131]-[0135]). Claims 10-11 recite limitations that are similar to that of claims 1 and 2, respectively. Therefore, claims 10-11 are rejected similarly as claims 1 and 2, respectively. Claim 18 recites limitations that are similar to that of claim 9. Therefore, claim18 is rejected similarly as claim 9. Claims 19-20 recite limitations that are similar to that of claims 1 and 2, respectively. Therefore, claims 19-20 are rejected similarly as claims 1 and 2, respectively. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-8 and 12-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: In regards to claims 3 and 12, the applied art does not teach or suggest “wherein the obtaining a semantic feature by performing a fusion operation on the first intermediate feature and the second intermediate feature comprises: obtaining a first probability map corresponding to the first intermediate feature and a second probability map corresponding to the second intermediate feature; and obtaining the semantic feature by performing a weighted summation on the first intermediate feature and the second intermediate feature based on the first probability map and the second probability map.” In regards to claims 4-8 and 13-17, the applied art does not teach or suggest “wherein the obtaining the target feature based on the semantic feature comprises: obtaining a difference feature based on the first intermediate feature and the second intermediate feature; and obtaining the target feature based on the difference feature and the semantic feature.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to UTPAL D SHAH whose telephone number is (571)272-5729. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 7:30-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vu Le can be reached at (571) 272-7332. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /UTPAL D SHAH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2668
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 15, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602948
Generating Computer Augmented Maps from Physical Maps
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602914
PROVIDING USER GUIDANCE TO USE AND TRAIN A GENERATIVE ADVERSARIAL NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597242
DETERMINING EMITTER IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION TO A DESIRED ACCURACY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597088
QUALITY FACTOR USING RECONSTRUCTED IMAGES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597151
SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO DETERMINE VEGETATION ENCROACHMENT ALONG A RIGHT-OF-WAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+11.4%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 743 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month