Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/413,198

COMPUTER SYSTEM, A COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD AND A VEHICLE COMPRISING THE COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING PRESSURE RELEASE IN A LIQUID GAS FUEL VOLUME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 16, 2024
Examiner
SAAVEDRA, EMILIO J
Art Unit
2117
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Volvo Truck Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
345 granted / 498 resolved
+14.3% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
542
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
§103
47.8%
+7.8% vs TC avg
§102
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
§112
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 498 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is a response to an application filed 01/16/2024, in which claims 1-8 are pending and ready for examination. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Information Disclosure Statement The Examiner has considered the references listed on the Information Disclosure Statement submitted on 01/16/2024. Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they do not include the following reference sign(s) mentioned in the description: Reference no. S5 in paragraph 35 of the instant specification, in relation to Fig 2. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Examiner Notes Examiner cites particular columns and line numbers in the references as applied to the claims below for the convenience of the applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings in the art and are applied to the specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. It is respectfully requested that, in preparing responses, the applicant fully consider the references in entirety as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US Patent Publication No. 2022/0219667 to Dudar (hereinafter Dudar) Regarding claim 1, Dudar discloses a computer system comprising a processor device for controlling pressure release in a liquid gas fuel volume of a vehicle (Controller controls vehicle fuel system with sensor feedback, including consideration/analysis of fuel vapor amount and purging, see p23, 41, 45, p2, Dudar), the vehicle comprising a liquid gas fuel volume (An amount of fuel and vapor considered, see p49, p56, 45, Dudar), a valve controllable to ventilate a volume of fuel gas into ambient surroundings of the vehicle (Vapors can be purged to atmosphere, with valves used to direct or impede flow of vapors, see p48, p66, p74, Dudar), a sensor assembly (sensor feedback, see p23, 41, 45, Duda) and a navigational system (GPS on vehicle, where GPS is a known navigation system, p48, p64, p4, see Duda), the processor device being configured to: - identify the vehicle approaching a confined space (A vehicle’s destination is determined that includes a confined to a space, such as a parked space, p64-65, p48, p4, 47, see Duda), - measure by the sensor assembly a status of the liquid gas fuel volume (Sensor feedback includes fuel amount determination, p61-62, p26, 41, p23, see Duda), - based on the measured status of the liquid gas fuel volume and on historical data, estimate an amount of fuel gas that would be released while the vehicle is located in the confined space (The amount of vapor that would be released during an estimated time confined in a parking space is determined and can be analyzed in view of historical vehicle route and sensed data, see p65, p64, p61-62, p26, 41, p23, see Duda), and - controlling the valve to preemptively ventilate at least the estimated amount of fuel gas from the liquid gas fuel volume before reaching the confined space (Valve is used in view of purging vapor reaching a maximum amount of vapor, see p65-66, p4, 61-p65, p64, p61-62, p26, 41, p23, see Duda). Claim 2 is rejected on the same grounds as claim 1. Regarding claim 3, Duda discloses all the limitations of the base claim as outlined above, and are analyzed as previously discussed with regard to that claim. Duda further discloses further comprising continuously or intermittently collecting data on a group of confined spaces, and wherein the confined space that the vehicle is approaching is comprised in the group of confined spaces (Past drive cycles are considered to a destination that includes at least a group that comprises at least a space to which a vehicle will be confined for a period of time, meaning there is at least an intermittent collection of data, and using this data determine a route approaching a destination to at least the confining parking space that conform a group of at least one confined space, see p64, p47-48, Duda). Regarding claim 4, Duda discloses all the limitations of the base claim as outlined above, and are analyzed as previously discussed with regard to that claim. Duda further discloses wherein the data on confined spaces relate to one or more of: type of confined space, ambient temperature, ambient pressure, location and/or time spent by the vehicle in the confined space (Data on past drive cycles and travel logs can relate at least to a confined space of a parking space type, location, parking duration, temperature, see p64-65, p45, p47-48, 51, 53, Duda). Regarding claim 5, Duda discloses all the limitations of the base claim as outlined above, and are analyzed as previously discussed with regard to that claim. Duda further discloses wherein the data on confined spaces is collected by the sensor assembly, by a Global Positioning System/Global Navigation Satellite System (GPS/GNSS), by communication with a remote database, and/or by collection of navigational data from the navigational system (Data collected to a destination by GPS and navigation, see p64, p4, p48, Duda). Regarding claim 6, Duda discloses all the limitations of the base claim as outlined above, and are analyzed as previously discussed with regard to that claim. Duda further discloses further comprising storing the collected data on confined spaces as historical data (Drive cycles to a destination are stored in databases to produce past cycle data, thus constituting historical data, see p64, p66, p60, p49, p47-48, Duda). Regarding claim 7, Duda discloses all the limitations of the base claim as outlined above, and are analyzed as previously discussed with regard to that claim. Duda further discloses wherein measuring the status of the liquid gas fuel volume comprises measuring one or more of: a temperature of the liquid fuel gas volume, a pressure of the liquid fuel gas volume, an ambient pressure and/or an ambient temperature (Measurements can include fuel pressure, emperature, , see p61-62, p26, 41, p23, Duda). Claim 8 is rejected on the same grounds as claim 1. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Fukui at al., US. Patent Publication No. 2013/0081600 teaches releasing fuel vapors to the atmosphere when a canister capacity is exceeded, and purging fuel vapors during idling stop. Dudar, US. Patent Publication No. 2020/0032746 teaches a valve adjusting vapors to the atmosphere. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EMILIO J SAAVEDRA whose telephone number is (571)270-5617. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9:30am-5:30pm (EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert E Fennema can be reached at (571) 272-2748. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EMILIO J SAAVEDRA/Primary Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2117
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 16, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12586082
HYBRID SYSTEM AND METHOD OF CARBON AND ENERGY MANAGEMENTS FOR GREEN INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580382
METHOD FOR DETECTING A POWER LOSS WHEN OPERATING A WIND POWER INSTALLATION OR A WIND FARM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12572764
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR AEROSOL DELIVERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568895
Irrigation Control Systems and Methods
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12554950
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR AEROSOL DELIVERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+25.8%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 498 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month