Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/413,502

Method of Producing Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Infrared Absorbing Particles and Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Infrared Absorbing Particles

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 16, 2024
Examiner
AHVAZI, BIJAN
Art Unit
1763
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd.
OA Round
7 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
7-8
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allow Rate
754 granted / 1191 resolved
-1.7% vs TC avg
Strong +46% interview lift
Without
With
+46.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
82 currently pending
Career history
1273
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
44.3%
+4.3% vs TC avg
§102
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
§112
21.7%
-18.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1191 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 2. A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 02/02/2026 has been entered. 3. Claims 1-3 are pending. Claims 1-3 are under examination on the merits. Claim 4 is previously cancelled. 4. The objections and rejections not addressed below are deemed withdrawn. Information Disclosure Statement 5. The information disclosure statement submitted on 02/02/2026 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the examiner has considered the information disclosure statement. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 6. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 7. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Okada et al. (US Pub. No. 2015/0301243 A1, hereinafter “Okada”) in view of Yutaka Kurabayashi (US Pub. No. 2002/0006982 A1, hereinafter “’982”), and Ding et al. (Preparation and characterization of encapsulated C.I. pigment yellow 12 via ball-milling and mini-emulsion polymerization, Progress in Organic Coatings 117 (2018) 69-75, hereinafter, “Ding”). Regarding claim 1: Okada teaches organic-inorganic hybrid infrared absorbing particles such as a near-infrared absorption filter including composite tungsten oxide particles expressed by a general formula NayWOz, satisfying 0.3≦y≦1.1, 2.2≦z≦3.0 as near-infrared shielding particles (Page 1, [0011]), and a dispersant covering at least a portion of a surface of the infrared absorbing particles (Page 4, [0061]), and wherein the dispersant is disposed on surfaces of the infrared absorbing particles, the coating resin is disposed on the dispersant (Page 5, [0094], Example 1), wherein the coating resin is a photocurable resin, and wherein the photocurable resin is cured by irradiation with ultraviolet light (Page 5, [0094], Example 1). Okada does not expressly teach i) a dispersant comprising a copolymer comprising styrene units and tertiary amine units, and ii) the coating resin is obtained by polymerization within stabilized mini-emulsion droplets, wherein the organic-inorganic hybrid infrared absorbing particles have a spherical shape. Referring to i), however Kurabayashi teaches an organic-inorganic hybrid infrared absorbing particles as a dispersion of a resin encapsulating a coloring material (Page 15, [0239]) comprising, infrared absorbing particles such as carbon black MCF-88, a coating resin such as styrene-N,N-dimethylamino- ethyl methacrylate copolymer (i.e., a dispersant, molecular weight: 45,000) encapsulating the carbon black, wherein the dispersant comprising a copolymer (Page 15, [0241], Example 19), comprising styrene units (Page 4, [0071]), and tertiary amine units (Page 5, [0072]), wherein the dispersant coating is obtained by polymerization within stabilized mini- emulsion droplets (Page 4, [0070]), and wherein the organic-inorganic hybrid infrared absorbing particles have a spherical shape such as microcapsule (Page 3, [0056]; Page 4, [0068]; Page 6, [0096]) with benefit of providing an ink which can provide an image high in optical density and excellent in rub-off resistance, water fastness and resistance to line marker, and exhibits excellent ejection stability from a recording head when used in ink-jet recording (Page 2, [0012]-[0013]). PNG media_image1.png 228 378 media_image1.png Greyscale Referring to ii), Ding teaches the encapsulate aqueous dispersion of nanoscale C.I. Pigment Yellow 12 (PY12) with styrene-butyl acrylate P(St-co-BA) resin via mini-emulsion polymerization, the PY12 dispersion was prepared through ball milling in the presence of dispersing agent (Page 69, Abstract, lines 1-3; Page 71, Fig. 2), wherein the morphology of encapsulated PY12 nanosphere are spherical with a clear core-shell structure (Page 71, left Col., 3. Results and discussion, lines 1-8; Page 72, Fig. 3) with benefit of providing composite particles exhibit a clear core-shell structure, the particle size uniformity and encapsulation integrity of encapsulated particles prepared by ultrasonic dispersion are superior to those prepared by high-speed shear dispersion and the UV-resistance ability and color stability of encapsulated PY12 are better than those of the original pigment (Page 69, Abstract, lines 10-13), PNG media_image2.png 462 952 media_image2.png Greyscale In an analogous art of the organic-inorganic hybrid infrared absorbing particles, and in the light of such benefit before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify the dispersant of the infrared absorbing particle by Okada, so as to include a dispersant comprising a copolymer of styrene and a tertiary amine as taught by Kurabayashi, and would have been motivated to do so with reasonable expectation that this would result in providing a copolymer having monomer units containing a tertiary amine, results in novel salt modified dispersants which show better dispersing performance and development properties compared with the conventional salt formed dispersant as suggested by Kurabayashi (Page 2, [0012]-[0013]). It is submitted that a styrene-N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate copolymer acts as a dispersant by utilizing its amphiphilic structure to provide steric and electrostatic stabilization to particles in a liquid medium. The polymer attaches to the particle surfaces, preventing re-agglomeration and maintaining a stable, homogeneous dispersion. In an analogous art of the organic-inorganic hybrid infrared absorbing particles, and in the light of such benefit before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify the coating of dispersant of the infrared absorbing particle by Okada, so as to include a coating resin disposed on the dispersant, which is obtained by polymerization within stabilized mini-emulsion droplets, wherein the organic-inorganic hybrid infrared absorbing particles have a spherical shape as taught by Ding, and would have been motivated to do so with reasonable expectation that this would result in providing composite particles exhibit a clear core-shell structure, the particle size uniformity and encapsulation integrity of encapsulated particles prepared by ultrasonic dispersion are superior to those prepared by high-speed shear dispersion and the UV-resistance ability and color stability of encapsulated PY12 are better than those of the original pigment as suggested by Ding (Page 69, Abstract, lines 10-13). Regarding claim 2: The disclosure Okada in view of Kurabayashi and Ding is adequately set forth in paragraph above and is incorporated herein by reference. Okada teaches the coating resin for example, UV-curable resin, thermosetting resin, electron beam-curable resin, cold-setting resin, or thermoplastic resin can be suitably selected according to a purpose of use. Specifically, polyethylene resin, polyvinyl chloride resin, polyvinylidene chloride resin, polyvinyl alcohol resin, polystyrene resin, polypropylene resin, ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer, polyester resin, polyethylene terephthalate resin, fluorine resin, polycarbonate resin, acrylic resin, polyvinyl butyral resin, etc., can be given. These resins may be used alone or may be used in combination (Page 4, [0078]) Ding teaches styrene-butyl acrylate P(St-co-BA) resin via mini-emulsion polymerization, the PY12 dispersion was prepared through ball milling in the presence of dispersing agent (Page 69, Abstract, lines 1-3; Page 71, Fig. 2). Regarding claim 3: The disclosure Okada in view of Kurabayashi and Ding is adequately set forth in paragraph above and is incorporated herein by reference. Okada teaches a near-infrared absorption filter including composite tungsten oxide particles expressed by a general formula NayWOz, satisfying 0.3≦y≦1.1, 2.2≦z≦3.0 as near-infrared shielding particles (Page 1, [0011]), and a dispersant covering at least a portion of a surface of the infrared absorbing particles (Page 4, [0061]), wherein the coating resin is a photocurable resin, and wherein the photocurable resin is cured by irradiation with ultraviolet light (Page 5, [0094], Example 1). Response to Arguments 8. Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-3 have not been filed, thus claims 1-3 stand rejected as set forth in Office action dated 01/28/2026. Examiner Information 9. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Bijan Ahvazi, Ph.D. whose telephone number is (571) 270-3449. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri 9.00 A.M. -7 P.M.. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Del Sole can be reached on 571-272-1130. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Bijan Ahvazi/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1763 02/06/2026 bijan.ahvazi@uspto.gov
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 16, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 20, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 16, 2024
Response Filed
Feb 10, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Apr 10, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 11, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 07, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 16, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Sep 05, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 07, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 10, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 08, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 12, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 07, 2026
Response Filed
Jan 25, 2026
Final Rejection — §103
Feb 02, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595408
PHOTOCHROMIC COMPOUND, NAPHTHOL DERIVATIVE, CURABLE COMPOSITION, OPTICAL ARTICLE, LENS, AND EYEGLASSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12577144
GLASS MATERIAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577455
PHOTOCHROMIC COMPOUND, PHOTOCHROMIC COMPOSITION, PHOTOCHROMIC ARTICLE AND SPECTACLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12570894
PHOTOCHROMIC COMPOUND AND CURABLE COMPOSITION CONTAINING THE PHOTOCHROMIC COMPOUND
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12571950
WAVELENGTH SELECTIVE ABSORPTION FILTER, POLARIZING PLATE, ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT DISPLAY DEVICE, AND LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+46.5%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1191 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month