Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 18/413,835

GEOFENCING CONTROL MODES FOR A COOKING APPLIANCE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 16, 2024
Examiner
BASICHAS, ALFRED
Art Unit
3762
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Haier US Appliance Solutions Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
902 granted / 1251 resolved
+2.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1262
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
71.9%
+31.9% vs TC avg
§102
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
§112
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1251 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election with traverse of Invention I and Species I in the reply filed on 6/10/26 is acknowledged. As regards applicant’s traversal of the restriction, Applicant asserts that the method and apparatus claims recite the same scope of invention. Accordingly, the restriction is withdrawn. As regards applicant’s traversal of the election of species, Applicant asserts that claims 1 and 12 are generic and thereby their allowance would negate the need for the election of species. After detailed examination and in view of applicant’s arguments, the election of species is withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Cadima (US 10,830,450), which shows all of the claimed limitations. Cadima shows: 1. (Original) A method of operating a cooking appliance 100, the method comprising: enabling a geofencing mode 268 defining a geofence condition 310 (fig. 1,11 - temperature setting); determining a status of the geo fence condition 330; and implementing a responsive action based on the determined status of the geofence condition 340,350. 12. (Withdrawn - Currently Amended) A cooking appliance defining a vertical direction, a lateral direction, and a transverse direction, the cooking appliance comprising: a cooktop 100 comprising one or more heating elements 104; a user interface panel 110 mounted to the cooktop for facilitating user interaction with the cooking appliance (fig. 1); and a controller 268 in operative communication with the user interface panel, the controller being configured for the controller be configured to execute operations (fig. 1) comprising: enabling a geofencing mode defining a geofence condition; determining a status of the geofence condition; and implementing a responsive action based on the determined status of the geofence condition (see previous claim). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-11 and 13-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Plos (US 2025/0150299) teaches detecting a user’s position inside or outside an area/boundary, but fails to recite the user list as recited in the claims. Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. These references disclose devices with many of the claimed components. Nevertheless, in order to avoid overburdening the applicant with redundant rejections, these references were not applied. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALFRED BASICHAS whose telephone number is 571 272 4871. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday through Friday during regular business hours. To contact the examiner’s supervisor please call MICHAEL HOANG whose telephone number is 571 272 6460. Any inquiry of a general nature or relating to the status of this application or proceeding should be directed to the Tech Center telephone number is 571 272 3700. June 17, 2026 /ALFRED BASICHAS/Primary Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3762
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12667225
IGNITOR MOUNTING BRACKETS FOR PELLET GRILLS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12655990
COOKING EQUIPMENT
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12653195
PORTABLE MOTORIZED HIGH TEMPERATURE PIZZA OVEN
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12653341
CHARCOAL BARBECUE HAVING AN INTEGRATED COAL STARTER
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12650230
SECTIONAL MOUNTING SYSTEM FOR AN ASSEMBLY THAT IS CONVERTIBLE BETWEEN A FIRE PIT, GRILL, GRIDDLE, SMOKER AND/OR TABLE
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+3.8%)
2y 9m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1251 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month