Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/414,228

PRESSURE-VOLUME-TEMPERATURE (PVT) SYSTEM FOR RESERVOIR FLUID CHARACTERIZATION

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jan 16, 2024
Examiner
TCHATCHOUANG, CARL F.R.
Art Unit
2858
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Saudi Arabian Oil Company
OA Round
2 (Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
149 granted / 180 resolved
+14.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
207
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
30.1%
-9.9% vs TC avg
§103
37.5%
-2.5% vs TC avg
§102
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
§112
21.9%
-18.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 180 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Claims 1-14 are pending Claims 1 and 7 have been amended Claims 13 and 14 are new Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 6-11, filed 7/30/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-12 under U.S.C. 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of newly found prior art. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 2, 5-8, 11 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Okechukwu; Egbukole et al. (US Publication #US 20240310263 A1; hereinafter Okechukwu; newly cited) in view of Harrison; Christopher et al. (US 20160040533 A1; hereinafter Harrison; newly cited). Regarding claim 1, Okechukwu teaches A pressure-volume-temperature (PVT) system (fig.4 #400) for characterization of a reservoir fluid (par.50 “a pressure-volume-temperature (PVT) electromagnetic viscometer (EMV) system and methods of use for the system to determine the viscosity of a reservoir fluid sample over a variety of temperatures and pressures, including pressures below the bubble point pressure of the fluid.”), comprising: a temperature control unit (par.51 “The temperature control chamber (402) includes a temperature system (404); the temperature system (404) includes a heating device, such as an air heater or a heating element, to heat the air and components within the temperature control chamber (402) to a desired temperature.”); a sample cell disposed inside the temperature control unit (fig.4 and par.52 “the PVT EMV system (400) may further include a sample preparation cell (406)”) for accommodating the reservoir fluid (par.52 “the sample preparation cell (406), the EMV (408), and any fluid they may contain will, under steady state conditions, be at the internal temperature of the temperature control chamber (402).”), wherein the temperature control unit comprises a housing (fig.4 shows housing of temperature control chamber 402) and an interior chamber defined by a space between the sample cell and the housing (fig.4 shows chamber 402 comprising a layer which defines an interior chamber as a space between the sample cell and the housing); and a fluid supply unit (fig.3 #410) that provides a temperature control fluid to the interior chamber (par.53 teaches reservoir fluid acting as a temperature control fluid;), such that the sample cell is immersed in the temperature control fluid (fig.4 shows valve 414 located above sample cell 406; it is evident the reservoir fluid, acting as the temperature control fluid, coming from this valve will completely immerse sample cell 406 ), to control a temperature of the sample cell (par.53; because the sample cell 406 is heated at a set temperature, the temperature difference between the reservoir fluid and the heated cell will reach an equilibrium point; thus the reservoir fluid acts as a temperature control fluid); wherein the fluid supply unit includes a first container (#408 is another fluid supply unit comprising a container due to the fluid supply line 424) providing a first fluid having a first temperature as the temperature control fluid (par.52 “Because the sample preparation cell (406) and the EMV (408) are disposed within the temperature control chamber (402), the sample preparation cell (406), the EMV (408), and any fluid they may contain will, under steady state conditions, be at the internal temperature of the temperature control chamber (402).”) for a first stage of PVT analysis (post-test is interpreted as the 1st stage of PVT analysis) and Okechukwu fails to teach a second fluid having a second temperature that is different from the first fluid as the temperature control fluid for a second stage for PVT analysis. Harrison does teach a second fluid (par.99 and fig.15 teaches water as second fluid) having a second temperature that is different from the first fluid as the temperature control fluid (fig.15 inherently teaches water within pump 113 having different temperature as sample within 103 and 104, because they are heated at a uniform temperature within 101) for a second stage for PVT analysis (par.110 teaches depressurization stage as second stage for PVT analysis). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Okechukwu to include the teachings of Harrison; which would provide the optical intensity of the phase transition cell to be monitored during the depressurization stage through the use of optical measurements as disclosed by Harrison (par.51). Regarding claim 2, Okechukwu in view of Harrison teaches the PVT system of claim 1, Okechukwu further teaches further comprising a piston (par.98 teaches piston 114) arranged in the sample cell and configured to control a pressure inside the sample cell (par.39 “the pressure control may raise or lower the fluid pressure via motion of the piston thereby reducing or enlarging the volume available to the fluid.”). Regarding claim 5, Okechukwu in view of Harrison teaches the PVT system of claim 1, Okechukwu further teaches wherein the reservoir fluid is characterized in the sample cell under steady state conditions (par.59 “sufficient time is allowed for the fluid in the sample preparation cell (406) to reach steady state conditions.”) to obtain a property of the reservoir fluid (par.50 “to determine the viscosity of a reservoir fluid sample over a variety of temperatures and pressures, including pressures below the bubble point pressure of the fluid.”). Regarding claim 6, Okechukwu in view of Harrison teaches the PVT system of claim 5, Okechukwu further teaches wherein further comprising a controller (par.57 teaches controller 434) that processes data obtained from the sample cell (par.57 “the controller (434) can receive, process, and record signals generated by the temperature system (404), sample preparation cell (406), EMV (408), constant displacement pump (418), and vacuum pump (428).”) to determine the property of the reservoir fluid for use in a reservoir model (par.64 “the viscosity measurements may inform a subsurface model or reservoir simulator.”). Regarding claim 7, Okechukwu teaches A method for performing a pressure-volume-temperature (PVT) analysis (abstract), comprising: collecting a reservoir fluid from a reservoir (par.53 “The reservoir fluid may be acquired from a wellbore, a fracture in a formation, a body of water or oil or mixture of materials, or other void in a subterranean formation that is large enough from which to collect a sample.”); performing PVT analysis on the reservoir fluid using a sample cell (par.53 teaches sample cell 406) disposed in a temperature control unit (par.53 “temperature control chamber (402)”); controlling a temperature of the sample cell (par.51 “The temperature control chamber (402) includes a temperature system (404); the temperature system (404) includes a heating device, such as an air heater or a heating element, to heat the air and components within the temperature control chamber (402) to a desired temperature.”) using a temperature control fluid (par.53 teaches reservoir fluid acting as a temperature control fluid;) in an interior chamber defined by a space between the sample cell and a housing of the temperature control unit (fig.4 shows chamber 402 comprising a layer which defines an interior chamber as a space between the sample cell and the housing), wherein the sample cell is immersed in the temperature control fluid (fig.4 shows valve 414 located above sample cell 406; it is evident the reservoir fluid, acting as the temperature control fluid, coming from this valve will completely immerse sample cell 406 ); providing, for a first stage of the PVT analysis (fig.5 steps 502, 504, 506, 508 and 510 constitute a first stage of the PVT analysis), a first fluid having a first temperature as the temperature control fluid (par.52 “Because the sample preparation cell (406) and the EMV (408) are disposed within the temperature control chamber (402), the sample preparation cell (406), the EMV (408), and any fluid they may contain will, under steady state conditions, be at the internal temperature of the temperature control chamber (402).”), and Okechukwu fails to teach providing, for a second stage of the PVT analysis, a second fluid having a second temperature that is different from the first temperature as the temperature control fluid. Harrison does teach providing, for a second stage of the PVT analysis (par.110 teaches depressurization stage as second stage for PVT analysis), a second fluid (par.99 and fig.15 teaches water as second fluid) having a second temperature that is different from the first temperature as the temperature control fluid (fig.15 inherently teaches water within pump 113 having different temperature as sample within 103 and 104, because they are heated at a uniform temperature within 101). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Okechukwu to include the teachings of Harrison; which would provide the optical intensity of the phase transition cell to be monitored during the depressurization stage through the use of optical measurements as disclosed by Harrison (par.51). Regarding claim 8, Okechukwu in view of Harrison teaches the method of claim 7, Okechukwu further teaches further comprising controlling a pressure inside the sample cell (par.39 “the pressure control may raise or lower the fluid pressure via motion of the piston thereby reducing or enlarging the volume available to the fluid.”) by a piston arranged in the sample cell (par.98 teaches piston 114). Regarding claim 11, Okechukwu in view of Harrison teaches the method of claim 7, Okechukwu further teaches further comprising determining a property of the reservoir fluid by characterizing the reservoir fluid (par.50 “to determine the viscosity of a reservoir fluid sample over a variety of temperatures and pressures, including pressures below the bubble point pressure of the fluid.”) in the sample cell under steady state conditions (par.59 “sufficient time is allowed for the fluid in the sample preparation cell (406) to reach steady state conditions.”). Regarding claim 12, Okechukwu in view of Harrison teaches the method of claim 11, Okechukwu further teaches further comprising processing data obtained cell (par.57 “the controller (434) can receive, process, and record signals generated by the temperature system (404), sample preparation cell (406), EMV (408), constant displacement pump (418), and vacuum pump (428).”) from the sample cell to determine the property of the reservoir fluid for use in a reservoir model (par.64 “the viscosity measurements may inform a subsurface model or reservoir simulator.”). Claim(s) 3, 4, 9 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Okechukwu in view of Harrison further in view of Winkler, Gary et al. (US Publication #US 20020020179 A1; hereinafter Winkler; previously cited). Regarding claim 3, Okechukwu in view of Harrison teaches the PVT system of claim 1, but fails to teach wherein the first container is configured to preheat the first fluid to the first temperature before the first stage and preheat the second fluid to the second temperature before the second stage. Winkler does teach wherein the first container is configured to preheat the first fluid to the first temperature before the first stage (par.17 teaches cold reservoir containing a chiller, which maintains temperature by controlling heat (which involves preheating)) and preheat the second fluid to the second temperature before the second stage (Par.19 teaches hot reservoir containing heater which maintains temperature by controlling heat (which involves preheating)). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Okechukwu in view of Harrison to include the teachings of Winkler; which would provide an invention includes a pair of two-way valves to control the mixing of fluid from a hot and a cold reservoir to produce the final precisely-controlled fluid stream delivered to the point of usage as disclosed by Winkler (par.8). Regarding claim 4, Okechukwu in view of Harrison teaches the PVT system of claim 1, but fails to teach wherein the second fluid replaces the first fluid in the interior chamber after the first stage, such that a temperature in the interior chamber changes from the first temperature to the second temperature after replacement. Winkler does teach wherein the second fluid replaces the first fluid in the interior chamber after the first stage, such that a temperature in the interior chamber changes from the first temperature to the second temperature after replacement (par.7 Teaches heat exchanger changing temperature, such that a temperature in the interior chamber changes from the first temperature to the second temperature after replacement). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Okechukwu in view of Harrison to include the teachings of Winkler; which would provide an invention includes a pair of two-way valves to control the mixing of fluid from a hot and a cold reservoir to produce the final precisely-controlled fluid stream delivered to the point of usage as disclosed by Winkler (par.8). Regarding claim 9, Okechukwu in view of Harrison teaches the method of claim 7, but fails to teach further comprising preheating the first fluid in a first container to the first temperature before the first stage, and preheating the second fluid in a second container to the second temperature before the second stage. Winkler does teach further comprising preheating the first fluid in a first container to the first temperature before the first stage (par.17 teaches cold reservoir containing a chiller, which maintains temperature by controlling heat (which involves preheating)), and preheating the second fluid in a second container to the second temperature before the second stage (Par.19 teaches hot reservoir containing heater which maintains temperature by controlling heat (which involves preheating)). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Okechukwu in view of Harrison to include the teachings of Winkler; which would provide an invention includes a pair of two-way valves to control the mixing of fluid from a hot and a cold reservoir to produce the final precisely-controlled fluid stream delivered to the point of usage as disclosed by Winkler (par.8). Regarding claim 10, Okechukwu in view of Harrison teaches the method of claim 7, further comprising replacing the first fluid in the interior chamber with the second fluid after the first stage, such that a temperature in the interior chamber changes from the first temperature to the second temperature after replacement. Winkler does teach further comprising replacing the first fluid in the interior chamber with the second fluid after the first stage, such that a temperature in the interior chamber changes from the first temperature to the second temperature after replacement (par.7 Teaches heat exchanger changing temperature, such that a temperature in the interior chamber changes from the first temperature to the second temperature after replacement). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Okechukwu in view of Harrison to include the teachings of Winkler; which would provide an invention includes a pair of two-way valves to control the mixing of fluid from a hot and a cold reservoir to produce the final precisely-controlled fluid stream delivered to the point of usage as disclosed by Winkler (par.8). Claim(s) 13 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Okechukwu in view of Harrison further in view of Pirolli; Laurent et al. (US patent #US 10344592 B2; hereinafter Pirolli; newly cited). Regarding claim 13, Okechukwu in view of Harrison teaches the PVT system of claim 1, but fails to teach wherein the housing includes an inlet and an outlet that is disposed at a higher position than the inlet and the sample cell. Pirolli does teach wherein the housing includes an inlet (col.13 ln 51-52 teaches inlet within valve 2055) and an outlet that is disposed at a higher position than the inlet and the sample cell (fig.3b shows positive flow direction pointing downwards; thus, according to col.13 ln 45-54, the outlet within valve 2057 is at a higher position than the inlet within 2055). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Okechukwu in view of Harrison to include the teachings of Pirolli; which would provide more accurate fluid sensors that address build-up and contamination of sensors and/or membranes in a downhole environment and mechanisms to clean or flush sensors and/membranes using, alone or in combination: Pulsed electric or magnetic fields, chemical solutions, and microwave/ultrasonic heating as disclosed by Pirolli (col.3 ln 4-10). Regarding claim 14, Okechukwu in view of Harrison teaches the method of claim 11, but fails to teach further comprising introducing the temperature control fluid into the interior chamber through an inlet and discharging the temperature control fluid through an outlet that is disposed at a higher position than the inlet and the sample cell . Pirolli does teach further comprising introducing the temperature control fluid into the interior chamber through an inlet (col.13 ln 51-52 teaches inlet within valve 2055) and discharging the temperature control fluid (col.13 ln 61-62 teaches discharging fluid) through an outlet that is disposed at a higher position than the inlet and the sample cell (fig.3a shows positive flow direction pointing downwards; thus, according to col.13 ln 45-54, the outlet within valve 2057 is at a higher position than the inlet within 2055). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Okechukwu in view of Harrison to include the teachings of Pirolli; which would provide more accurate fluid sensors that address build-up and contamination of sensors and/or membranes in a downhole environment and mechanisms to clean or flush sensors and/membranes using, alone or in combination: Pulsed electric or magnetic fields, chemical solutions, and microwave/ultrasonic heating as disclosed by Pirolli (col.3 ln 4-10). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure. US 12163945 B2; Stewart; Colin et al. is for Automated analysis of drilling fluid. US 20120127466 A1; Karnes; Karl et al. is PVT analysis of pressurized fluids. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CARL F.R. TCHATCHOUANG whose telephone number is (571)272-3991. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00am -5:00am. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Huy Phan can be reached at 571-272-7924. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CARL F.R. TCHATCHOUANG/Examiner, Art Unit 2858 /ALVARO E FORTICH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2858
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 16, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 30, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12736587
BATTERY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING A HEALTH OF A POWER SOURCE BASED ON DRIVING EVENTS
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12716797
CRYPTOGRAPHIC TRANSDUCER CALIBRATION SYSTEM FOR HOSE ASSEMBLY TEST BENCHES
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12704481
Fault State Detection Apparatus
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12681003
METHODS AND DEVICES FOR MONITORING MACHINE FLUIDS
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12657679
POWER STATION INSPECTION SYSTEM AND POWER STATION INSPECTION METHOD
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+14.7%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 180 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month