Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/414,334

COMMUNICATION CONTROL METHOD, BASE STATION, AND USER EQUIPMENT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 16, 2024
Examiner
LOPATA, ROBERT J
Art Unit
2471
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Kyocera Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
851 granted / 953 resolved
+31.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+1.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
977
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
§103
26.0%
-14.0% vs TC avg
§102
38.8%
-1.2% vs TC avg
§112
13.6%
-26.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 953 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 1/16/24. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 – 4, 9, 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Zhang et al. (US Publication 2024/0114592) disclosed in (CN 202110665904.6). Regarding claims 1, 9 and 10 Zhang teaches an apparatus and a communication control method used in a mobile communication system, the communication control method comprising: (i.e. fig. 8 shows a access network device comprising a processor hardware and transceiver for executing programmed instructions; see paragraphs 261 – 263, 265) receiving, at a base station shared by a plurality of core networks from each of the plurality of core networks, an MBS service identifier indicating an MBS service provided by the corresponding one of the plurality of core networks; (i.e. figure 1 shows an access network device (base station) may receive from multiple different core networks; see paragraph 71) (See Also; figs 4a and 4b shows an embodiment that supports the access network device may be shared by a first and second core device wherein the access network device may receive a first and second MBS service identifier corresponding the first and second core networks, respectively; see paragraphs 95, 100, 127) and transmitting, at the base station, MBS data belonging to the MBS service to a plurality of user equipment’s belonging to a plurality of Public Land Mobile Networks (PLMNs) corresponding to the plurality of core networks through multicast or broadcast, wherein the MBS service identifier is a unique identifier independent of the plurality of PLMNs. (i.e. figure 1 shows an access network device (base station) may transmit to multiple terminal devices (UEs) having different PLMNs; see paragraph 71) (See Also; figs 4a and 4b shows an embodiment that supports the access network device having received the first MBS service identifier corresponding to a first PLMN and a second MBS identifier corresponding to a second PLMN may transmit broadcast or multicast data to the terminal devices having different PLMNs, according to the service IDs; see paragraphs 160 - 163) (see Also; fig 5. shows the multicast/broadcast service data flow through different core networks via one access network device to a plurality of terminals; see paragraphs 169 - 175) Regarding claims 2 Zhang teaches the communication control method according to claim 1, wherein the transmitting comprises transmitting, in response to reception of identical MBS service identifiers at the base station from the plurality of core networks, the MBS data by using a radio resource common to the plurality of PLMNs. (i.e. fig. 5 shows the access device receiving the same first and second service identifiers from the core networks and transmitting the service data in common radio resource; see paragraphs 169 - 171) Regarding claims 3 Zhang teaches the communication control method according to claim 1, wherein the receiving comprises receiving an MBS session start message comprising the MBS service identifier from each of the plurality of core networks. (i.e. figs 4a shows the MBS service id may be included in a MBS session setup message (401); see paragraphs 97 - 99) Regarding claims 4, Zhang teaches the communication control method according to claim 1, further comprising receiving, at the base station from each of the plurality of core networks, an MBS session identifier corresponding to the MBS service delivered by the corresponding one of the plurality of core networks, wherein the MBS session identifier is an identifier specific to each of the plurality of PLMNs, and wherein the MBS service identifier is an identifier different from the MBS session identifier. (i.e. fig. 5 shows the access device receiving different first and second MBS service identifiers from the core networks and transmitting the service data to different PLMNs; see paragraphs 169, 178 - 180) Allowable Subject Matter Claim 5 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 6 objected to as being dependent upon a objected base claim that would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 7 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 8 objected to as being dependent upon a objected base claim that would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT J LOPATA whose telephone number is (571)270-5158. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 10-7 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sujoy Kundu can be reached at (571)272-8586. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ROBERT J. LOPATA Primary Examiner Art Unit 2471 /ROBERT J LOPATA/ December 29, 2025Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2471
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 16, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Apr 02, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593280
WAKE UP RADIO CLASSIFICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587487
COMMUNICATION CONTROL METHOD, COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND TRANSMISSION-SIDE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581437
DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD AND DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581439
Short-Range Communication Method and Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574874
CLOCK SYNCHRONIZATION MODE INDICATION METHOD AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+1.5%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 953 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month