Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/414,868

Two Cycle Gas Can

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 17, 2024
Examiner
PANCHOLI, VISHAL J
Art Unit
3754
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
671 granted / 921 resolved
+2.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
955
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
47.7%
+7.7% vs TC avg
§102
31.7%
-8.3% vs TC avg
§112
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 921 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kressel, Sr. (US PN 6,494,344) in view of Chrisco (US PN 5,301,829) and Cover (US D657,558). Regarding claims 1 and 5, Kressel, Sr. teaches liquid storage container (item 10, figure 1, it is capable of holding a mixture of gas and oil or any pourable liquid, column 3, lines 52-61) comprising of: a fuel chamber (item 20, figure 1); a hose (item 50, figure 1) and nozzle (item 54, figure 1) to dispense two cycle fuel; a screw on top (item 30, figure 2, column 3, lines 32-37); a handle (item 26, figure 1); a translucent stripe up and down on the side of the can (item 40, figure 1); a gradation of ¼, ½, ¾, and full marks (markings 22 showing various quantities of a 4-gallon volume, figure 2). Kressel, Sr. does not teach a lower tool box with a lid, that the translucent strip is 1 inch wide, a yellow slide pointer with ratios ranging from 1:1 to 50:1; and an embossed chart with instructions with regard to oil to gas ratios. However, Kressel, Sr. does teach that the transparent window is molded on at least one side of the container to visually detect the level of liquid in the container (column 3, lines 31-50) and the marking 22 can be of any form to mark any volume or other information as desired (column 4, lines 46-59). Such marking assist a user in mixing oil and gasoline per a predetermined ration and dispense the mixture (column 4, lines 46-59). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have provided various indicia and other markings on the side of Kressel, Sr.’s container that shows the volume, different mixing ratios, a pointer that points to a particular liquid level or any other relevant printed or molded information since doing so only involves modifying the manufacturing process to form such information. Furthermore, Chrisco teaches a fuel container and a tool box assembly (item 10, figure 1) wherein a top container (item 12, figure 1) holds a fuel and a bottom container (item 14, figure 1) comprises a storage space for tools, wherein the bottom container is attached to the top container via a pair of closable latch members (item 22, 24, figures 1-11). The purpose of such configuration is to provide a user ease in carrying fuel and various tools and other equipment at the same time in a one integrated assembly (column 1, lines 44-68: column 2, lines 1-37). Also, Cover teaches an integrated container (figure 1) with an empty container (figure 8) and multiple toolboxes connected to the container via a hinged door (figure 8). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have combined the teachings of Chrisco and Cover with Kressel, Sr. to provide a tool box at a side or a bottom of the fuel container with a hinged door or a latch assembly in order to provide a user with an integrated fuel container assembly. Lastly, regarding color, it would be obvious to make the container out of any color and material as desired since doing so only involves a routine skill in the art. It has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. (See MPEP § 2144.07). Regarding claims 2-4, Kressel, Sr. as modified as discussed in detail above, can provide a fuel container with a translucent 1″ wide strip and various gradation markings and volume ratios as desired since doing so only involves a routine skill in the art and Kressel, Sr. already teaches some form of transparent window and markings. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The prior arts cited on PTO-892 disclose subject matter related to various types of fuel containers which are related to the instant invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VISHAL J PANCHOLI whose telephone number is (571)272-9324. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday (9 am - 7 pm). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Paul Durand can be reached at 571-272-4459. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Vishal Pancholi/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3754
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593942
DEFORMABLE PLASTIC VESSEL AND SYSTEM FOR REDUCING PLASTIC WASTE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589401
DISPENSER ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589936
SYSTEM FOR DISPENSING A FLUID SUBSTANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583005
DOSING DEVICE, CONTAINER, PRODUCT DISPENSER AND SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583004
FLUID PRODUCT DISPENSER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+6.3%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 921 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month