Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/415,087

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ADAPTIVE POLICY CONTROL IN CELLULAR NETWORKS

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Jan 17, 2024
Examiner
RANDHAWA, MANDISH K
Art Unit
2477
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Verizon Communications Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
362 granted / 555 resolved
+7.2% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
605
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
§103
62.0%
+22.0% vs TC avg
§102
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
§112
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 555 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 2. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 3. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 4. Claims 1-3, 5, 6, 8-10, 12-14, 16, 17, 19 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Dao et al. (US 2021/0235288 A1, hereinafter “Dao”). Regarding claim 1, Dao teaches a method comprising: collecting, by a device (e.g., NWDA of figs. 2, 10, 12A-12C), user behavior data associated with a user equipment (UE) device (figs. 3, 4, 10, 12A-12C, ¶ [0046], ¶ [0107], ¶ [0136], ¶ [0137], the NWDA function 237 may send requests to collect data for data analytics from different network entities. ¶ [0142], The NWDA function 237 may send to the AMF 234 a request message 1205a for UE to provide usage data); determining, by the device, a user behavior pattern for the UE device based on the collected user behavior data (figs. 3, 4, 10, 12A-12C, ¶ [0073], the AMF 234 may request the NWDA 237 to provide the mobility information of UEs 110 including mobility pattern of UEs. ¶ [0144], The NWDA 237 may, in step 1213, perform data analytics based on the data in the database provided by NF 1230, and/or UE, or indicated by OAM. ¶ [0107], message 1214 after the data analytics step 1213 can include the mobility pattern (or mobility trajectory) of specific UEs. Message 1214 after the data analytics step 1213 can include the “Expected UE activity behavior” as specified in TS 23.501, version 2.0.1, published in December 2017, i.e. the expected pattern of the UE's changes between CM-CONNECTED and CM-IDLE states. In message 1214 after the data analytics step 1213 can include the “Expected HO behavior”); generating, by the device, a policy in a core network for the UE device based on the determined user behavior pattern for the UE device (1213 of fig. 12C, figs. 3, 4, ¶ [0083], ¶ [0084], Based on the output of the traffic engineering optimization technique at 340, the NWDA 237 may provide a policy recommendation 350 to the PCF 236. ¶ [0107], ¶ [0131], the PCF 236 sends a request (or subscribe) for the NWDA 237 to return policy information in message 1214 after the data analytics step 1213. ¶ [0136]), wherein the core network manages a communication session for the UE device via a Radio Access Network (RAN) (figs. 2, 12C); and providing, by the device, the generated policy to a Policy Control Function (PCF) in the core network to apply to the communication session for the UE device (figs. 12C, ¶ [0107], ¶ [0131] In yet some other embodiments, the PCF 236 sends the Network Information Request message 1201a. The Network Information Request message 1201a may include a request (or subscribe) for the NWDA 237 to return policy information in message 1214 after the data analytics step 1213. One or more categories of policy information can be requested. For example, UE Route Selection Policy (URSP) can be requested. The PCF may request NWDA to provide charging policies (e.g. cost for connection time, cost for data volume) for different times of the day, for days of the week, for specific (R)AN location. ¶ [0136]). Regarding claim 12, Dao teaches a device (e.g., NWDA of figs. 2, 10, 12A-12C), comprising: a processor (fig. 11) configured to: collect user behavior data associated with a user equipment (UE) device (figs. 3, 4, 10, 12A-12C, ¶ [0046], ¶ [0107], ¶ [0136], ¶ [0137], the NWDA function 237 may send requests to collect data for data analytics from different network entities. ¶ [0142], The NWDA function 237 may send to the AMF 234 a request message 1205a for UE to provide usage data); determine a user behavior pattern for the UE device based on the collected user behavior data (figs. 3, 4, 10, 12A-12C, ¶ [0073], the AMF 234 may request the NWDA 237 to provide the mobility information of UEs 110 including mobility pattern of UEs. ¶ [0144], The NWDA 237 may, in step 1213, perform data analytics based on the data in the database provided by NF 1230, and/or UE, or indicated by OAM. ¶ [0107], message 1214 after the data analytics step 1213 can include the mobility pattern (or mobility trajectory) of specific UEs. Message 1214 after the data analytics step 1213 can include the “Expected UE activity behavior” as specified in TS 23.501, version 2.0.1, published in December 2017, i.e. the expected pattern of the UE's changes between CM-CONNECTED and CM-IDLE states. In message 1214 after the data analytics step 1213 can include the “Expected HO behavior”); generate a policy in a core network for the UE device based on the determined user behavior pattern for the UE device (1213 of fig. 12C, figs. 3, 4, ¶ [0083], ¶ [0084], Based on the output of the traffic engineering optimization technique at 340, the NWDA 237 may provide a policy recommendation 350 to the PCF 236. ¶ [0107], ¶ [0131], the PCF 236 sends a request (or subscribe) for the NWDA 237 to return policy information in message 1214 after the data analytics step 1213. ¶ [0136]), wherein the core network manages a communication session for the UE device via a Radio Access Network (RAN) (figs. 2, 12C); and provide the generated policy to a Policy Control Function (PCF) in the core network to apply to the communication session for the UE device (figs. 12C, ¶ [0107], ¶ [0131] In yet some other embodiments, the PCF 236 sends the Network Information Request message 1201a. The Network Information Request message 1201a may include a request (or subscribe) for the NWDA 237 to return policy information in message 1214 after the data analytics step 1213. One or more categories of policy information can be requested. For example, UE Route Selection Policy (URSP) can be requested. The PCF may request NWDA to provide charging policies (e.g. cost for connection time, cost for data volume) for different times of the day, for days of the week, for specific (R)AN location. ¶ [0136]). Regarding claim 20, Dao teaches a non-transitory computer-readable memory device storing instructions executable by a processor, the non-transitory computer-readable memory device (figs. 2, 10, 12A-12C, ¶ [0046], ¶ [0010], The network element includes a processor; a network interface for communicating with other network entities; and non-transient machine readable memory storing machine readable instructions, which when executed by the processor, configure the network element to implement a network data analytics function (NWDA)) comprising: one or more instructions to collect user behavior data associated with a user equipment (UE) device (figs. 3, 4, 10, 12A-12C, ¶ [0107], ¶ [0136], ¶ [0137], the NWDA function 237 may send requests to collect data for data analytics from different network entities. ¶ [0142], The NWDA function 237 may send to the AMF 234 a request message 1205a for UE to provide usage data); one or more instructions to determine a user behavior pattern for the UE device based on the collected user behavior data (figs. 3, 4, 10, 12A-12C, ¶ [0073], the AMF 234 may request the NWDA 237 to provide the mobility information of UEs 110 including mobility pattern of UEs. ¶ [0144], The NWDA 237 may, in step 1213, perform data analytics based on the data in the database provided by NF 1230, and/or UE, or indicated by OAM. ¶ [0107], message 1214 after the data analytics step 1213 can include the mobility pattern (or mobility trajectory) of specific UEs. Message 1214 after the data analytics step 1213 can include the “Expected UE activity behavior” as specified in TS 23.501, version 2.0.1, published in December 2017, i.e. the expected pattern of the UE's changes between CM-CONNECTED and CM-IDLE states. In message 1214 after the data analytics step 1213 can include the “Expected HO behavior”); one or more instructions to generate a policy in a core network for the UE device based on the determined user behavior pattern for the UE device (1213 of fig. 12C, figs. 3, 4, ¶ [0083], ¶ [0084], Based on the output of the traffic engineering optimization technique at 340, the NWDA 237 may provide a policy recommendation 350 to the PCF 236. ¶ [0107], ¶ [0131], the PCF 236 sends a request (or subscribe) for the NWDA 237 to return policy information in message 1214 after the data analytics step 1213. ¶ [0136]), wherein the core network manages a communication session for the UE device via a Radio Access Network (RAN) figs. 2, 12C); and one or more instructions to provide the generated policy to a Policy Control Function (PCF) in the core network to apply to the communication session for the UE device (figs. 12C, ¶ [0107], ¶ [0131] In yet some other embodiments, the PCF 236 sends the Network Information Request message 1201a. The Network Information Request message 1201a may include a request (or subscribe) for the NWDA 237 to return policy information in message 1214 after the data analytics step 1213. One or more categories of policy information can be requested. For example, UE Route Selection Policy (URSP) can be requested. The PCF may request NWDA to provide charging policies (e.g. cost for connection time, cost for data volume) for different times of the day, for days of the week, for specific (R)AN location. ¶ [0136]). Regarding claims 2 and 13, Dao teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the user behavior data includes information identifying, for a location and a time period, at least one of: a Quality of Service (QoS) parameter for a data flow associated with the UE device, a network slice used by the UE device, a Multi-Access Edge Computing (MEC) service used by the UE device, an application used by the UE device, a core network key performance indicator (KPI) value for a data flow associated with the UE device. or a RAN KPI value for a data flow associated with the UE device ( figs. 3, 4, 12C, ¶ [0046], The NMF 270 may instruct the NWDA 237 to send data of certain UE 110, certain (R)AN nodes 220, or the UPF 231 based on certain criteria (such as geographical locations, time period, specific network entities, events, etc.). The NMF 270 may also request the NWDA 237 to provide a QoS policy recommendation for certain criteria, including certain network slices, certain services, certain time periods, or any combination thereof. ¶ [0054], ¶ [0058]-¶ [0063], ¶ [0132], The Network statistical information can be requested based on various filters, such as for different times of the day, for days of the week, for specific (R)AN locations…for specific UEs, specific UE group(s), for some applications, for UL and/or DL QoS Flows. ¶ [0131], ¶ [0134], ¶ [0142], ¶ [0086], ¶ [0093], ¶ [0094], a policy input or a portion of the policy recommendation associated with the analyzed measurement data corresponding to the time of the day and geographical locations). Regarding claims 3 and 14, Dao teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the generated policy in the core network for the UE device includes a policy to reserve resources for at least one of: guaranteeing a Quality of Service (QoS) parameter value during a time period, a data flow in network slice during the time period, a data flow to a Multi-Access Edge Computing (MEC) service during the time period, guaranteeing a key performance indicator (KPI) value for a data flow during the time period, guaranteeing a minimum throughput for a data flow during the time period, applying a filter to a data flow during the time period, or reporting a key performance indicator (KPI) value for a data flow during the time period (figs. 3, 4, 12C, ¶ [0068], The WDA 237 may send a recommendation for QoS parameters to the PCF 236 via the N23 interface. The QoS parameters may include a GBR rate, a MBR rate, an AMBR rate, different geographical locations, the (R)AN node 220, a time of the day, and a type of PDU flow (e.g. real-time video, real-time voice, video streaming, web browsing, etc.), ¶ [0069], ¶ [0071], ¶ [0079]). Regarding claims 5 and 16, Dao teaches the method of claim 1, further comprising: selecting a group of UE devices; collecting group user behavior data associated with the group of UE devices (figs. 3, 4, 12C, ¶ [0099], The type of policy may be for one UE, or group of UE, or any UE that may access to a network slice instance. ¶ [0106], the NWDA function 237 may include filter information, which may be used to indicate specific Network Information at certain times, certain locations, certain UEs (e.g. list of UE IDs), certain UE groups (e.g. Internal Group ID(s)), certain application (e.g. represented by Application Identifiers), certain network slice (e.g. represented by S-NSSAI, NSI ID), certain PLMN. ¶ [0107], ¶ [0131], ¶ [0142], The request message 1205a may also include an indication to indicate which UEs should provide data, such as the list of UE ID (e.g. SUPI, GPSI), and/or Internal Group ID, and/or S-NSSAI, and/or location information (e.g. (R)AN IDs, CN paging area, registration area, LADN service area, AMF service area, SMF service area, or UPF service area, geographical zone ID, PLMN ID), ¶ [0146]); determining a group user behavior pattern for the group of UE device based on the collected group user behavior data (figs. 3, 4, 12C, ¶ [0107]); generating a user group policy in the core network for the group of UE devices; and providing the generated user group policy to the PCF in the core network to apply to communication sessions associated with the group of UE devices (figs. 3, 4, 12C, ¶ [0099], ¶ [0107], ¶ [0131], the QoS policies can be for particular UEs (represented by UE ID such as SUPI, GPSI); particular UE Groups (represented by Internal Group ID, IMSI-Group ID); for specific (R)AN locations; for specific UPF(s), for specific Geographical Zone IDs; The ATSSS policies can be for specific UE(s); or UEs accessing a DNN, or UEs accessing a network slice instance. ¶ [0134], ¶ [0137]). Regarding claims 6 and 17, Dao teaches the method of claim 5, wherein selecting the group of UE devices includes: selecting a plurality of UE devices managed by an enterprise; selecting a plurality of UE devices associated with a same location; selecting a plurality of UE devices attached to a same base station; selecting a plurality of UE devices that installed a same application; selecting a plurality of UE devices associated with a same device type; selecting a plurality of UE devices associated with a same operating system; or selecting a plurality of UE devices associated with a same radio frequency transceiver processor devices (figs. 3, 4, 12C, ¶ [0099], ¶ [0106], the NWDA function 237 may include filter information, which may be used to indicate specific Network Information at certain times, certain locations, certain UEs, certain UE groups, certain application (e.g. represented by Application Identifiers), certain network slice (e.g. represented by S-NSSAI, NSI ID), certain PLMN. ¶ [0107], ¶ [0108], ¶ [0131], ¶ [0142], The request message 1205a may also include an indication to indicate which UEs should provide data, such as the list of UE ID (e.g. SUPI, GPSI), and/or Internal Group ID, and/or S-NSSAI, and/or location information (e.g. (R)AN IDs, CN paging area, registration area, LADN service area, AMF service area, SMF service area, or UPF service area, geographical zone ID, PLMN ID), ¶ [0146]); Regarding claim 8, Dao teaches the method of claim 1, further comprising: providing an interface to an Application Function (AF) to enable the AF to request the policy for the UE device (figs. 2, 12C, ¶ [0132] In yet some other embodiments, the NF 1220 is the AF 250 and the AF 250 send the Network Information Request message 1201a. ¶ [0107]). Regarding claims 9 and 19, Dao teaches the method of claim 8, further comprising: receiving, from the AF via the provided interface, a request to generate a user group policy in the core network for a group of UE devices for a time period (figs. 2, 12C, ¶ [0132] In yet some other embodiments, the NF 1220 is the AF 250 and the AF 250 send the Network Information Request message 1201a. The Network Information Request message 1201a may include a request for network statistical information. The Network statistical information can be requested based on various filters, such as for different times of the day (e.g. from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm), for days of the week, for specific (R)AN locations…for specific UEs, specific UE group(s) (represented by e.g. Internal Group ID, IMSI Group ID), for some applications (e.g. video streaming, URLLC, IoT smart electricity meters, automated driving V2X applications) which could be represented by Application ID, for UL and/or DL QoS Flows. ¶ [0107]). Regarding claim 10, Dao teaches the method of claim 1, wherein providing the generated policy to the PCF in the core network to apply to the communication session for the UE device is performed via an interface provided by the PCF to receive dynamic policy control information from the core network (figs. 2-4, 10, 12C. ¶ [0106], the NWDA function 237 may send a policy recommendation to the NF 1220, such as one time only, or periodically at certain time of the day, certain day of the week, or any time when the NWDA 2 function 37 decides to send the policy recommendation because of significant changes in the network detected by the NWDA function 237). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 5. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 6. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. 7. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. 8. Claims 4 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dao in view of Naik et al. (US 2024/0154912 A1, hereinafter “Naik”). Regarding claims 4 and 15, Dao teaches the method of claim 1, wherein generating the policy for the UE device in the core network based on the user behavior pattern for the UE device. Dao does not explicitly teach wherein generating the policy in the core network for the UE device includes: using a Deep Q-Learning Network (DQN) to generate the policy for the UE device in the core network based on the user behavior pattern for the UE device. Naik teaches using a DQN to generate policy (¶ [0107]). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, to use a DQN to generate the policy for the UE device in the core network based on the user behavior pattern for the UE device in the system of Dao. The motivation for doing this is a matter of design choice ( ¶ [0107] of Naik). 9. Claims 7 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dao in view of Song et al. (US 2023/0138595 A1, hereinafter “Song”). Regarding claims 7 and 18, Dao teaches the method of claim 5, wherein selecting the group of UE devices includes: identifying a cluster of UE devices (¶ [0099], ¶ [0107], [0108] and ¶ [0131]). Dao does not explicitly teach selecting the group of UE devices includes: identifying a cluster of UE devices using a clustering algorithm. Song teaches selecting the group of UE devices includes: identifying a cluster of UE devices using a clustering algorithm (¶ [0022], ¶ [0023]). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, identify a cluster of UE devices using a clustering algorithm in the system of Dao to perform clustering more efficiently (¶ [0022] of Song). 10. Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dao in view of Palermo et al. (US 11,888,730 B1, hereinafter “Palermo”). Regarding claim 11, Dao teaches the method of claim 1, further updating/adjusting the policy (figs. 2-4, 10, 12C. ¶ [0106], the NWDA function 237 may send a policy recommendation to the NF 1220, such as one time only, or periodically at certain time of the day, certain day of the week, or any time when the NWDA 2 function 37 decides to send the policy recommendation because of significant changes in the network detected by the NWDA function 237). Dao does not explicitly teach further comprising: receiving performance information associated with the generated policy from the core network; and adjusting the generated policy for the UE device based on the received performance information using a reinforcement learning model. Palermo teaches receiving performance information associated with the generated policy and adjusting the generated policy based on the received performance information using a reinforcement learning model (fig. 3, col. 28, lines 39-62). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, to receive performance information associated with the generated policy from the core network, and to adjust the generated policy for the UE device based on the received performance information using a reinforcement learning model in the system of Dao to further improve industrial applicability. Response to Arguments 11. Applicant's arguments filed on April 3, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. 12. Applicant argues “… Contrary to the allegations implied by the Office Action, Dao's NWDA function 237 is directed to collecting network-side measurement data from network entities (e.g., UPF 231, RAN nodes 220, AMF 234, SMF 235) for the purpose of network traffic engineering optimization and policy management across the network as a whole. See, e.g., Dao at paragraphs 0046-0049, and 0075-0084. In particular, Dao describes the data collected as "network entity data," "operation data," "maintenance data," and "measurement reports" from network functions and not as individual UE behavioral data reflecting how a particular user consumes services over time. See, e.g., Dao at paragraph 0047. …Dao’s data collection remains focused on network performance metrics aggregated across entities, not on characterizing the behavioral profile of a specific UE for individualized policy generation… However, the phrase "mobility pattern" in Dao refers to handover behavior and CM-CONNECTED/CM-IDLE state transition statistics derived from AMF signaling data-a network mobility management parameter-not a user behavior pattern, as recited in claim 1. Rather, the claimed "user behavior pattern" is a qualitatively richer characterization of how the user employs the network to inform individualized service-level policy generation, see, for example, paragraphs 0059 and 0068-0075 of Applicant's written description”… Contrary to the above-recited feature of claim 1, Dao's NWDA policy recommendations to the PCF 236 are based on network traffic engineering optimization results, e.g., analysis of (R)AN capacity, PDU session counts, throughput statistics, traffic load, and QoS flow types across the network. The output is network-wide policy recommendations designed to optimize the network as a whole. These recommendations are not generated based on a determined behavioral pattern for a specific UE device, as required by claim 1... In contrast, Dao's data collection is consistently directed at how the network performs, not at how a particular user behaves. Claim 2 is therefore not anticipated by Dao for these additional reasons…Accordingly claim 13 is likewise not anticipated by Dao.” Examiner respectfully disagrees and submits that although the claims are interpreted in light of the specification, limitations from the specification are not read into the claims. See In re Van Geuns, 988 F.2d 1181, 26 USPQ2d 1057 (Fed. Cir. 1993). In this case, the claims merely require, in part, “collecting, by a device, user behavior data associated with a UE device; determining, by the device, a user behavior pattern for the UE device based on the collected user behavior data..” The claims require a device collecting user behavior data. How the device collects the behavior data is not a claim requirement. Further, the claims require determining a user behavior patten of the UE device and generating a policy for the UE device based on the determined user behavior pattern. “A user behavior pattern” being a qualitatively richer characterization of how the user employs the network to inform individualized service-level policy generation is not a claim requirement. Dao teaches a method comprising: collecting, by a device (e.g., NWDA of figs. 2, 10, 12A-12C), user behavior data associated with a user equipment (UE) device (figs. 3, 4, 10, 12A-12C, ¶ [0046], The NMF 270 may instruct the NWDA 237to collect network entity data. The operation data from the UPF 231, (R)AN node 220, and UE 110 may be sent to the NWDA 237. The NWDA 237 may store the collected data in the UDSF 260. The NMF 270 may instruct the NWDA 237 to send data of certain UE 110, certain (R)AN nodes 220, or the UPF 231 based on certain criteria (such as geographical locations, time period, specific network entities, events, etc.). ¶ [0054], ¶ [0107], ¶ [0136], ¶ [0137], the NWDA function 237 may send requests to collect data for data analytics from different network entities. ¶ [0142], The NWDA function 237 may send to the AMF 234 a request message 1205a for UE to provide usage data. ¶ [0132], ¶ [0132], The Network statistical information can be requested based on various filters, such as for different times of the day, for days of the week, for specific (R)AN locations…for specific UEs, specific UE group(s), for some applications, for UL and/or DL QoS Flows.); determining, by the device, a user behavior pattern for the UE device based on the collected user behavior data (figs. 3, 4, 10, 12A-12C, ¶ [0073], the AMF 234 may request the NWDA 237 to provide the mobility information of UEs 110 including mobility pattern of UEs. ¶ [0144], The NWDA 237 may, in step 1213, perform data analytics based on the data in the database provided by NF 1230, and/or UE, or indicated by OAM. ¶ [0107], the AMF 234 may send the Network Information Request message 1201a to the NWDA function 237 for information related to access and mobility management. For example the request 1201 message may include the network slice information (e.g. S-NSSAI, NSI ID), the UE information such as UE IDs (e.g. SUPI, or GPSI), Internal Group ID (representing a group of UEs), the connection state that UE stays in (e.g. RRC-INACTIVE, or CM-IDLE, or CM-CONNECTED, or MICO mode. The information related to access and mobility management returned by the NWDA 237 in message 1214 after the data analytics step 1213 may include statistics (e.g. minimum value, maximum value, average value) of configuration parameters, for example the minimum duration, maximum duration, average duration that UEs accessing a Network Slice stay in RRC-INACTIVE state, or stay in CM-IDLE state, or stay in CM-CONNECTED state). Further, the request message may include the UE ID(s), the start time (e.g. 9:00 AM) and end time (e.g. 17:00 PM) of the day, the day(s) of the weekday (e.g. Monday, Tuesday). In which case the information related to access and mobility management returned by the NWDA 237 in message 1214 after the data analytics step 1213 can include the mobility pattern (or mobility trajectory) of specific UEs. In some embodiments, The request message 1201a may include the UE ID(s), the start time (e.g. 9:00 AM) and end time (e.g. 17:00 PM) of the day, the day(s) of the weekday (e.g. Monday, Tuesday), and optionally the RAT type . In which case the information related to access and mobility management returned by the NWDA 237 in message 1214 after the data analytics step 1213 can include the “Expected UE activity behavior” as specified in TS 23.501, version 2.0.1, published in December 2017, i.e. the expected pattern of the UE's changes between CM-CONNECTED and CM-IDLE states. In some embodiments, the request message may include the UE ID(s), the start time (e.g. 9:00 AM) and end time (e.g. 17:00 PM) of the day, the day(s) of the weekday (e.g. Monday, Tuesday), optionally the RAT type. In which case the information related to access and mobility management returned by the NWDA 237 in message 1214 after the data analytics step 1213 can include the “Expected HO behavior” as specified in TS 23.501, version 2.0.1, published in December 2017, i.e. the expected interval between inter-RAN handovers); generating, by the device, a policy in a core network for the UE device based on the determined user behavior pattern for the UE device (1213 of fig. 12C, figs. 3, 4, ¶ [0083], ¶ [0084], Based on the output of the traffic engineering optimization technique at 340, the NWDA 237 may provide a policy recommendation 350 to the PCF 236. ¶ [0107], ¶ [0131], the PCF 236 sends a request (or subscribe) for the NWDA 237 to return policy information in message 1214 after the data analytics step 1213. ¶ [0136]. ¶ [0046], The NMF 270 may instruct the NWDA 237 to send data of certain UE 110, certain (R)AN nodes 220, or the UPF 231 based on certain criteria (such as geographical locations, time period, specific network entities, events, etc.). The NMF 270 may also request the NWDA 237 to provide a QoS policy recommendation for certain criteria, including certain network slices, certain services, certain time periods, or any combination thereof. ¶ [0054], ¶ [0058]-¶ [0063], ¶ [0132], The Network statistical information can be requested based on various filters, such as for different times of the day, for days of the week, for specific (R)AN locations…for specific UEs, specific UE group(s), for some applications, for UL and/or DL QoS Flows. ¶ [0131], For example, UE Route Selection Policy (URSP) can be requested. This can be for UEs belonging to a UE Group (e.g. Internal Group ID, IMSI-Group ID), for UEs that connect to a Network Slice (e.g. represented by S-NSSAI), for UEs that connect to a DNN, or for UEs that connect to a Access Type (for example 3GPP 5G, 4G, non-3GPP (WiFi)). Further, QoS policies (QoS Profiles for (R)AN nodes, QoS Rules for UEs, QoS policies for UPFs) can be requested. The QoS policies can be for particular UEs (represented by UE ID such as SUPI, GPSI); particular UE Groups (represented by Internal Group ID, IMSI-Group ID); for time of the day (e.g. from 8:00 am to 9:00 am), for days of the week (e.g. weekdays or weekend, or specific weekdays like Monday, Friday); for specific (R)AN locations (represented by, e.g. (R)AN ID, (R)AN IP Address, (R)AN FQDN, Tracking Area(s), Registration Area(s)); for specific UPF(s) (represented by UPF ID(s), or UPF IP Address(es)), for specific Geographical Zone IDs; or for specific network slice(s) (represented by e.g. S-NSSAI, or NSI-ID).. The ATSSS policies can be for specific UE(s). ¶ [0134], ¶ [0142], ¶ [0086], ¶ [0093], ¶ [0094], a policy input or a portion of the policy recommendation associated with the analyzed measurement data corresponding to the time of the day and geographical locations), wherein the core network manages a communication session for the UE device via a Radio Access Network (RAN) (figs. 2, 12C); and providing, by the device, the generated policy to a Policy Control Function (PCF) in the core network to apply to the communication session for the UE device (figs. 12C, ¶ [0107], ¶ [0131] In yet some other embodiments, the PCF 236 sends the Network Information Request message 1201a. The Network Information Request message 1201a may include a request (or subscribe) for the NWDA 237 to return policy information in message 1214 after the data analytics step 1213. One or more categories of policy information can be requested. For example, UE Route Selection Policy (URSP) can be requested. The PCF may request NWDA to provide charging policies (e.g. cost for connection time, cost for data volume) for different times of the day, for days of the week, for specific (R)AN location. ¶ [0136]). Therefore, claims (1, 2, 12, 13 and 20) are anticipated by Dao, as set forth above. Conclusion 13. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. 14. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MANDISH RANDHAWA whose telephone number is (571)270-5650. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday (9 AM-7 PM). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chirag Shah can be reached at 571-272-3144. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MANDISH K RANDHAWA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2477
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 03, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 07, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707326
MULTICAST FLOW OPTIMIZATIONS IN A MULTI-LEVEL BACKHAUL MESH OF A WIRELESS NETWORK
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701561
COMMON BEAM DIRECTION INDICATION FOR SINGLE-TARGET AND MULTI-TARGET COMMUNICATIONS
4y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695581
COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12683967
DETERMINING POLICY RULES IN A MOBILE NETWORK USING SUBSCRIPTION DATA IN AN APPLICATION SERVER
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12659804
USER EQUIPMENT AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD FOR NETWORK SLICING
5y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+27.0%)
3y 7m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 555 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month