Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/416,310

PHENOL MIXTURE, EPOXY RESIN, EPOXY RESIN COMPOSITION, CURED PRODUCT, AND ELECTRICAL/ELECTRONIC COMPONENT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 18, 2024
Priority
Jul 19, 2021 — JP 2021-119171 +1 more
Examiner
WITHERSPOON, SIKARL A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
66%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
1422 granted / 1650 resolved
+26.2% vs TC avg
Minimal -20% lift
Without
With
+-20.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1673
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
61.7%
+21.7% vs TC avg
§102
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
§112
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1650 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-7 are is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Murata (US 2002/0077422) in view of Kato (JP 2004002830). The claims are drawn to a phenol mixture comprising 3,3’,5,5’-4,4’-tetramethyl-biphenol (TMBP) as a main component, and further comprising from between 0.3% and 10.0% by wt. of a polphenylene ether, and from 1.3% to 4.0% by wt. of tetramethyldiphenoquinone (TMQ). The claims are also drawn to an epoxy resin obtained by reacting the phenol mixture with an epihalohydrin; to an epoxy resin composition comprising a curing agent and the epoxy resin; a cured product; and an electric/electronic component. Murata teaches an epoxy resin composition obtained by reacting TMBP with an epihalohydrin in the presence of an alkali metal compound. The epoxy resin composition produced comprises a content of TMQ of 0.5% by wt. or less. The epoxy resin composition taught by Murata may also contain other high performance epoxy resins. The epoxy resin composition also includes a hardener, i.e., a curing agent, selected from polyhydric phenols, acid anhydrides, imidazoles, and amines. The epoxy resin compositions are used in encapsulation, adhesion, or the like of electrical and electronics parts (abstract; 0004;0015-0024; 0048-0054). Murata does not expressly teach the presence of a polyphenylene ether in the phenol mixture used to produce the epoxy resin composition taught therein; however, Kato teaches TMBP and its use in producing an epoxy resin composition. According to Kato, when TMBP is produced, by-products including tetramethyldiphenoquinone and polyphenylene ethers (about 0.28%) are produced. According to both Murata, and Kato, small amounts of such by-products formed during the production or TMBP may be present in a TMBP solution, when reacting with an epihalohydrin to produce an epoxy resin composition. The instant claims are therefore rendered obvious by the combined reference teachings, as a person having ordinary skill in the art would have found that a phenol mixture comprising TMBP as the main component, and smaller amounts of polyphenylene ethers, and tetramethyldiphenoquinone, may be reacted with an epihalohydrin to produce an epoxy resin composition without the electric characteristics of the cured epoxy resin product deteriorating. This allows for production of epoxy resin compositions without having to go through substantive purification steps of the TMBP prior to reacting with the epihalohydrin. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SIKARL A WITHERSPOON whose telephone number is (571)272-0649. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-9pm IFP. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Scarlett Goon can be reached at 571-270-5241. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SIKARL A WITHERSPOON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1692
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673093
METHOD AND COMPOSITION FOR TREATING ARGINASE 1 DEFICIENCY
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667833
NANOHYBRID CATALYST FOR HYDROGENATION REACTIONS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662443
HIGH PURITY 4-HYDROXYSTYRENE SOLUTION, METHOD OF PRODUCING THE SAME, AND METHOD OF PRODUCING 4-HYDROXYSTYRENE POLYMER
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12655094
CANNABINOID SULFATE ESTERS, THEIR SALTS AND USES THEREOF
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12655085
PREPARATION METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR METHYL METHACRYLATE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
66%
With Interview (-20.3%)
1y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1650 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month