Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/416,402

ADJUSTABLE UNDERCOUNTER MOUNT FOR WIRELESS POWER TRANSMITTER

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 18, 2024
Examiner
HABIB, ASIFA
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Midea Group Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
279 granted / 362 resolved
+17.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
373
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
61.2%
+21.2% vs TC avg
§102
24.8%
-15.2% vs TC avg
§112
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 362 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on01/18/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-15, 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by Rowan Sr. et al. 5,806,948. Regarding claim 1, Rowan discloses an undercounter wireless power system (battery cabinet), comprising: a wireless power transmitter (telecommunication equipment); a tray (tray 28] housing the wireless power transmitter [FIG 1-2] [col 5, l. 60-65]; and an adjustable rail (rails) [col 4, l. 5-10] configured to support the tray proximate an underside of a countertop (cabinet 20)supported by a base cabinet (housing 22) [FIG 1-2], the adjustable rail including first and second opposing ends respectively configured to be secured to first and second opposing support structures of the base cabinet, the adjustable rail having an adjustable length to position the first and second opposing ends thereof proximate the first and second opposing support structures [col 3, l. 5-19] col. 7, l. 30-50]. Regarding claim 2, Rowan discloses all of the limitations of claim 1. Rowan further discloses the adjustable rail is configured to extend between a front side and a rear side of the base cabinet to support the tray proximate the underside of the countertop through a front-to-rear mounting to the base cabinet [col 4, l. 5-10] [FIG 2-3]. Regarding claim 3, Rowan discloses all of the limitations of claim 1. Rowan further discloses the adjustable rail is configured to extend between a left side and a right side of the base cabinet to support the tray proximate the underside of the countertop through a left-to-right mounting to the base cabinet [col 4, l. 5-10] [FIG 2-3]. Regarding claim 4, Rowan discloses all of the limitations of claim 1. Rowan further discloses the adjustable rail is configured to support the tray at an adjustable position between the first and second opposing support structures [col 4, l. 5-10][FIG 1-2]. Regarding claim 5, Rowan discloses all of the limitations of claim 1. Rowan further discloses the adjustable rail is configured to support the tray proximate the underside of the countertop with no direct fastening of the tray or the adjustable rail to the countertop [col 4, l. 5-10] [FIG 2-3]. Regarding claim 6, Rowan discloses all of the limitations of claim 1. Rowan further discloses the adjustable rail is a first adjustable rail, and the undercounter wireless power system further includes a second adjustable rail configured to support the tray proximate an opposite side of the tray from the first adjustable rail, the second adjustable rail including first and second opposing ends respectively configured to be secured to the first and second opposing support structures of the base cabinet, and the second adjustable rail having an adjustable length to position the first and second opposing ends thereof proximate the first and second opposing support structures [FIG 1-2]. Regarding claim 7, Rowan discloses all of the limitations of claim 1. Rowan further discloses a mounting bracket (bracket 60) secured to the adjustable rail, wherein the adjustable rail supports the tray using the mounting bracket [FIG 1-2] [col. 5, l. 12-23]. Regarding claim 8, Rowan discloses all of the limitations of claim 7. Rowan further discloses the tray includes a mounting lip disposed proximate a periphery thereof, and the mounting bracket includes a flange that engages the mounting lip of the tray [FIG 1-2] [col. 5, l. 12-23]. Regarding claim 9, Rowan discloses all of the limitations of claim 8. Rowan further discloses the flange is resilient to clamp the tray against the underside of the countertop [FIG 1-2] [col. 5, l. 12-23]. Regarding claim 10, Rowan discloses all of the limitations of claim 8. Rowan further discloses the mounting bracket includes one or more set screws (the screws that go into to the slits on bracket 60) extending through the flange of the mounting bracket to such that the flange engages the mounting lip of the tray through the one or more set screws to thereby clamp the tray against the underside of the countertop [FIG 2]. Regarding claim 11, Rowan discloses all of the limitations of claim 8. Rowan further discloses the mounting lip includes left, right, front, and rear portions respectively configured to extend toward left, right, front, and rear sides of the base cabinet, wherein the flange of the mounting bracket is configured to engage the mounting lip of the tray at any one of the left, right, front, and rear portions thereof to support both left-to-right and front-to-rear mounting to the base cabinet [FIG2]. Regarding claim 12, Rowan discloses all of the limitations of claim 7. Rowan further discloses the mounting bracket is removably secured to the adjustable rail and is configured to be independently secured to a support structure of a different base cabinet when separated from the adjustable rail [FIG 2]. Regarding claim 13, Rowan discloses all of the limitations of claim 12. Rowan further discloses the adjustable rail includes first and second rail members, the first rail member is sized and configured to slide within the second rail member, at least one of the first and second rail members includes a slot extending along at least a portion of the length thereof, and the mounting bracket is removably secured to the adjustable rail using at least one nut and bolt assembly that extends through the slot to fix the length of the adjustable rail [col 6, l. 24-30] [col 8, l. 45-53] [FIG 1-2]. Regarding claim 14, Rowan discloses all of the limitations of claim 13. Rowan further discloses the at least one nut and bolt assembly further extends through the mounting bracket to secure the mounting bracket to the adjustable rail [col 8, l. 45-53]. Regarding claim 15, Rowan discloses all of the limitations of claim 1. Rowan further discloses a power electronics enclosure (the casing to the battery) physically separated from the tray and configured to be secured to a wall of the base cabinet; a power supply disposed in the power electronics enclosure and configured to generate a power signal to drive the wireless power transmitter; and at least one power cable extending between the power electronics enclosure and the tray to communicate the power signal to the wireless power transmitter. [FIG 1-3]. Regarding claim 17, Rowan discloses an undercounter wireless power system, comprising: a wireless power transmitter (telecommunication equipment); a tray housing (tray 28) the wireless power transmitter, the tray including a mounting lip disposed proximate a periphery thereof [col 5, l. 60-67]; and a mounting bracket (bracket 60) configured to be secured to a support structure of a base cabinet, the mounting bracket including a flange configured to engage the mounting lip of the tray when secured to the support structure of the base cabinet and thereby support the tray proximate an underside of a countertop supported by the base cabinet [col 5, l. 12-23] [FIG 1-2]. Regarding claim 18, he adjustable rail includes first and second rail members, the first rail member is sized and configured to slide within the second rail member, at least one of the first and second rail members includes a slot extending along at least a portion of the length thereof, and the mounting bracket is removably secured to the adjustable rail using at least one nut and bolt assembly that extends through the slot to fix the length of the adjustable rail [col 6, l. 24-30] [col 8, l. 45-53] [FIG 1-2]. Regarding claim 19, Rowan discloses all of the limitations of claim 17. Rowan further discloses the mounting lip includes left, right, front, and rear portions respectively configured to extend toward left, right, front, and rear sides of the base cabinet, wherein the flange of the mounting bracket is configured to engage the mounting lip of the tray at any one of the left, right, front, and rear portions thereof to support both left-to-right and front-to-rear mounting to the base cabinet [FIG 1-2]. Regarding claim 20, Rowan discloses . an adjustable undercounter mount for an undercounter wireless power system of a type including a wireless power transmitter (telecommunication equipment) and a tray housing (tray 28) the wireless power transmitter, the adjustable undercounter mount comprising: a mounting bracket (bracket 60) [col 5, l. 12-23]configured to support the tray proximate an underside of a countertop supported by a base cabinet; and an adjustable rail (rails ) removably secured to the mounting bracket and including first and second opposing ends respectively configured to be secured to first and second opposing support structures of the base cabinet, the adjustable rail having an adjustable length to position the first and second opposing ends thereof proximate the first and second opposing support structures; wherein the mounting bracket is configured to be independently secured to a support structure of a different base cabinet when separated from the adjustable rail [col 5, l. 5-65] [col 7, l. 30-50] [FIG 1-2]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 16 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rowan Sr. et al. 5,806,948 in view of Fawaz et al. 2024/0000287. Regarding claim 16, Rowan discloses all of the limitations of claim 1. However, Rowan fails to disclose a near field communication (NFC) antenna and a controller disposed in the tray and electrically coupled to the NFC antenna to communicate with a wirelessly powered device positioned on the countertop proximate the wireless power transmitter, the controller further electrically coupled to the power supply through at least one control cable extending between the tray and the power electronics enclosure to control the power supply to selectively supply power to the wirelessly powered device through the wireless power transmitter. Fawaz discloses an undermount wireless power system that a near field communication (NFC) antenna and a controller disposed in the tray and electrically coupled to the NFC antenna to communicate with a wirelessly powered device positioned on the countertop proximate the wireless power transmitter, the controller further electrically coupled to the power supply through at least one control cable extending between the tray and the power electronics enclosure to control the power supply to selectively supply power to the wirelessly powered device through the wireless power transmitter [025-27] [039] [042]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention as it is well known in the art to use NFC communication in the wireless power systems. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ASIFA HABIB whose telephone number is (571)270-7032. The examiner can normally be reached 10-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steve Paik can be reached at 571-272-2404. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ASIFA HABIB/Examiner, Art Unit 2876 /THIEN M LE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2876
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 18, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12731469
FIXED RETAIL SCANNER WITH ANNOTATED VIDEO AND RELATED METHODS
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12718640
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRACKING ACCESS TO AN AREA USING ULTRA-WIDEBAND RADIO TECHNOLOGY
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12718667
Unauthorized Activity Detection at Automated Teller Machine
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12716579
LED LIGHT SOURCE DEVICE AND BIOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS DEVICE
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12699277
ADAPTIVE FEEDBACK CONTROL OF AN OPTRONIC SIGHT
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+14.9%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 362 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month