Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/417,020

Swing-Type Sports Apparatus Measurement Device

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 19, 2024
Examiner
WOODWARD, NATHANIEL T
Art Unit
2855
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
technorama Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
495 granted / 585 resolved
+16.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
611
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
46.1%
+6.1% vs TC avg
§102
18.2%
-21.8% vs TC avg
§112
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 585 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-8 are pending in the present application. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 1/19/2024 was filed. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: In para. [0042], the list of reference numerals includes periods even though the figures and specification does not. For example, the Display is labeled 61 in Fig. 1 and para. [0033], and then labeled 6.1 in para. [0042]. The Examiner suggests that deleting the periods throughout para. [0042] would overcome this objection. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 2, there is a lack of antecedent basis for the phrase “the upper end of the fixed frame”. For the purpose of examination, the phrase has been read as “an upper end of the fixed frame”. Regarding claim 3, there is a lack of antecedent basis for the phrase “the engagement member”. For the purpose of examination, the phrase has been read as “an engagement member”. Regarding claim 4, there is a lack of antecedent basis for the phrase “the upper end of the adjusting screw”. For the purpose of examination, the phrase has been read as “an upper end of the adjusting screw”. Regarding claim 5, this claim is rejected for failing to remedy the rejection of claims 2-4 above under 35 U.S.C. 112(b). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 and 6-8 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding claims 1 and 6-8, Latiri (US PGPUB 2018/0345105 A1, hereinafter Latiri) represents the best art of record. However, Latiri fails to encompass all of the limitations of independent claim 1. Regarding claim 1, Latiri teaches a measuring device for a swinging sports apparatus (see Fig. 2-3, all elements; see also Abstract), comprising: at least one pressure-holding unit (6) having a base (61), the base comprising a fixed frame (6111) having at least one pressure-holding assembly (611) and a top abutment member (see Fig. 3, vertical portion of 6111 considered a top abutment member); wherein the at least one pressure-holding assembly (611) includes an adjusting rod (6112), the adjusting screw being provided with a first pressure block (6113); wherein the base (61) is provided with a locking shaft hole (see Fig. 3, base 61 has locking shaft holes as shown), the locking shaft hole is threaded with a bolt (see Fig. 3, base 61 has locking shaft threaded holes for bolts as shown); wherein the pressure-holding unit is configured to rotate freely (see Fig. 8, pressure holding unit 6 may rotate freely as shown). Latiri fails to specifically teach an adjusting screw connected to the adjusting rod; the first pressure block being connected to a second pressure block that can be freely connected and detached; and a limiting hole, the limiting hole is threaded with a limiting bolt; wherein the pressure-holding unit is configured to rotate freely with the bolt in the locking shaft hole as a center of rotation; and wherein the limiting hole and the limiting bolt restrict a rotation angle of the pressure-holding unit. This allows for the measurement of three static mechanical characteristics, including length, weight, the center of mass, as well as horizontal rotational inertia of dynamic mechanical characteristics, thereby enhancing the efficiency of the measurement device for swing-type exercise equipment as described by the Applicant (see Specification, para. [0008]). Hence the best prior art or record fails to teach the invention as set forth in independent claim 1 and the examiner can find no teachings for a measuring device for a swinging sprots apparatus as particularly claimed, nor reasons within the cited prior art or on his own to combine the elements of these references other than the applicant's own reasoning to fully encompass the current pending claims. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Claim 5 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NATHANIEL T WOODWARD whose telephone number is (571)270-0704. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Patrick Assouad can be reached at (571) 272-2210. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NATHANIEL T WOODWARD/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 19, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Apr 07, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601622
ACOUSTIC ISOLATORS FOR GAS TRANSDUCERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601619
PHOTOELECTRIC FLOWMETER CIRCUIT AND A PHOTOELECTRIC FLOWMETER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596039
FORCE SENSOR MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596024
ULTRASONIC METER WITH SINGLE TRANSDUCER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583557
FUEL DELIVERY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+14.6%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 585 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month