Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/417,146

COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR SHARING DIFFERENTIALLY PRIVATE RELIABILITY DATA IN AN IIOT INFRASTRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 19, 2024
Examiner
SONG, HOSUK
Art Unit
2435
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
95%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 95% — above average
95%
Career Allow Rate
1440 granted / 1520 resolved
+36.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1544
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
§103
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
§102
37.0%
-3.0% vs TC avg
§112
13.6%
-26.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1520 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Claims 1-7 are pending in this application. Information Disclosure Statement The Information Disclosure Statement(s) submitted by applicant on 1/9/2024 have been considered. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Form PTO-1449 signed and attached hereto. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1,7 recites the limitation "the application". There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 2-5, dependent on claim 1, follow therewith. Claim 1,7 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being incomplete for omitting essential steps, such omission amounting to a gap between the steps. See MPEP § 2172.01. Claim lacks essential steps such as outputting, storing, analyzing, evaluating, displaying, transmitting and triggering of differentially private reliability data and/or any other related notification. Applicant is advised to incorporate above missing steps in to the claim to ensure clarity and definiteness. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claim 6 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Claim Objections Claims 1,7 objected to because of the following informalities: The word “proceALOssing” is a typo. Appropriate correction is required. USPTO Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HOSUK SONG whose telephone number is (571)272-3857. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri: 7:30AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Hirl can be reached at 571-272-3685. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HOSUK SONG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2435
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 19, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Apr 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602460
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598089
BLOCKCHAIN ZIPPER ENCRYPTED PACKAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598158
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SECURING NETWORK TRAFFIC
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596812
ATTACK ROUTE EXTRACTION SYSTEM, ATTACK ROUTE EXTRACTION METHOD, AND PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593212
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FRAUD DETECTION THROUGH NETWORK MONITORING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
95%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+0.5%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1520 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month