Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/417,872

METHOD OF TRANSCEIVING SIDELINK POSITIONING PROTOCOL MESSAGE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND APPARATUS THEREOF

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 19, 2024
Examiner
BARAKAT, MOHAMED
Art Unit
2689
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Lg Electronics INC.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
612 granted / 830 resolved
+11.7% vs TC avg
Strong +38% interview lift
Without
With
+38.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
857
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
49.7%
+9.7% vs TC avg
§102
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
§112
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 830 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim status Claims 1-10 and 12 are currently pending for examination. Claim Objections Claim 3 is objected to because of the following informalities: “an positioning protocol” in lines 2 and 3-4 should be “a positioning protocol”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 6 is objected to because of the following informalities: “the user equipment” in line 5 should be “the first user equipment”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 8 is objected to because of the following informalities “an positioning protocol” in lines 2 and 3 should be “a positioning protocol”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-5 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1recite the limitation "the at least one positioning protocol transaction" in line 11. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claims. Claim 6 recite the limitation "the at least one positioning protocol transaction" in line 14. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claims. Claim 12 recite the limitation "the at least one positioning protocol transaction" in line 13. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claims. Claims 2-5 depend on claim 1 and claims 7-10 depend on claim 6. Claims 2-5 and 7-10 are also indefinite because they depend on a base claim that is indefinite. Allowable Subject Matter 6. Claims 1-10 and 12 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion 7. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to Applicant's disclosure: see PTO-892 Notice of Reference Cited. 8. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MOHAMED BARAKAT whose telephone number is (571)270-3696. The examiner can normally be reached on 9:00am-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Davetta Goins can be reached on (571) 272-2957. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MOHAMED BARAKAT/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2689
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 19, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 15, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589764
VEHICLE OPERATOR SLEEP CONDITION REMEDIATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589693
VEHICULAR LAMP, CONTROL DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD FOR VEHICULAR LAMP, VEHICULAR LAMP SYSTEM, AND CONFIGURATING DEVICE AND CONFIGURATING METHOD FOR VEHICULAR LAMP
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586459
ILLUMINATING A ROAD CROSSING TO INDICATE A SAFE CROSSING CONDITION FOR A USER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582352
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TRANSDERMAL ALCOHOL MONITORING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581304
VERIFICATION METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICE INSURANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+38.2%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 830 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month