DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114
A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 1/8/26 has been entered.
Response to Amendment/Arguments
With the claim amendment submitted 1/8/26, entered with the RCE filed 2/9/26, claims 1 and 8 have been amended. The claim amendments are addressed in the new ground of rejection presented below, including the newly applied reference to Lim et al.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action.
Claims 1 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Vermani et al. “Further Ideas on EHT Preamble Design”* in view of Lim et al. U.S. Patent No. 12,284,631 and Verma U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No. 2019/0116513* (*previously cited by Applicant).
Regarding claims 1 and 8, Vermani discloses a communication method and apparatus, the apparatus comprising: circuitry, which, in operation, generates an Extremely High Throughput Physical Layer Protocol Data Unit (EHT PPDU) comprising an Universal Signal (U-SIG) field and an EHT signal field (see Slide 5, EHT PPDU: Pre-SIG, EHT-SIG Common), the EHT-SIG field contains a Common field and a User Specific field being together referred to as an EHT-SIG content channel (see Slide 5: EHT-SIG-common and EHT-SIG-per-user), where both the U-SIG field and the EHT-SIG field are present in the EHT PPDU transmitted to a single station (STA) or multiples STAs (see Slides 5-6).
Vermani does not expressly show that the U-SIG field contains U-SIG field 1 and U-SIG field 2, each comprising an equal number of data bits, the U-SIG field 1 includes version independent fields including a physical layer (PHY) Version Identity field, an uplink/downlink (UL/DL) Flag field, a basic service set (BSS) Color field, a transmission opportunity (TXOP) Duration field, and a bandwidth field, the U-SIG field 2 includes an EHT-SIG modulation and coding scheme (MCS) field, a number of EHT-SIG Symbols, a Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC) field, and tail bits.
Lim discloses a U-SIG field that is split into two U-SIG symbols of equal number of data bits (col. 21, ll. 16-20), the first symbol includes version independent fields including a PHY Version Identity field (PHY version identifier – col. 21, ll. 55-67), a UL/DL flag (col. 22, ll. 10-14); a BSS Color field and a TXOP Duration field (col. 22, ll. 15-18; col. 46, ll. 64-65), and also discloses that a first field of the U-SIG may include a bandwidth field (col. 22, ll. 64-65); and Lim further discloses that the second symbol of the A-bit information may include a CRC field and a tail field (col. 21, ll. 46-47), as well as information related to an MCS (col. 22, ll. 27-29), and a number of EHT-SIG symbols (col. 22, ll. 31-32). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to employ the U-SIG scheme of Lim, in the apparatus of Vermani, as it is a combining of prior art elements according to known methods, and would yield predictable results (see MPEP § 2143 I.A.).
Vermani also does not expressly, in a case when the EHT PPDU is transmitted to the single STA, the User Specific field comprises a single User field, and the EHT PPDU contains a single EHT content channel regardless of a bandwidth of the EHT PPDU, the single EHT content channel duplicated for each 20 MHz frequency segment.
Verma discloses that SIG-B field content channels may be duplicated to accommodate larger bandwidths and include 20 MHz segments (¶ [0060]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to duplicate SIG fields of content channel as suggested by Verma, in the communication method/apparatus of Vermani, in order to accommodate larger bandwidths, where in the proposed combination, the circuitry of the communication apparatus would be able to generate and transmit to a single STA, an EHT PPDU that contains a single EHT content channel regardless of a bandwidth of the EHT PPDU that is duplicated for each 20 MHz frequency segment.
Claims 2, 4-7, 9 and 11-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Vermani et al. in view of Lim et al. and Verma et al., as applied to claims 1 and 8 above, and further in view of Noh et al. U.S. Pat. No. 10,959,121.
Regarding claims 2 and 9, Vermani in combination with Lim and Verma disclose a communication apparatus and method, as described above, but do not disclose that the U-SIG field has a single format in non-trigger-based communications with one or more STAs.
Noh discloses that a SIG field can have set format for a non-trigger-based PPDU (col. 14, ll. 31-37). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to provide a signal field with a single format for non-trigger-based communications, as suggested by Noh, in the apparatus/method of Vermani, Lim and Verma, as it is a combination of prior art elements according to known methods, and would yield predictable results (see MPEP § 2143.I.A.).
Regarding claims 4 and 11, Vermani in combination with Lim and Verma disclose a communication apparatus and method, as described above, and Vermani further discloses that the EHT-SIG field comprises part of version dependent bits (see slides 5-6), but do not expressly disclose non-trigger-based communications.
Noh discloses a SIG field for a non-trigger-based PPDU (col. 14, ll. 31-37). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to provide non-trigger communications, as suggested by Noh, in the apparatus/method of Vermani, Lim and Verma, as it is a combination of prior art elements according to known methods, and would yield predictable results (see MPEP § 2143.I.A.).
Regarding claims 5 and 12, in the proposed combination, Vermani further discloses the use of PPDU BW and puncturing information (Slide 3, bullet point 2), where such information would be present in the EHT SU PPDU SIG structure (i.e. of slide 6).
Regarding claims 6 and 13, Vermani further discloses that the puncturing bitmap is determined based on PPDU BW (Slide 3, bullet point 2).
Regarding claims 7 and 14, Vermani suggests that the U-SIG field comprises information for interpreting the EHT-SIG field, as it includes version identifier, PPDU BW and puncturing information associated with the SIG field (Slide 3).
Claims 3 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Vermani et al. in view of Lim et al. and Verma et al., as applied to claims 1 and 8 above, and further in view of Park et al. U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No. 2020/0136884.
Regarding claims 3 and 10 Vermani in combination with Lim and Verma disclose a communication apparatus and method, as described above, but do not disclose that the Common field contains a Common field 1 and a Common field 2, which are separately encoded in the content channel.
Park discloses a EHT PPDU where a Common-SIG 810 has two portions 822, 824, which may be separately encoded (¶ [0105]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to provide separately encoded Common Signal fields, as suggested by Park, in the apparatus/method of Vermani, Lim and Verma, as it is a combination of prior art elements according to known methods, and would yield predictable results (see MPEP § 2143.I.A.).
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to David B. Lugo whose telephone number is 571-272-3043. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 9-6.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hannah Wang can be reached at 571-272-9018. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/DAVID B LUGO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2631
2/20/2026
Prosecution Insights