Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/419,445

MECHANICAL STIFFENER FOR INTEGRATED CIRCUIT PACKAGE WITH VARYING HEAT DISSIPATION MODES

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jan 22, 2024
Priority
Jan 24, 2023 — provisional 63/440,883
Examiner
MCCALL SHEPARD, SONYA D
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Marvell Asia Pte. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allowance Rate
1097 granted / 1181 resolved
+24.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
1205
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
73.5%
+33.5% vs TC avg
§102
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
§112
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1181 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 and 13 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-9, 12-21 and 24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen et al. US 2015/0162307 in view of Kuan et al. US 2023/0124098. PNG media_image1.png 376 735 media_image1.png Greyscale Chen et al. US 2015/0162307 Regarding claim 1, Chen et al. in Fig. 5A and [0035]-[0038] disclose an integrated circuit device package comprising: a substrate 18; at least two integrated circuit dies 10, 12 mounted to the substrate 18; and a thermally conductive stiffener (i.e. contour lid 62/22) attached to the substrate 18, the stiffener: having a first portion (annotated above) in a thermally conductive relationship with a surface of a first integrated circuit die 12 among the at least two integrated circuit dies to provide a first heat dissipation mode for the first integrated circuit die, and having a second portion (annotated above), different from the first portion, the second portion configured to provide a second heat dissipation mode, different from the first heat dissipation mode, for a second integrated circuit die 10 among the at least two integrated circuit dies. Chen et al. do not expressly disclose the contour lid 62/66 is attached to the substrate 18 to counteract warping of the substrate and an electrically conductive adhesive 60 disposed between the thermally conductive stiffener and the substrate for attaching the stiffener to the substrate, the adhesive and the stiffener being configured to form a shielding enclosure to shield one or more of the at least two integrated circuit dies from electromagnetic interference. Kuan et al. teach in Fig. 5 and [0038] a semiconductor package with warpage control including an electrically conductive and/or non-conductive adhesive 550 used when a stiffener 530 is made of an electrically conductive material. In one aspect, an electrically conductive adhesive 550 can be disposed such that the adhesive 550 will be in contact with ground contact pads 590 on the package substrate 510 and the stiffener 530 to ground the stiffener and thereby enable the stiffener 530 to provide electromagnetic interference or radio-frequency interference shielding benefits when the stiffener 530 is made of an electrically conductive material. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teachings of Kuan et al. in the integrated circuit of Chen et al. for the purpose of warpage control and to protect the integrated circuit dies from electromagnetic interference. Regarding claim 2, Chen et al. in view of Kuan et al. teach the device package of claim 1. Chen et al. in Fig. 5A and [0035]-[0038] teach wherein the stiffener 62/66 [0020]-[0038] is configured to: overlay the first integrated circuit die 12 among the at least two integrated circuit dies; and define an opening 70 [0023] at least partially exposing a surface of the second integrated circuit die 10 among the at least two integrated circuit dies to provide the second heat dissipation mode for the second integrated circuit die 10 among the at least two integrated circuit dies. Regarding claim 3, Chen et al. in view of Kuan et al. teach the device package of claim 2. Chen et al. in Fig. 5A and [0035]-[0038] teach the device package of claim 2, further comprising a heat sink 72a, 72b [0023]-[0037] the heat sink being: disposed in a thermally conductive relationship with the second integrated circuit die 10 among the at least two integrated circuit dies through the opening in the stiffener 62/66 [0020]-[0038]; and configured to dissipate heat from the second integrated circuit die 10 among the at least two integrated circuit dies. Regarding claim 4, Chen et al. in view of Kuan et al. teach the device package of claim 3. Chen et al. in Fig. 5A and [0035]-[0038] teach wherein the heat sink 72a, 72b [0023]-[0037] is disposed in a thermally conductive relationship with the second integrated circuit die 10 among the at least two integrated circuit dies without being in thermally conductive contact with the first integrated circuit die 12 among the at least two integrated circuit dies. Regarding claim 5, Chen et al. in view of Kuan et al. teach the device package of claim 1. Chen et al. in Fig. 5A and [0035]-[0038] teach the device package of claim 1, further comprising a heat sink 72a, 72b [0023]-[0037] disposed in a thermally conductive relationship with the stiffener 62/66 [0020]-[0038], the heat sink 72a, 72b [0023]-[0037] being configured to dissipate heat from the first integrated circuit die 12 [0026] among the at least two integrated circuit dies. Regarding claim 6, Chen et al. in view of Kuan et al. teach the device package of claim 1. Chen et al. in Fig. 5A and [0035]-[0038] teach the device package of claim 1, further comprising a thermal interface material (TIM) 58b [0019] disposed between the first portion of the stiffener and the surface of the first integrated circuit die 12 among the at least two integrated circuit dies, the TIM thermally coupling the first portion of the stiffener 62/66 [0020]-[0038] to the first integrated circuit die 12 among the at least two integrated circuit dies. Regarding claim 7, Chen et al. in view of Kuan et al. teach the device package of claim 6. Chen et al. in Fig. 5A and [0035]-[0038] teach wherein the TIM 58b comprises a thermally-conductive polymer [0019]. Regarding claim 8, Chen et al. in view of Kuan et al. teach the device package of claim 6. Chen et al. in Fig. 5A and [0035]-[0038] teach wherein the TIM 58b is a metallic TIM comprising at least one of indium or gallium [0019]. Regarding claim 9, Chen et al. in view of Kuan et al. teach the device package of claim 1. Kuan et al. in [0031] teach wherein the stiffener 230 comprises at least one of stainless steel or nickel-coated copper. Regarding claim 12, Chen et al. in view of Kuan et al. teach the device package of claim 1. Kuan et al. in [0038] teach wherein the adhesive 550 is electrically grounded. Regarding claim 13, Chen et al. in [0010]-[0038] disclose method for packaging an integrated circuit comprising: a substrate 18; and at least two integrated circuit dies 10, 12 mounted to the substrate 18; the method comprising: attaching a thermally conductive stiffener (i.e. contour lid 62/22) to the substrate 18, arranging a first portion (annotated above) of the stiffener in a thermally conductive relationship with a surface of a first integrated circuit die 12 among the at least two integrated circuit dies to provide a first heat dissipation mode for the first integrated circuit die, and arranging a second portion (annotated above) of the stiffener, different from the first portion, the second portion configured to provide a second heat dissipation mode, different from the first heat dissipation mode, for a second integrated circuit die 10 among the at least two integrated circuit dies. Chen et al. do not expressly disclose attaching the stiffener to the substrate 18 with an electrically conductive adhesive disposed between the thermally conductive stiffener and the substrate, to counteract warping of the substrate and to form a shielding enclosure to shield one or more of the at least two integrated circuit dies from electromagnetic interference. Kuan et al. teach in Fig. 5 and [0038] a semiconductor package and method of making the semiconductor package with warpage control including an electrically conductive and/or non-conductive adhesive 550 used when a stiffener 530 is made of an electrically conductive material. In one aspect, an electrically conductive adhesive 550 can be disposed such that the adhesive 550 will be in contact with ground contact pads 590 on the package substrate 510 and the stiffener 530 to ground the stiffener and thereby enable the stiffener 530 to provide electromagnetic interference or radio-frequency interference shielding benefits when the stiffener 530 is made of an electrically conductive material. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teachings of Kuan et al. in the integrated circuit of Chen et al. for the purpose of warpage control and to protect the integrated circuit dies from electromagnetic interference. Regarding claim 14, Chen et al. in view of Kuan et al. teach the method according to claim 13 for packaging an integrated circuit. Chen et al. in Fig. 5A and [0010]-[0038] teach the method, further comprising: configuring the stiffener 62/66 [0020]-[0038] to overlay the first integrated circuit die 12 among the at least two integrated circuit dies; and at least partially exposing, through an opening 70 [0023] in the stiffener 62/66, a surface of the second integrated circuit die 10 among the at least two integrated circuit dies to provide the second heat dissipation mode for the second integrated circuit die 10 among the at least two integrated circuit dies. Regarding claim 15, Chen et al. in view of Kuan et al. teach the method according to claim 14 for packaging an integrated circuit. Chen et al. in Fig. 5A and [0010]-[0038] teach the method, further comprising: disposing a heat sink 72a, 72b [0023]-[0037] in a thermally conductive relationship with the second integrated circuit die 10 among the at least two integrated circuit dies through the opening 70 [0023] in the stiffener 62/66; and configuring the heat sink 72a,72b [0023]-[0037] to dissipate heat from the second integrated circuit die 10 among the at least two integrated circuit dies. Regarding claim 16, Chen et al. in view of Kuan et al. teach the method according to claim 15 for packaging an integrated circuit. Chen et al. in Fig. 5A and [0010]-[0038] teach the method, further comprising: disposing the heat sink 72a, 72b [0023]-[0037] in a thermally conductive relationship with the second integrated circuit die 10 among the at least two integrated circuit dies without being in thermally conductive contact with the first integrated circuit die 12 among the at least two integrated circuit dies. Regarding claim 17, Chen et al. in view of Kuan et al. teach the method according to claim 13 for packaging an integrated circuit. Chen et al. in Fig. 5A and [0010]-[0038] teach the method, further comprising: disposing a heat sink 72a, 72b [0023]-[0037] in a thermally conductive relationship with the stiffener 62/66 [0020]-[0038], the heat sink 72a, 72b being configured to dissipate heat from the first integrated circuit die 12 among the at least two integrated circuit dies [0023]-[0037]. Regarding claim 18, Chen et al. in view of Kuan et al. teach the method according to claim 13 for packaging an integrated circuit. Chen et al. in Fig. 5A and [0010]-[0038] teach the method, further comprising: disposing a thermal interface material (TIM) 58b [0019] between the first portion of the stiffener 62/66 [0020]-[0038] and the surface of the first integrated circuit die 12 among the at least two integrated circuit dies, the TIM 58b thermally coupling the first portion of the stiffener 62/66 to the first integrated circuit die 12 among the at least two integrated circuit dies. Regarding claim 19, Chen et al. in view of Kuan et al. teach the method according to claim 18 for packaging an integrated circuit. Chen et al. in Fig. 5A and [0010]-[0038] teach wherein disposing the TIM 58b comprises disposing a heat-dissipating polymer [0019]. Regarding claim 20, Chen et al. in view of Kuan et al. teach the method according to claim 18 for packaging an integrated circuit. Chen et al. in Fig. 5A and [0010]-[0038] teach wherein disposing the TIM 58b comprises disposing a metallic TIM comprising at least one of indium or gallium [0019]. Regarding claim 21, Chen et al. in view of Kuan et al. teach the method according to claim 13 for packaging an integrated circuit. Kuan et al. in [0031] teach wherein attaching the stiffener 230 comprises attaching a stiffener comprising at least one of stainless steel or nickel-coated copper. Regarding claim 24, Chen et al. in view of Kuan et al. teach the method according to claim 13 for packaging an integrated circuit. Kuan et al. in [0038] teach the method, further comprising: electrically grounding the adhesive 550. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SONYA D MCCALL-SHEPARD whose telephone number is (571)272-9801. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8:30 AM-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julio J. Maldonado can be reached at (571)272-1864. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Sonya McCall-Shepard/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2898
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 22, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 17, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 07, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12685177
RF SWITCH DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SAME
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672273
IMPLANT FOR TRANSISTOR BITLINE CONTACT AND JUNCTION FORMATION
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666950
METAL ROUTING THAT OVERLAPS NMOS AND PMOS REGIONS OF A TRANSISTOR
4y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666694
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 12m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666949
CIRCUIT CELLS HAVING POWER STUBS
2y 12m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+3.8%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1181 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month