Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 16, 2026
Application No. 18/419,886

POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 23, 2024
Priority
Jan 30, 2023 — JP 2023-011868
Examiner
TORRES RUIZ, JOHALI ALEJANDRA
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allowance Rate
325 granted / 597 resolved
-13.6% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
633
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
65.0%
+25.0% vs TC avg
§102
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
§112
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 597 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 1/23/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Juang et al. (US 2021/0126468) in view of Goto et al. (US 2019/0267896) and Mori et al. (US 2018/0006547). Claims 1-2: Juang teaches a power supply system (Fig.5) comprising: an alternating current sweep unit (110) for outputting alternating current power from a first battery string (110a), a second battery string (110b), and a third battery string (110c) that have been Y-connected (Fig.4) (Par.55); a control device (140) for controlling the alternating current sweep unit (110) (Par.60), wherein: each of the first battery string (110a), the second battery string (110b), and the third battery string (110c) includes a plurality of battery circuit modules (112a-112c) connected in series (Fig.4) (Par.48); and each of the battery circuit modules (112a-112c) includes a battery and a first output terminal and a second output terminal to which a voltage of the battery is applied (Fig.4) (Par.47, 62 and 64); and Juang does not explicitly teach each of the battery circuit modules includes a battery, a first switch connected in parallel to the battery, a second switch connected in series to the battery, and a first output terminal and a second output terminal to which a voltage of the battery is applied when the first switch is in an OFF state and the second switch is in an ON state. Goto teaches a plurality of battery circuit modules (10a-10c) (Fig.1); each of the battery circuit modules (10a-10c) includes a battery (B), a first switch (S1) connected in parallel to the battery (B), a second switch (S2) connected in series to the battery (B) (Par.22), and a first output terminal (OT on one end of S1) and a second output terminal (other end of S1) to which a voltage of the battery (B) is applied when the first switch (S1) is in an OFF state and the second switch (S2) is in an ON state (Fig.4B) (Par.31). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have had the teachings of Goto in the device of Juang to have had switching element that allows for actively selecting bypassing or electrically connecting a battery circuit module (Par.30-31) providing a simple structure capable of easily designing a desired output voltage (Par.6). Furthermore, Juang does not explicitly teach the control device is configured to set an offset voltage of an alternating current voltage output from each of the first battery string, the second battery string, and the third battery string based on a command voltage of the first battery string, the second battery string, and the third battery string; the control device sets the offset voltage based on an amplitude of the command voltage. Mori teaches a control device (5) (Fig.1) (Par.51) configured to set an offset voltage (Voffset1) of an alternating current voltage output from each of a first phase, a second phase and a third phase based on an amplitude of a command voltage (Vu1, Vv1, Vw1) of the first phase, the second phase and the third phase (Par.53 and 225). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have had the teachings of Mori in the device of Juang to have had reduced noise (Par.11) and have had avoided voltage saturation (Par.249). Claim 3: Juang in view of Goto and Mori teach the limitations of claim 2 as disclosed above. Juang teaches wherein the control device (140) controls the alternating current sweep unit (110) such that an alternating current voltage having a phase difference by 120° from each of the first battery string (110a), the second battery string (110b), and the third battery string (110c) is output (Fig.4) (Par.55). Juang does not explicitly teach the control device sets the offset voltage based on an offset component of the command voltage of the first battery string, the second battery string and the third battery string. Mori teaches the control device (5) sets the offset voltage (Voffset1) based on an offset component of the command voltage of the first phase, the second phase and the third phase (Par.225). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have had the teachings of Mori in the device of Juang to have had avoided voltage saturation (Par.249). Claim 4: Juang in view of Goto and Mori teach the limitations of claim 1 as disclosed above. Juang does not explicitly teach wherein the control device sets the offset voltage based on a minimum voltage output from each of the first battery string, the second battery string, and the third battery string. Mori teaches the control device (5) sets the offset voltage (Voffset1) based on a minimum voltage (Vmin1) of the first phase, the second phase and the third phase (Par.165 and 169-171). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have had the teachings of Mori in the device of Juang to have had improved heat generation balance between switching elements in the system (Par.175-176). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHALI ALEJANDRA TORRES RUIZ whose telephone number is (571)270-1262. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10:00am-6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julian D Huffman can be reached at 571-272-2147. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHALI A TORRES RUIZ/Examiner, Art Unit 2859 /JULIAN D HUFFMAN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2859
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 23, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12756184
RESTART PROTECTION DEVICE
5y 5m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12752653
METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A CHARGING DEVICE
4y 9m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12726131
Adaptive Power Control for Two-Stage AC/DC or DC/DC Isolated Power Converters
4y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12703253
Coil Unit for Inductively Charging a Vehicle, and System
7y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12686285
MOBILE MODULAR BATTERY CHARGING AND EXCHANGE SYSTEM
4y 10m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+23.5%)
3y 6m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 597 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month