Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/420,083

STORAGE DEVICE AND CONNECTION CHECKING METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 23, 2024
Priority
Feb 13, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0018969 +1 more
Examiner
KNAPP, JUSTIN R
Art Unit
2112
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
576 granted / 682 resolved
+29.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
704
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.7%
-31.3% vs TC avg
§103
32.6%
-7.4% vs TC avg
§102
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
§112
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 682 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of claims 1-20 in the reply filed on February 17, 2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that Applicants submit that the search and examination of all the claims may be made without serious burden. This is found persuasive and the restriction is withdrawn. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 19 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Referring to claim 19, the claim as written, recites, a system-on-chip “configured to transmit a training pattern to the DRAM device” and then “the processing circuitry further configured to determine whether a state of connection to the DRAM device is poor, based on a training pattern received from the DRAM device and the training pattern stored in the system-on-chip, during a connection state checking operation”. It’s not clear if each instance of the claimed “a training pattern” recited in line 3 should be interpreted as the same “a training pattern” in line 7 or different. Allowable Subject Matter The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claims 1-18, the prior art of record has not taught, either individually or in combination, and together with all other claimed features: a storage device comprising a first chip and a second chip are configured to align a plurality of data signals using a training command during a training operation, and the first chip and the second chip are configured to check whether a connection state between first data input/output pins of the first chip and second data input/output pins of the second chip is poor, by utilizing the training command, during a connection state checking operation; or setting a frequency of a clock signal transmitted from the first chip to the second chip, to be lower than a frequency in a training operation; determining a connection relationship between the first chip and the second chip based on a training pattern stored in the first chip and the training pattern transmitted from the second chip, wherein the training command and the training pattern stored in the first chip are a command and a pattern used for the training operation, respectively. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Justin Knapp whose telephone number is (571)270-3008. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 am - 4:30 pm (ET). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Albert Decady can be reached at (571) 272-3819. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Justin R. Knapp Primary Examiner Art Unit 2112 /JUSTIN R KNAPP/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2112
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683703
DATA SCRAMBLING FOR REPEAT OPERATIONS
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675363
TECHNIQUES FOR IMPROVED DATA TRANSFER
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668288
OBSTACLE DETECTION SYSTEM USING MULTIPLE PROCESSORS
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665615
SUBBLOCK ALLOCATION SEQUENCE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665616
COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND COMMUNICATION METHOD FOR REALIZING HIGH FREQUENCY UTILISATION EFFICIENCY
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+8.3%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 682 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month